This is because, the only way for him/her to trigger the idea of the mailbox, is by encountering one. — SicklerTroy
To elaborate, while yes, the existence of the mailbox can be questioned, the person’s encounter with it, on the other hand, can not. This is because, the only way for him/her to trigger the idea of the mailbox, is by encountering one. — SicklerTroy
objectively someone’s future self, and past self is their relative present, meaning that they can indeed exist in the future or past as long as relatively, they are in the present. — SicklerTroy
Ones higher conscience allows one to connect his/her experience to his/her belief of what that idea is. — SicklerTroy
This argument however, does not hold up as under the provided paradigm of Perpetual Representative Realism, it is impossible to associate the wrong belief with the wrong truth. — SicklerTroy
It is therefore, impossible for him/her to associate an incorrect truth to a belief, or vice versa. — SicklerTroy
This is because, the only way for him/her to trigger the idea of the mailbox, is by encountering one. — SicklerTroy
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.