But interestingly most contemporary philosophers of religion understand omnipotence differently. They interpret omnipotence to involve being able to do all that it is logically possible for one to do (actually, they normally qualify it a bit further to avoid certain problems). — Bartricks
I am not sure what you're saying. — Bartricks
What I am doing is exploring what it means to be all powerful. — Bartricks
I don't see that at all. Being all powerful means being able to do anything. How does talking about what such a being has actually done or is doing or whatever, 'introduce a deficiency'? — Bartricks
what 'being morally perfect' involves is determined by God. — Bartricks
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.