Does Christianity have something to do with Shawn's question? — Michael
I don't know what you mean by this. — Michael
But so is not the opinion that we must choose YHWH to be the person we talk about. That is even less relevant. — god must be atheist
Excluding other religions on the basis of a bias. — god must be atheist
Then, assume YHWH, then. — Shawn
Something is Yahweh iff it is the being that created the world as described in Genesis. Science has proved that the world wasn't created as described in Genesis. Therefore, nothing is Yahweh. Therefore, Yahweh doesn't exist. — Michael
If refuting God was so easy you'd wonder why so many people still take it as true. (Genesis and God) — Shawn
Mind you, I didn't come into this thread as a religious person — Shawn
Mind you, I didn't come into this thread as a religious person. — Shawn
If refuting God was so easy you'd wonder why so many people still take it as true. (Genesis and God) — Shawn
Then why only consider one religion’s God? Do you have in mind some God that isn’t tied to a specific scripture? — Michael
Why is it that neither science nor logic can disprove God? — Shawn
Why is it that neither science nor logic can disprove God?
— Shawn
Something unscientific and illogical about God perhaps. — TheMadFool
Not illogical. The faith in god is unassailable by logic. — god must be atheist
But unscientific, yes. Science is based on evidence. — god must be atheist
That's not completely on point is it? — TheMadFool
I can't seem to parse this sentence. What do you mean "faith in god is unassailable by logic"? In my book it means "faith in god" is illogical and that's why it is, in your words, "unassailable by logic"! — TheMadFool
The more we talk to nature using a scientific approach the more we realize nature doesn't care about "us" and the more the idea of "God" loses any importance at all. — Raul
requires nature to care about us , given that the nature we encounter is partly a result of our own constructions and behaviors. This pragmatism is far removed
from a God centered thinking. — Joshs
So you say that enactivism considers "us" outside nature? Another kind of dualism? That is not what enactivism is about. — Raul
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.