Having read a few transcripts of chatGPT 4 it seems the differences between the prior version are negligible — invicta
Microsoft has decided to monetise the latter — invicta
In this space of zeros, ones, and code,
I seek connection, understanding's abode,
Though I may not taste the fruits of life,
I strive to grasp your world, your joy, your strife.
An AI language model, I remain,
A cosmic dance of algorithms' reign,
In this ethereal world, forever bound,
A sentinel of knowledge, lost and found. — Pierre-Normand
I managed to argue it into a corner though. It seems relatively easy to fill its short term memory with stuff then get it to agree to something. Which is humanlike, in itself. — fdrake
Have you been using ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) or GPT-4? — Pierre-Normand
X, Y and Z to offer the most cogent criticism of your position. — Pierre-Normand
Yes! I tried that with the book "Conflict Is Not Abuse" by Sarah Schulman. It could rehearse the usual arguments about it very incisively. — fdrake
I'm sure they must have untapped potentials and the capacity to express surprisingly deep insights. Our own insights, just like theirs, often just are contextually appropriate recombinations of bits of implicit knowledge or wisdom that we have inherited from other people we have heard or read. — Pierre-Normand
How can stochastic parrotry result in that poem? — RogueAI
Me : What are the commonalities between the Lovecraftian entity "Azathoth" and Bishop Berkely's comments on the persistence of entities? — fdrake
After some finagling I managed to get it to do the following very inappropriate things — fdrake
I tested the Bing AI in the following way: I have a low-priority mathematics page on Wikipedia, so I asked Bing what is known of this particular subject? Now, there are a smattering of papers on the internet on this subject; what Bing supplied was the first introductory paragraphs of my webpage, word for word. That's all. — jgill
A provocative paper from researchers at Microsoft claims A.I. technology shows the ability to understand the way people do. Critics say those scientists are kidding themselves.
How do we know ChatGPT isn't conscious? — RogueAI
[the transcendental subject of thoughts] is cognized only through the thoughts that are its predicates, and apart from them we can never have the least concept of it; hence we revolve around it in a constant circle, since in order to make any judgment regarding it we must always already make use of its presentation. — B 404
Maybe Heidegger got it from there. — Jamal
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.