Those words do not imply rules have been broken. You’re starting to spread disinfo now. — NOS4A2
So we need some fraud, some dishonesty, or unfair dealings. It appears none of that exists.
Durham makes no allegation of a "two-tiered" system. What he said was this:Further, [Durham] writes of the two-tiered system. He writes: “Unlike the FBI’s opening of a full investigation of unknown members of the Trump campaign based on raw, uncorroborated information, in this separate matter involving a purported Clinton campaign plan, the FBI never opened any type of inquiry — NOS4A2
Genetic fallacy. The Times article merely fills in a bit of context about the Russian disinformation memos:Read about it in this New York Times article! Let me guess, unnamed sources, current and former officials, — NOS4A2
As usual, you're repeating Trump-campaign propoganda.It’s unfair to replace a candidate from a race because you’re losing, especially against the will of the voters, and it’s dishonest and fraudulent to say you’ve done so for any other reason as Joe Biden and his surrogates did. — NOS4A2
It’s unfair to replace a candidate from a race because you’re losing, especially against the will of the voters, and it’s dishonest and fraudulent to say you’ve done so for any other reason as Joe Biden and his surrogates did. — NOS4A2
It would be unfair if the Republican party wasn't capable of doing exactly the same thing if they so chose. Since the parties are following the same rules, it's fair.
Do you think it’s fair to the millions who voted for Biden in the primaries? — NOS4A2
Do you think it’s fair to lie about Biden’s abilities up until the moment they couldn’t lie about it any more? — NOS4A2
So let me get this straight. The primary voters chose Biden, then Biden said he wasn't going to run. Now you're verklempt over the disappointment the voters must feel about that. Is that correct?
Who lied, and about what? Give us facts we can check.
That’s wrong. The question at the end of the sentance indicates I was asking you a question. — NOS4A2
Who lied, and about what? Give us facts we can check.
So you have no evidence of unfair practices, rigging, or cheating. Why did you assert it? Did you dream that there was some cheating?
He probably was sharp when Schumer said that. 80 y.o. dudes don't go into dementia like falling off a cliff. Even those closest to him might just suspect at first.
So let me get this straight. The primary voters chose Biden, then Biden said he wasn't going to run. Now you're verklempt over the disappointment the voters must feel about that. Is that correct? — frank
Also consider the implications of the supposed "Clinton Plan": it would have meant that the Campaign was pushing some disinformation about Trump. I admit that I would find this appalling, but a Trump supporter - who embraces and repeats Trump's frequent lies, would be hypocritical to do so.
I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions about why Trump obstructed the investigation. I fully realize you don't care that he did, but how would you defend it to someone who's open-minded? Imagine some other politician being investigated by the FBI, who took steps to silence witnesses - don't you think that would be a major scandal if it came out?
As usual, you're repeating Trump-campaign propoganda.
The fact is that primaries elect delegates, not candidates. No nomination rules were broken and the system is working as designed. If Democrats are unhappy with the way it played out (or Republicans fear this could happen to them) they can push to change the rules (as was done with the prior role of superdelegates). There aren't many Democrats who are upset with the result, though - despite so many Republicans trying to convince them that they should be.
The Trumpsters are pretending that it is a matter of fairness — Fooloso4
He has no handlers because he cannot be handled. He cannot even control himself. — Fooloso4
Do we now just say this process didn’t matter? — NOS4A2
Typical Trumpist propoganda, which I've previously disabused you of.The steele dossier. It was bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign. It worked exactly as they intended. — NOS4A2
That's laughable. Are all investigations unjust when hindsight shows the person was innocent? In this case, there's not even a rational basis to claim Trump was proven innocent - because Trump's obstruction was successful: who knows what Manafort may have revealed had he not been promised a pardon? And no, I'm not insisting Trump conspired with Russia, but it would be false to claim he was proven innocent. His obstruction undermined the investigation and thus tainted the conclusion. If there weren't so many bigger crimes by Trump, it would be a worthwhile campaign issue for Dems.If he did obstruct the investigation, it was because it was an unjust investigation. Obstruction of justice is wrong, Obstruction of injustice is laudable. — NOS4A2
The fact is that primaries elect delegates, not candidates. No nomination rules were broken and the system is working as designed.
I had neither heard nor read Biden's statement. I stated something I believe to be factual based on m own analysis: the process was followed, no rules were broken. You didn't dispute that.as usual you’re spouting DNC and big donor propaganda. — NOS4A2
Typical Trumpist propoganda, which I've previously disabused you of.
That's laughable. Are all investigations unjust when hindsight shows the person was innocent? In this case, there's not even a rational basis to claim Trump was proven innocent - because Trump's obstruction was successful
I had neither heard nor read Biden's statement. I stated something I believe to be factual based on m own analysis: the process was followed, no rules were broken. You didn't dispute that.
The steele dossier. It was bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign. It worked exactly as they intended. — NOS4A2
Typical Trumpist propoganda, which I've previously disabused you of. — Relativist
That’s the only thing you can say and it’s taken place of your arguments. Keep telling yourself that, if it helps. But you have nothing to dispute it. — NOS4A2
So the "propoganda I was referring to was the falsehood that the Clinton campaign wanted to make stuff up about Trump and that they used this in the campaign. That is categorically false.
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.