What the fuck?
Degrees upon degrees of batshittery.
Please elaborate. I've found nothing on this.Yes, your ‘whistleblower’ doesn’t even have direct knowledge of Trump’s conversation, according to CNN. — NOS4A2
Let's compare facts. Here's the facts I'm aware of:You guys have propped up DNC propaganda, conspiracy theories and investigations for years now it’s not surprising that you’re now calling foul when you beloved candidates and parties are receiving scrutiny of their own.
It doesn't matter - most Muslims either can not read at all and/or have not read any book but the Qur'an. It also doesn't matter because a Muslim will "believe" that all books are inferior to the Qur'an - the Qur'an being "believed" to be from a god, but is, in fact, just as man-made as any other book. — A Gnostic Agnostic
They accused Donald Trump of the same: his score came back perfect.
What "mental illness" did you have in mind, specifically? — A Gnostic Agnostic
This is precisely my point: people would rather justify their hatred for Trump than anything else. — A Gnostic Agnostic
Whataboutism? That’s convenient when your party and beloved candidates might be guilty of exactly that which you’ve been accusing others of being guilty of. — NOS4A2
I tend to do that, sorry. — A Gnostic Agnostic
Stop with the blind hatred... — A Gnostic Agnostic
The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.
It seems to me I see beliefs here. I see us them thinking here. I see blame here.The best example of this is the scapegoating/pinning of "collusion with Russia" onto Donald Trump, when in the reality it was the Clinton DNC who colluded to interfere in the 2016 (and now 2020) election. Again, the Clinton DNC is a front for the House of Islam: one required access to the "underground market" via Clinton, which is where you will find all of your human trafficking, pedophilia etc. and it leads back to the House of Islam. This is the sum of all fears of Islam: the world wakes up and realizes the depths of the corruption of the House of Islam. Hence, the need to destroy Trump at all costs given his knowledge that Islam is the root of fascism, and not "it's the Jews!". The Jews are the perpetual scapegoat for the House of Islam, which is why they still keep *some* Jews alive. You can't blame a group of people that don't exist. — A Gnostic Agnostic
This is what Giuliani and Trump want investigated. You don’t want it investigated? — NOS4A2
We know they want it investigated. The issue is over why they want it investigated and what they’re doing to push it to happen. If Trump is using taxpayer money to seek leverage against a political opponent then the outrage is warranted. If the United States has a legitimate stake in the situation and withholding military aid is appropriate in light of this then the outrage isn’t warranted.
Let’s be sure we hold firm to our standards. — NOS4A2
But remember, at least half a dozen committees of the U.S. Congress are investigating the President, which should give an idea of what taxpayer money is being spent on: seeking leverage against a political opponent. — NOS4A2
This is to say nothing of the spying on the Trump campaign by the previous administration and the party in power. — NOS4A2
Let’s be sure we hold firm to our standards. — NOS4A2
Your supposed standard here is really just false equivalence. It's the parliament's job to investigate the president. It's not Trump's job to investigate the Bidens.
Any spying on Trump has since been disclosed, and it wasn't done at the behest of the party.
My current standard is simply that the Inspector General (a Trump appointee no less) considers it credible and of urgent concern (whether criminal or as a matter of national security), and so there is a good reason to believe that Trump's motives and/or actions aren't appropriate – and so certainly in need of Congressional oversight, which makes the DNI's decision to not turn over the complaint to Congress (at the White House's behest) despite their legal requirement to do so suspect and troubling.
There really just doesn't seem to be a legitimate defense against this scandal.
Parliament? Yes, you’re right, Congress should investigate the executive branch. But as far as I know Trump is not investigating anyone. In fact, he was accused of encouraging the Ukrainians to do so. — NOS4A2
The interactions between the FBI, the DNC, FusionGPS and Christopher Steele’s DNC-funded oppo research implies to me otherwise. — NOS4A2
We already know from testimony that the FBI counsel, James Baker, was given Russia investigation-related information by one of the lawyers of Perkins-Cole, who funded the dodgy Steele dossier, all of which was funded by the DNC. Either way, the investigation into the beginnings of that investigations, and the incestuous interactions between FBI and DNC, will be illuminating. — NOS4A2
So your standard for an "incestous relationship" (nice job inserting another baseless claim) is that a lawyer from a firm affiliated with the DNC gave information to an FBI counsel. That's about as incestous as sitting in a room with your cousin.
This is what Giuliani and Trump want investigated. You don’t want it investigated? — NOS4A2
DNC-funded, anti-Trump opposition research led to the spying of their political opposition, and led a vast subsection of credulous voters to believe in the Russian collusion hoax. — NOS4A2
At no point was the fact that the research was DNC funded, was gathered by a biased anti-trump spy, added to any FISA applications or their subsequent renewals. — NOS4A2
There was no Russian collusion hoax. There was an investigation. It found that the efforts of Trump's campaign fell short of criminal collision. You're lying through your teeth again.
A theme is not a hoax. Stop sneaking in falsehoods via rhetoric or offhand remarks.
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.