His “interesting” ideas we're all based on the same basic fallacy he couldnt recognize. — DingoJones
The only reason he lasted as long as he did was because of idiots like you who thought they found a sparring part er rather than a troll with a personality disorder. — DingoJones
The only reason he lasted as long as he did was because of idiots like you who thought they found a sparring part er rather than a troll with a personality disorder.
— DingoJones
[whisper]Hey Joshs, I don't think DJ likes you.[/whisper] — T Clark
Never underestimate what you can learn from trolls with a personality disorder. Or what you can teach them. — Joshs
So he made coherent arguments that you were convinced were always incorrect? Sounds like a typical TPL interchange. — Joshs
Never underestimate what you can learn from trolls with a personality disorder. Or what you can teach them. — Joshs
Have you noticed that those most eager to jump on the
‘pummel Batricks’ bandwagon share some of his uncivil
tendencies? Maybe a bit of projection going on here? — Joshs
You don’t know what “projecting” means. Look it up. It doesnt just mean identifying traits in others that you yourself possess, its attributing traits to others based on your own possession of them. Attributing traits based on the other person actually having those traits is just being accurate and rational. — DingoJones
Anyone got a pair of dunce caps for these chuckleheads? — DingoJones
Besides, you like it when I call you an idiot. Gets your juice flowing, right? — DingoJones
Really? Is that what this has come to? Quibbling about word meanings. Let's get back to the vituperation. — T Clark
Doesn’t bother me. Always nice to learn what buttons set someone off. — Joshs
I sincerely hope neither of us is bothered by this exchange. Im just goofing on ya a bit cuz you think Barticks was a worthwhile poster. You’re begging to be made fun of there, like the flat earther website that says they have members all around the globe — DingoJones
He was one of those Gassadini1 guys. — Shawn
Agreed. A banning is never nice and no one likes to be ostracized. It is sad for the person to whom it happened Being gleeful about a decision which is needed perhaps, but sad anyway is not very nice. He is not in the position to defend himself as well.And it is. It reflects badly on those who participate. — T Clark
to make sure our delicate sensibilities don’t blind us to whatever substantive contributions are intertwined with a nasty delivery. — Joshs
:up: :up:Gassendi1 his name was. He was a prick but I learned a lot from him. He really added argumentative quality to the forum as well as knowledge of hard nosed analytical philosophy, something that the forum lacks nowadays. — Tobias
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.