I'd be interested in reading how you reconcile omnipotence and omnibenevolence. I can attach meaning to omnipotence, but what (per you) does omnibenevolence mean? The (my) problem is a being who can do anything, but cannot do harm. Very likely you know I'm not the author of this problem, but rather that it is ancient.she is an omnipotent, .., omnibenevolent being - that is, God. — Bartricks
Saying the universe doesnt have the reason for its existence in itself is sheer poetry — Gregory
the necessary existent is necessary if an only if there is at least one chain of contingent existents — Daniel
if the existence of contingent existents causes the chain of existents to exist, why would it need an additional cause to exist (the external cause)? — Daniel
(Wayfarer) It's very impressive you know what kalaam is but actually no... — BARAA
Existence refers to what is finite and fallen and cut of from its true being. Within the finite realm issues of conflict between, for example, autonomy (Greek: 'autos' - self, 'nomos' - law) and heteronomy (Greek: 'heteros' - other, 'nomos' - law) abound (there are also conflicts between the formal/emotional and static/dynamic). Resolution of these conflicts lies in the essential realm (the Ground of Meaning/the Ground of Being) which humans are cut off from yet also dependent upon ('In existence man is that finite being who is aware both of his belonging to and separation from the infinite'. Therefore 'existence' is 'estrangement'."
'....What Tillich is seeking to lead us to is an understanding of the 'God above God'. ...The Ground of Being (God) must be separate from the finite realm (which is a mixture of being and non-being) and that God cannot be 'a being' [i.e. a particular]. God must be beyond the finite realm. Anything brought from essence into existence is always going to be corrupted by ambiguity and our own finitude. Thus statements about God must always be symbolic (except the statement 'God is the Ground of Being'). Although we may claim to know God (the Infinite) we cannot. The moment God is brought from essence into existence God is corrupted by finitude and our limited understanding. In this realm we can never fully grasp (or speak about) who God really is. The infinite cannot remain infinite in the finite realm. That this rings true can be seen when we realize there are a multitude of different understandings of God within the Christian faith alone. They cannot all be completely true so there must exist a 'pure' understanding of God (essence) that each of these are speaking about (or glimpsing aspects of)...."
You ask 'how is he great?' He fully approves of himself, that's how. — Bartricks
Actually no...the necessary existent is a necessary existent even if it exists alone and I can't see why you're thinking otherwise. — BARAA
I hope you can see that you have to prove first that God has to be omnipotent (your version of omnipotence)..and since you believe that omnipotence requires being able to break laws of logic (according to your previous claims not mine) — BARAA
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.