Yes 'usefulness' is a property of truth. — ovdtogt
How is any of the above without regard for time when time is one of the fundamental references for all those relations you've pointed out? — BrianW
I've taken some time to think. So what I've found, and am here to state with certainty, that existence is therefore only provable insofar as human comprehension can be achieved. This means that existence so far is only provable with the human that can comprehend the universe the most, or the collective reasoning of it. — ep3265
And falsehood... so usefulness is of no help here when setting out truth(as distinct from falsehood). — creativesoul
Usefulness can be the property of a falsehood not known to be false. — ovdtogt
Yes 'usefulness' is a property of truth.If the 'truth' does not contain 'usefulness'(i.e information) it can not be considered 'truth'.
Usefulness is a property of information.
Unless a statement contains information, it is totally meaningless and does not contain truth.
Truth without information has no value and therefor can not be truth.
Truth without information is not truth. — ovdtogt
And falsehood known to be false... so usefulness — creativesoul
This is self-contradictory and/or incoherent.
Let A = usefulness
Let B = truth
Let C = information
Let D = a statement — creativesoul
This is self-contradictory and/or incoherent.
Let A = usefulness
Let B = truth
Let C = information
Let D = a statement
— creativesoul
And this is a totally useless statement. — ovdtogt
what do you find so useful in falsehoods? — ovdtogt
Usefulness can be the property of a falsehood known to be false. — creativesoul
What do you find useful in a falsehood known to be false? — ovdtogt
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.