What is mind? Is a good question; do you think your mind is solitary? — Qwex
Otherwise, such a state of disconnected being is like having no language or models to describe (imagine) what “I” am about, so I’d be more like a reptile (just acting) than like a human (self-reflecting/introspection). — Sir Philo Sophia
I'll throw out a third options. Other minds are both other minds and also part of the same mind. A bit like a subpersonality in one of us. — Coben
I am sure he assumed other minds existed most of the time, — Coben
Some solipsists are saying there are not other minds, period. — Coben
These solipsists would then, I think, not be physicalists or even dualists, but idealists or something similar. — Coben
It's impossible to know whether the world is an illusion or not because our mind and our senses, the only access points we have to knowing the truth, are unreliable. So is everyone except you a p-zombie? Since you can't trust your mind or your senses, it follows that you can't know that either. So hard solipsism is untenable - certainty on the matter is impossible. — TheMadFool
Hard or strong solipsism, if it claims the non-existence of other minds, must furnish further proof of how it came to be certain that other minds don't exist. What is this proof? — TheMadFool
It was an imperative for Descartes to restore faith in his mind and senses and I think god's existence, being that god is truthful, allowed Descartes to do that - he came to the conclusion that he wasn't being deceived. — TheMadFool
I applaud you for implicitly rejecting such justificationism, as your comment suggests that you think in terms of critical rationalism, the view that one ought to accept whatever beliefs one wants unless it can be shown that one must reject them. Which is the right way to think about things, because justificationism inevitably ends in nihilism, and nihilism is just giving up. — Pfhorrest
The kind of people employing radical doubt like Descartes does tend to be justificationists — Pfhorrest
It's impossible to know whether the world is an illusion or not because our mind and our senses, the only access points we have to knowing the truth, are unreliable. So is everyone except you a p-zombie? Since you can't trust your mind or your senses, it follows that you can't know that either. So hard solipsism is untenable - certainty on the matter is impossible. — TheMadFool
So hard solipsism is untenable - certainty on the matter is — TheMadFool
I was applauding you for pointing out that "hard solipsism ...must furnish further proof of how it came to be certain that other minds don't exist". — Pfhorrest
Maybe we need to see what you mean by "hard solipsism". Can you differentiate it for me from "solipsism"? — god must be atheist
As is obvious the former would need proof but the latter just follows from Descartes' skepticism. — TheMadFool
That is, I would say that the whole premise that you have any sense of certainty of knowledge or existence within one’s own mind cannot happen without knowledge of one’s embodiment within some external context — Sir Philo Sophia
I believe that the only way to overcome solipsism or extreme subjectivism is by starting from Husserl's intentionality — David Mo
I seriously doubt that qualia of conscious experience of you as “I” can happen without resonating with other external embodiments/minds. — Sir Philo Sophia
without THE APPEARANCE OF resonating with other external embodiments/minds — Arne
Cogito ergo sum does establish that "Thought" exists now: There is thought now, is how I like to generalize that aphorism. However the "I" seems like an add-on. — Pantagruel
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.