How do you know this?
You didn't answer. I prodded you - this isn't a rhetorical question. — karl stone
Look at this shit: — karl stone
You have fought a good fight, though you may not have finished your course, yet, you have kept the faith. Henceforth there is laid up for you a crown of righteousness.
that can operate in a high temperature environment — karl stone
If you're not interested in the subject could you leave me alone please. — karl stone
Do you imagine anyone will see my post now it's buried beneath a heap of your misunderstanding and regret? — karl stone
If only mine were; you don't see it of course - but they're stalling. I mentioned earlier KMT cannot achieve what NASA reported they could do 40 years ago regarding locating magma deposits, materials survivability etc - and here Quaise want to drill using "millimeter wave drilling technology" to depths of 20km.
In Janurary 2020 - a paper reviewing experimental achievements in the development of high-power gyrotron oscillators wrote:
"The world record parameters of the European tube are as follows: 0.92 MW output power at 30-min pulse duration, 97.5% Gaussian mode purity, and 44% efficiency..."
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JIMTW..41....1T/abstract
Less that 2 years later this technology has been perfected, and is in the hands of a geothermal energy drilling start-up run by a former oil company executive? More astonishingly still they either imagine a machine slim enough to lower down a bore hole, that can operate in a high temperature environment, or that can be focused into a cutting beam at a distance of 20 km. In short, they have phasers worthy of the Starship Enterprise, and are using them for domestic purposes. Yeah, right! — karl stone
Having demonstrated your inability to comprehend what you read, may I suggest you go to bed before you become too stupid to write english words! — karl stone
The problem with writing engineering solutions on toilet walls is that the bandwidth is so narrow, and you have to get into the right toilets in the first place. — Bitter Crank
Magma energy technology was proven viable by NASA 40 years ago - I've shown you proof of that. In that report, NASA claimed to be able to do thing KMT (iceland) say now they are unable to do. I've shown you proof of that. Now I'm saying that Quaise are drilling to unnecessary depths; twice as deep as the world's deepest hole, using a drill that cannot concievably exist. Are you saying that sounds at all like they're keen to develop this source of energy? Or are they throwing obstacles in the way? — karl stone
Most interesting. — Ms. Marple
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.