Didn't say it was.Probabilistic is not determined. — Rich
So you've repeatedly asserted. You are free to deny any evidence that does not convenience your faith.There is zero support for determinism.
I think hidden variable interpretation is bunk, but it would be an example of deterministic physics if it were the case.You and the OP late looking for some hidden variables that are deterministic.
You seem to be unclear on the difference between evidence and proof. Yes, there is no disproof of idealism, but evidence abounds. It is also illogical to debate idealism since you're having a debate with a consciousness that cannot be experienced, and hence doesn't exist.The universe hasn't changed in terms of physical laws since animal life emerged.
— fdrake
We have no evidence of this one way or another.
Nothing requires consciousness
— fdrake
No evidence one way or another. — Rich
1) There is no written record that X influences Y before time t.
2) Therefore there is no evidence that X influences Y. — fdrake
but you can't know there was 100 million years ago since there are no written records from that date, thus your entire post is meaningless. — fdrake
Now all you have to show is that this would have been the same observation 50 million years ago. — Rich
That the equations that are used now to measure some results are the same results that were observed 5 billion years ago. — Rich
That the equations that are used now to measure some results are the same results that were observed 5 billion years ago. — Rich
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.