At work yesterday I set up three jars and looked in the box and it was empty. On the shelf was all six. The universe has done something nice — Gregory

to keep this a legit thread — Gregory

Dunning and Kruger are easily refuted. — Gregory

there are only three options when providing further proof in response to further questioning: — Münchhausen trilemma (wiki)

• The circular argument, in which the proof of some proposition is supported only by that proposition
• The regressive argument, in which each proof requires a further proof, ad infinitum
• The axiomatic argument, which rests on accepted precepts which are merely asserted rather than defended

But I see now that talk of the the Dunning-Kruger effect is a failed attempt by THEM to libel those who have seen through their machinations. — Banno

Napoleon Hill had perfectly legit reasons to believe that if people tell themselves they are good at something they become good at it through the use of their subconscious. — Gregory

So I reject their conclusion as unscientific. — Gregory

What scientific methods did Napoleon Hill employ? — InPitzotl

Same as every psychological study that has ever been done: observation — Gregory

What scientific methods did Napoleon Hill employ? — InPitzotl