Logic is the realisation of the laws which govern phenomena...Quote source. — eodnhoj7
Also those phenomena, as logical, require logic to circle back on itself — eodnhoj7
You still have not given me what I ask for, I am getting the impression you are just make all of this up and pretending to be an authority. — eodnhoj7
How can something be equal to itself unless it is seperate from itself? — eodnhoj7
Try the above for example.And what evidence is that? — eodnhoj7
A line is a relation between points, and all axioms are relations of other axioms. A length is a relationship between points as well, under these terms Pi as a relation is Pi as a length. — eodnhoj7
P = P... it means that P is equal to itself...facepalm... — eodnhoj7
Actually it does considering a length observes a connection between specific localized points, I may walk 30 feet from Point A to Point B, where that 30 feet is the connection in space and time with Point A and Point B. — eodnhoj7
If, and when, "P=P" is used to signify the law of identity, it signifies that P is the same as itself, because that's what the law of identity states. It does not signify that p is equal to P. — Metaphysician Undercover
Sorry to be the one to inform you of this (though I know others such as brianw have already told you this): you appear to be incredibly, terribly, inept at interpretation. But I know your game, it's intentional, as deception. — Metaphysician Undercover
Point of Origin as unification of all axioms and all axioms as inversive, as an axiom. — eodnhoj7
Linear Definition as connection and seperation of axioms, as an axiom. — eodnhoj7
Circularity as maintenance and dissolution of axioms, as an axiom. — eodnhoj7
Each law defines the other through collaboration according to Brian. — eodnhoj7
I am simply following the fallacies of logic, unlike you...who is more logical? — eodnhoj7
Address above. However the Law of Identity is fault being P=P would require "=" to be defined under the same law in which it is not. It is void of meaning, hence the law contradicts itself. — eodnhoj7
Arguing contradiction is a logical conclusion is the fallacy which is being highlighted. That you can't realise that shows I should not waste any more time on you.
YOU WIN. — BrianW
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.