OK, I'll see what I can do. Consider the existence of an object. It has a temporal extension past and future. From this perspective the present is irrelevant, the object has a period of time when it exists, and so be it. But if you consider changes to the object, they only occur at the present, as time is passing. We might say that changes occurred in the past, and will occur in the future, but they only actually occur at the present.as time is passing. So the present presents us with a certain discontinuity of existence of the object if we allow that change occurs at the present.
That's one way of looking at the present, as the discontinuity of existence. Another way is to look at it as the time in which we (subjects) exist. This separates us from objects which extend into past and future, allowing the concept of immortality as something which doesn't partake in past or future, but is always at the present. This makes the present a continuity of existence.
So we have two distinct ways of thinking of the present, one is as the time when change to physical objects occurs, and the other is as something distinct from past and future. Since we associate the self, with being at the present, these two ways give two distinct approaches to self-identification. One is as a source of change in the physical world, and the other is as something distinct from the physical world. The problem is that there seems to be reality to both perspectives, so it would appear necessary to establish compatibility between them. To establish compatibility requires recognizing, in a sense, that they are both wrong. So we need to dismiss them both in order to come up with a real representation of the self. — Metaphysician Undercover
It's easier to see this process if we use exaggerated examples. You're walking down the hall and someone sets off a firecracker behind you. This could be a mortal threat, so your mind pushes the thinker and thinking aside, no time for that right now.
5d — Jake
I have experimented extensively with hallucinogens including LSD, Mescaline, Psilocybin, DMT and Sylvia divinorum, and I have had the most bizarre experiences, but never one about which nothing all could be said. — Janus
Psychedelic experiences... It all depends on so many factors. The rule of thumb is to be in a healthy state of mind before going into one. — Blue Lux
This is a good environment, positive outlook, etc... — Blue Lux
The psychedelic takes you on an adventure. — Blue Lux
Fighting it is what causes 'bad trips.' — Blue Lux
Personally the most revealing psychedelics are LSD, DMT and mushrooms (excluding amanita muscaria). — Blue Lux
And I have experienced bad trips, absolutely hellish trips, in fact; although for me in my first phase (!7-20 years old) of experimentation each trip usually started out like that and then came good (very good!) later. — Janus
At the outset of this exploration into your depression, and depression in general you equivocated upon a question that strikes at the heart of human self identity. — Marcus de Brun
What if I said, that consistency in formulating one's identity (having a narrative) is of supreme importance to an individual. What do you then say to someone that is depressed? Snap out of it? — Posty McPostface
Identity must precede the narrative; if the narrative is to have any meaning outside the 'endless loop' scenario. — Marcus de Brun
Snap into it. — Marcus de Brun
How?? — Posty McPostface
By dealing with the initial central equivocation first, and by then constructing an honest self narrative on that basis. — Marcus de Brun
Sorry but its not going to come from me.
I am neither your jailer nor your judge. :)
You have posted it in a conversation with me on this topic. You can find it there if you have no luck with introspection.
M — Marcus de Brun
I hope that is an indication that the offending digit is soon to be removed from the place of little sunshine. — Marcus de Brun
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.