• TiredThinker
    831
    We always try to gauge what we deserve and what others deserve, but how is any such thing measured objectively? Do we deal in just more or less than one another or can we find real world measurable things to compare in reference to deservingness? We certainly live different lives and experience different outcomes, but can we ever really determine we deserve our lot in life?
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    Deserving is about justice.

    LaXEsKL7O-WVNT3XFfA45PN7zSVqOObmJwrr2GrRjrKBSF7iIu0tuclYaxbIcRRUqI1vL03lNH7rYe0hhT7sQdl_RIzIobP7tQc-zO3hdRmm9xBl1GgJG4PyhYqotR8CVecpIFVtRzoGsQ
  • Miller
    158
    We always try to gauge what we deserve and what others deserveTiredThinker

    you deserve the freedom to be human, which includes fair trade of work and goods
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    When we talk about deserving, we're interested in how well a person is suited for a position, position understood in the broadest sense possible. For example if you want to be a manager in an organization, you'll have to show that you deserve that position. I guess it boils down to showing people that you fit the bill, you're just what the doctor ordered and so on. Likewise, if you want to be someone's husband, you'll have to prove you're life-partner material.

    I suppose there's an element of justice involved - one must evaluate (judge) who/what deserves whom/what. There's also fairness, another concept allied to justice, to consider. May the best man win! Meritocracy is the cornerstone of deservedness.

    To mess up this fantatastic system, guaranteed to make both winners and losers happy/content, we have the deadly duo: lady luck and nepotism.

    Fortune Favors the prepared mind. — Louis Pasteur

    Fortune Favors the bold. — Some Guy
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    Hi there! I'm afraid you lost your post-a-picture privilege.
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    Nobody deserves anything. :mask:

    "Imagine Sisyphus happy – amor fati!"
  • Book273
    768
    Deserve is an attempt to justify some sort of position or judgement. I agree with 180Proof: Nobody deserves anything.
  • john27
    693


    What about that science teacher who gave me a 70 instead of a 90 on my project in sixth grade because he thought it would push me harder? Wouldn't I be deserving of a 90?
  • Paine
    2.4k
    We always try to gauge what we deserve and what others deserve, but how is any such thing measured objectively?TiredThinker

    I am not sure what the 'we', presented by you amounts to. If you are referring to the laws set up to arbitrate disputes between various claims of right and injury, the possibility that arbitrary decisions will be made without regard to more refined senses of justice is exactly why those institutions came into being.

    'We' came to a limit to what could be understood in the dealings between persons and came up with a system to carry on despite that insight not being available to an 'us.'
  • L'éléphant
    1.5k
    Nobody deserves anything180 Proof
    Even criminals who committed heinous crimes?
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    Nobody. We get what we take or cannot avoid.
  • L'éléphant
    1.5k
    Nobody.180 Proof
    So nobody deserves a punishment?
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    Only if they can't avoid it.
  • L'éléphant
    1.5k
    Only if they can't avoid it.180 Proof
    Who are they? And if they can't avoid it? What does it mean?
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    Who are they? And if they can't avoid it? What does it mean?L'éléphant

    "They" is anyone. If "they" can't avoid it then "they" suffer the punishment. It means different things to different people. I just don't like the word "deserve." Some equate it with justice, or karma, or whatever. On the non-punishment side, some folks say X deserves to be treated positively. Or everyone deserves a medal. But all that entails judgement. And judgement is subjective. And shouldn't all judgement be placed into the context of an entire life, instead of one or more incidents? And who knows the entire life of another?

    Does a deer "deserve" to be torn apart and eaten alive by a pack of wolves? No. But it doesn't not deserve it either. What about the pups back in the den? Do they deserve to eat? What differentiates the intraspecific relations of man from the inter- or intraspecific relations of any other animal(s)?

    "Deserves got nothing to do with it." William Muny. It's just life. "Fair" is a subjective creation of our heart, sometimes shared, sometimes written, sometimes not.
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    The "they" you referred to in the post to which I'd replied.

    "Deserves got nothing to do with it." William Muny.James Riley
    :fire: :cool:
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    Nobody deserves anything. :mask:180 Proof

    :lol: :up: We're all a bunch of underseving lucky/unlucky bastards & bitches.
  • unenlightened
    9.2k
    Society is just. Therefore: --
    One deserves one's privilege.
    One is lucky to get by.
    The poor are always undeserving.
    OR ...
    Deserts in practice are about morality, not justice. We are all sinners and deserve hell but are redeemed by Christ. Everyone deserves a little kindness from their fellow sinners, and sinners are redeemed by the kindness they show their fellows through Christ.

    Nobody deserves anything. :mask:
    — 180 Proof

    :lol: :up: We're all a bunch of underseving lucky/unlucky bastards & bitches.
    Agent Smith

    This is a recipe for irresponsibility and social collapse, much favoured by philosophers, and promulgated by the rich.
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    This is a recipe for irresponsibility and social collapse, much favoured by philosophers, and promulgated by the rich.unenlightened

    That doesn't make it false.
  • unenlightened
    9.2k
    Indeed it doesn't. Neither does it make it even truth-apt. The decision is not between true and false here, but between forms of life. The red pill and the blue pill are both part of the same cinematic fiction. If good and evil are fictions, then the truth has no value either.
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    Indeed it doesn't. Neither does it make it even truth-apt. The decision is not between true and false here, but between forms of life. The red pill and the blue pill are both part of the same cinematic fiction. If good and evil are fictions, then the truth has no value either.unenlightened

    So, the domain of discourse isn't truth. Are we then discussing utility? Something else perhaps? Made-up worlds which we've constructed from scratch - mindscapes/ideaverses - which we then overlay on the world to, in a sense, make it human-friendly, more pro-life than it actually is. Imagined orders (vide Yuval Noah Harari)? Interesting to say the least. It's not about truth then, yet you talk of red pill/blue pill.

    Good and evil are, quite possibly, (over)simplifications - thinking in binary (usually) makes life much easier. The clarity that it offers (yes/no, no maybe) must come at a price though but many, it seems, can afford it.
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    If good and evil are fictions, then the truth has no value either.unenlightened

    I disagree. I think that good and evil are subjective, and individual choice can be informed by truth. It's the idea that there must be some collective human agreement on what is good and what is evil that creates the rub. Even then, the collective can agree on something as good or evil without it being objectively so. That is where we get these funny notions of "justice" and "morality." These are legal or ethical fictions that, like truth, inform our conduct. But there is no objective deserve.
  • TiredThinker
    831
    I wasn't so much concerned with institutions as the judgement of people is full of folly and is pretty subjective. In the case of a man that everyone thinks is more than deserving of a particular woman, if the woman is the only one that disagrees, that shows outcomes and deserving are certainly not tied together and not very objective when it comes to society and the way things tend to go. But lets say there were two identical twins in two separate near identical universes (so they don't affect one another). But one suffers a car crash and the other doesn't. Lets assume no other major entropy afterwards. One lives a life of pain and disability and the other doesn't. Certainly not fair nor deserved? Or lets say the disabled one does have additional changes? Loss of income, ends up in a more dangerous neighborhood to afford a place, maybe loses friends that were connected by more active lifestyle? Also undeserving? Can deserving only be assessed by the divine?
  • unenlightened
    9.2k
    I disagree.James Riley

    Wot me worry? If there are no values, there is no value to truth, and never mind the bollocks of object and subject.
  • unenlightened
    9.2k
    This is a reductio. If you post on a philosophy forum, you value truth. Indeed to participate in communication at all is to value truth. To value logic is to value truth preservation, and the reality of values is demonstrated daily on this site. There is a moral inequality between truth and falsehood that is a fact of life. If you think it is an arbitrary distinction that is a matter of preference, you are as wrong as if you think a broken clock is just as good as working clock. Language does not work unless there is this inequality between truth and falsehood.
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    If there are no values, there is no value to truth, and never mind the bollocks of object and subject.unenlightened

    You equate a lack of communal agreement on values with a lack of individual (subjective) appreciation of values. That is not the case. Just because I don't share your values doesn't mean I don't have any.
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    If you think it is an arbitrary distinction that is a matter of preference, you are as wrongunenlightened

    If you disagree with unenlightened, you are wrong. :lol:
  • unenlightened
    9.2k
    Just because I don't share your values doesn't mean I don't have any.James Riley

    I have no reason to believe you. and nothing more to say.
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    I have no reason to believe you. and nothing more to say.unenlightened

    You just made my point against your point regarding the subjectivity of value.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.