• BC
    13.5k
    I do not know which bad outcome Americans (or other people) are most likely to end up with, but I think we should distinguish carefully among the possibilities. What will head off one bad outcome might not be suitable for a different one.

    I think Americans have been fully inoculated against communism, but I think we are vulnerable to fascist, authoritarian, and/or dictatorship viruses. We can't rule out fascism or authoritarianism from developing within the form of representative democracy.

    How compatible do you think fascism or authoritarianism is with American society? What cultural resources tend to support fascism/authoritarianism? Which cultural characteristics tend to thwart development toward fascism and authoritarianism?
  • gurugeorge
    514
    The US already had its Fascist period at the appropriate time, with the early 20th century Progressives. The New Deal was essentially a mildly Fascist program, very similar to Mussolini's and Hitler's ideas (both Wilson and FDR were admirers of Mussolini). And both Social Democracy and Fascism were, in a way, developments of Bismarck's original late 19th century ideas about what we now call the welfare state.

    It's a bit of a mistake to associate "authoritarianism" exclusively with the Right (the error comes from Adorno's absurd drivel in The Authoritarian Personality). Communism was plenty authoritarian.

    I don't think the US is in danger of being a Fascist state any time soon. It might be possible again in the future, but it's not on the horizon at all at the moment, TDS sufferers notwithstanding.
  • Shawn
    13.2k
    The US already had its Fascist period at the appropriate time, with the early 20th century Progressives. The New Deal was essentially a mildly Fascist program, very similar to Mussolini's and Hitler's ideas (both Wilson and FDR were admirers of Mussolini). And both Social Democracy and Fascism were, in a way, developments of Bismarck's original late 19th century ideas about what we now call the welfare state.gurugeorge

    I'm reading Jonah Goldberg's, Liberal Fascism, and he does make that point in the book. Where did you service your conclusion, from that book too?
  • 0 thru 9
    1.5k
    Any possible appearance of a fascist future for the USA would be a plutocracy/capitalist corporatocracy. It probably already is. Orwell’s 1984 is now quaint and like child’s play. The government now is a de facto employee and/or prostitute of our beloved billionaire heroes and prosperity gospel role models. The current POTUS not surprisingly happens to be both. The rugged individualism of US history has become a ragged and rigged individualism. Ragged because we are increasingly isolated and vulnerable. Rigged because certain forces find that the desperation of the population is to their advantage. Talk about poisoning the well. Slavery ended when? Or did it simply change form?

    Partisan political finger pointing is good for a smug laugh, but not much more at this point. The violent protesters of both extremes are valiant heroes only in their own minds, and are almost indistinguishable from each other.

    We have become the Pharoah, shrugging off each increasing plague. Just the cost of doing business. Not much to wait for... except maybe for the Galactic Mothership to return... or the Rapture... or the Earth’s magnetic poles flipping... or for Frodo to throw the damned ring back into the fire already.
  • rachMiel
    52
    No worries, it's just the Fourth Turning. Sit back and relax for another decade or so, weather the storm ... and all shall be reborn in another First Turning! The long view is the only view that will keep us sane.

    4gm88nz1jz1z.jpg
  • Number2018
    559
    " What cultural resources tend to support fascism?"I think it is the political culture of "fake news" and "whitch hunt".
    In the last few years, mass media and most of political establishment care just about getting
    public's immediate attention, exploiting the most primitive collective emotions.
  • gurugeorge
    514
    I'm reading Jonah Goldberg's, Liberal Fascism, and he does make that point in the book. Where did you service your conclusion, from that book too?Posty McPostface

    No, from general reading and reading of history (I'm 58, educated in a different age); but the following article is probably the best thing you can easily find on the web on Fascism:- http://www.la-articles.org.uk/fascism.htm (Steele is an ex-Communist libertarian btw.)

    Goldberg's book is ok, but his take is a bit too neocon for my tastes, and he downplays the Right-wing element in Fascism a bit too much. The usual Left-wing narrative about Fascism is certainly hokum, but there's a grain of truth to associating it somewhat with the Right as well as the Left (that's partly why it was thought of as a "Third Way" at the time - it blended elements of revolutionary socialism with some older traditionalist Right-wing tropes, like strong leadership, hierarchy, military mobilization, etc. - but then again, it was also forward-looking, futurist, etc. too).
  • tim wood
    9.2k
    How compatible do you think fascism or authoritarianism is with American society? What cultural resources tend to support fascism/authoritarianism? Which cultural characteristics tend to thwart development toward fascism and authoritarianism?Bitter Crank

    We're not defining fascism or authoritarianism (FA), which for the moment is ok with me. I think it is in the bedrock of original American being and aspiration. While it is an error to suppose that the original thirteen colonies were like as littermates, it is a general truth that those who came here wanted both to escape persecution and (less explicitly) to be free to persecute others according to their own tastes. We weren't a melting pot - if we ever were - until much later.

    And probably the FA impulse isn't merely American. Likely it is deeply human. An evil, then, needing to be fought, and when necessary, without quarter.

    The tendency against FA, imo, lies in two parts. First, don't infringe on my right to be a FAist - the original "freedom." The second is that which we prefer to reference, our so-called belief in the freedom to be free of persecution qua. How to preserve this freedom within an ascendant FA cycle, such as the US has been undergoing since Nixon/Reagan Republicanism came to be, is a challenge, not least because FA is essentially unprincipled. If it can be combated through law and the ballot, so much the better for all of us, FAists included. The alternative is Jefferson's blood of tyrants and patriots that "refreshes the tree of liberty." But revolution - or murder, depending on who owns the narrative - is a false alternative. It is no alternative at all. It is instead an irreversible step that breaks the bonds and boundaries of law and destroys the thing it meant to preserve

    In fact, however, the FA jackboots are active and among us, called variously TSA, ICE, and so forth. Brutalists under cover of statute. What they do not individually realize is that every enforcement of their "law" breaks the real law. They work, in short, for their own doom, realized in one or another form.

    It would a good day, I think, if the monsters among us could be got to understand that our way, freedom, law, the ballot, and an active democracy, is the best way, even for them!
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.