Evolution indeed can be seen as a function of this movement, but eventually entropy will take over, and everything will end up in a quiet, luke-warm, uneventful and smooth movementless world. — god must be atheist
the "real answer" to that is that WE DON"T KNOW. — Zuhair
The sad truth is that we do. Entropy will nullify all movements in the entire world. — god must be atheist
I don't know if you can call it a fact. It makes sense, much like evolution does. — god must be atheist
There are lots of paradoxes in monotheism, that I don't see in dichotomous optimistic realism. — Zuhair
Why would you add when you can delete and get the same result? — TheMadFool
Monotheism pictures a sole wise good God who created a world in which evil is so prevalent, that he can of course stop at any time, yet permit it to exist physically, for some agnostic purpose. — Zuhair
One of the views that combines the laws of thermodynamics, especially entropy, and a god is deism. In which one believes there is a god that created the universe and actualized the world we live in, but after his creation, decided to sit back and allow the world to run its course. Which allows evil, entropy, and natural disasters to take place. Could this god be the benevolent, omnipotent, omniscient God of Christianity?Isn't it MORE ethical to think that the source of good is not the same as the source of evil, that there are natural processes that can even be rational (but natural) that planned all Good things, and that opposes a vigorous natural but separate chaotic stuff that is the source of evil, that the first good natural processes are taming over time, thus resulting in "evolution" .
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.