Merely agreeing on the problem can be problematic. Witness the debate over anthropogenic global warming, which probably pretty cleanly, though not perfectly, splits across left/right lines: many on the right don't even think AGW is happening, and so talk of solutions to this nonexistent problem is therefore moot.We can agree on a problem, yet we have a difficult time to agree on the solution. — ssu
The Fulda Gap of today would be the Suwalki Gap or corridor, btw.My view is that the only cohesive idea in all of this, is that it all serves Russian interests. And we have to admire our enemy for how he has and is - and is likely to continue to - manipulate us. But my gosh it's dangerous. Putin gets it into his head he can try to reclaim the Baltic states, or even try the Fulda Gap with a tank or two, and you can cash in your annuities. — tim wood
What makes you think they dont want to expand their empire? — DingoJones
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.