I think you are misinterpreting some of what I'm trying to say. It isn't about the END OF CHINA but more about the END OF THE CURRENT WAY CHINA DOES THINGS. Or in other words China will some time in the future need some kind of paradigm shift in order to properly adjust to the way things are done in the modern world. This isn't all that shocking when you think about it since both the US as well as other countries will likely need a kind of paradigm shift in order to operate effectively in the modern world as well as things become more complicated in the future.China is and will never be done. They survived the revolution of Mao, the starvation crisis of 60's, and the financial problems of the 80's and 90's. Sooner or later they end up searching a solution for the problems. We should not say "they will not last this decade". It is extreme. Keep in mind that despite they are not a democracy at least the National People's Congress is responsible. This is why they always survived from all the problems: Because their philosophy is being courageous in hard times and the principles points of Confucianism and Taoism. These doctrines are centuries years old they still remain.
Xi Jinping has something that no Western leader does: Rectitude. — javi2541997
Rectitude? Following the principles of Confucianism and Taoism? I disagree with your assessment of Xi Jinping and those following him.This is why they always survived from all the problems: Because their philosophy is being courageous in hard times and the principles points of Confucianism and Taoism. These doctrines are centuries years old they still remain.
Xi Jinping has something that no Western leader does: Rectitude. — javi2541997
What is likely going to happen is that the population of China will get a lot smaller.I think you are misinterpreting some of what I'm trying to say. It isn't about the END OF CHINA but more about the END OF THE CURRENT WAY CHINA DOES THINGS. — dclements
Maybe I have be a bit "brainwashed" by western media, but I kind of find it hard to imagine Xi Jinping as a kind of nice/benevolent leader when he is constantly making threats at any and all countries who are not willing to any and all things he wants them to do. It is one thing to bully your own people around, it is another when you think it is "ok" to bully people who are not citizens of your own country. — dclements
Rectitude? Following the principles of Confucianism and Taoism? I disagree with your assessment of Xi Jinping and those following him. — dclements
It basically about how Xi Jinping is trying to run his country through a cult of personality, and since he has gotten rid of anyone and everyone who is able to say anything about how he runs things he has effectively turn the rest of the leadership in China into nothing more than a bunch of bobble heads. — dclements
Yet, if you read the news, it doesn't look all that bad, but who trusts the media these days? — Agent Smith
Agreed. News and media are in their worst time. They spread lies without any type of consideration. I no longer trust on journalism and I feel sceptical about all the news which come from China or Xi Jinping — javi2541997
Yet how many years have there been this idea of that the European Union is finished? Or China is finished?
The fact is, country simply aren't finished. They can have a huge crisis, but they aren't finished. I think even Sri Lanka isn't finished. Even Somalia isn't finished, it seems to just hang on there... somehow. And actually, might be more than just hanging on. — ssu
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.