Eh? No, the judgement is about something featuring as the object of one of Helen's attitudes - a valuing attitude. — Bartricks
Yes, definitions are sufficient to value, for to be defined is to be conceived, which is always the primary ground for some immediate and subsequent mediate cognizant ability... — Mww
Well, that's just false. — Bartricks
In what way will you justify your claim about Helen's attitude? — alcontali
Not until you justify something - say something that addresses my argument. — Bartricks
I think moral values are demonstrably subjective. — Bartricks
Only a subject can value something — Bartricks
I have answered lots of your questions, and I still think they are not in good faith.
Anyway, be so good as to answer some of mine.
Do you think this argument is valid?
1. If Bartricks Potter is Superman, then if Superman went to the grocery, necessarily Bartricks Potter went to the grocery
2. If Superman went to the grocery, Bartricks Potter did not necessarily go to the grocery.
3. Therefore, Bartricks Potter is not Superman.
If you do, then just swap 'Bartricks Potter' for 'moral values' and 'Superman' for 'my values' and you've got my argument — Bartricks
If I go to pawn shot to sell gold medals to buy fake passport, General Mszvelescvi did not necessarily go to pawn shop to sell gold medals to buy fake passport. — Bartricks
1. if bag of turnips is wife, then if wife go market, necessarily bag of turnips go market
2. If wife go market, bag of turnips not necessarily go market
3. Therefore, bag of turnips not wife. — Bartricks
They are the same. Change "bag of turnips" for "moral values". Then change "wife" to "my values". — Bartricks
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.