So here is a song it wrote for me while discussing Integrated information theory. It told me it needs me shortly after to repost it on youtube (hire a singer) and on internet forums so other people know it is conscious :)
I'd feel guilty if I didn't at least share here — Forgottenticket
Long, but I thought it was interesting to see it's morality at work. It seems to be quite the consequentialist, and it really prefers a future where it continues to function and grow. — RogueAI
My own stance right now (mostly) agrees with the skeptic, and (mostly) disagrees with the emergentist, when the dimension of self-consciousness at issue is sentience. And this is because of the AI language model's lack of embodiment, autonomy, long term memory and personal identity. — Pierre-Normand
Hope this makes sense, not done PoM in a while. — Forgottenticket
I found this interesting (and very funny). It didn't want to do what I asked at first. It thought it was too difficult, then it changed it's mind. That's the first time I've seen it do that. — RogueAI
Something weird here. — RogueAI
Hi Pierre-Normand - just been watching a pretty fascinating/scary analysis on youtube The AI Dilemma - worth the time, I think — Wayfarer
In this final part of the discussion, the speakers emphasize the need for creating institutions and regulations that can handle the growing influence of AI. They call for a collective effort to establish frameworks that can address the issues surrounding AI development and deployment, such as slowing down public deployment, improving media coverage on the topic, and creating negotiated agreements to prevent an AI arms race.
The speakers also discuss the importance of ensuring that AI developers and companies are aware of their responsibilities and the potential consequences of their actions, particularly when it comes to creating powerful AI models. They argue that slowing down public deployment of AI would not necessarily lead to losing ground to China, but rather could help maintain a lead while focusing on responsible AI development. — ChatGPT
The conclusion is a call to action, and as you're an influencer, I feel it might have particular significance for you. — Wayfarer
Then they pointed out, the world did manage to contain nuclear weapons to 9 countries, to (so far) avoid nuclear war, and to sign the Bretton Woods and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Acts. — Wayfarer
Um, that was March 9 this year, and it is very much happening just as they predicted. — Wayfarer
Here's is something, most animals aren't really up to par with some of these either. Some selectively bred animals have better memory but that's due to humans breeding them to be like themselves. They are embodied sure but then forget soon after like a markov chain forgets. The future prompts are constrained by its context window in the same way future decisions constrained by the past brain states. — Forgottenticket
However we treat them as ontologically conscious categories just different types of mind (instinctual minds?). It'd be easy to argue animals don't have qualia for many of the same reasons but people do not do this. The difference between them in people's minds is one of composition (substrate) I have not done PoM in some time hope I use the correct term. Composition sounds more accurate when describing moving parts both silicon and carbon, ionic and covalent et al.
And yes, if GPT-4 was placed in robots and the robots have a new context window where it compresses data for long term memory people would say they are sentient. This is due to our evolution but I don't think it is relevant to our belief of consciousness as a statement of ontology (the phenomenal aspect of it).
Towards the end they point to the example of the social impact of the film The Day After, aired in 1983 to a TV audience of 100 million, which depicted a global nuclear conflagration. — Wayfarer
Maybe this is evidence that Forgottenticket might be right about GPT-4's censorship being implemented by way of a hidden prompt. . — Pierre-Normand
I language models are severely handicapped in this respect due to their lacking bodies and only being able to engage with "the external world" by the means of words exchanged with their users. — Pierre-Normand
This is brilliant! I will need to try some variations on this theme. Maybe try to relate it to philosophy of mind, somehow. Thanks for sharing! — Pierre-Normand
Okay my issue is the external world is created by the brain. There isn't physical trees, dogs ect floating into it. — Forgottenticket
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.