• javi2541997
    6.2k
    I share it anyway:

    @T Clark If you are using a mobile or similar device, switch the screen to "desktop" or whatever it is called in English.

    Screenshot-20250405-185201-Chrome.jpg
  • T Clark
    14.5k
    If you are using a mobile or similar device, switch the screen to "desktop" or whatever it is called in English.javi2541997

    it's clear on the home page on desktop. Not so easy to find on mobileflannel jesus



    Thanks y'all. Yes, I was using my mobile. I found it on my computer. Javi - I looked for the "desktop" switch on my phone but I don't see it.

    0.88
  • T Clark
    14.5k


    Does this violate the new no embedding rule? Probably.
  • praxis
    6.6k


    If you’re suggesting that my post lacks substance I’ll have you know that the image is a meditation on freedom, violence, and authenticity in a world emptied of clear moral direction. It echoes Nietzsche’s self-authoring hero, Sartre’s free agent, Camus’ absurd man, and Baudrillard’s hyperreal cowboy — all wrapped in a squint and a poncho.
  • T Clark
    14.5k
    the image is a meditation on freedom, violence, and authenticity in a world emptied of clear moral direction. It echoes Nietzsche’s self-authoring hero, Sartre’s free agent, Camus’ absurd man, and Baudrillard’s hyperreal cowboypraxis

    Yes, I know all that, but I still think it violates the new policy. Let's ask the moderators. Wait...no...let's not.
  • DifferentiatingEgg
    570
    Is this like karma farming? Lol, whatever it is it's dumb as it doesn't take in account threads created with total comments under them. Any many other statistics. Mostly just an exercise in massaging an ego.

    Now we know Banno, whilst at the hinge of submitting something is pondering how many replies he can get with every post. :lol: Fragility.
  • Quk
    83
    it's dumb as it doesn't take in account threads created with total comments under themDifferentiatingEgg

    I don't take this thread seriously, and I don't want to defend it, but I want to reply to that particular thought quoted above: I think a thread gets its own life; users talk with each other, inspire each other, no matter whether the original poster keeps participating or not. So it's not just the OP that triggers the spark; all users in that thread do that. And when they reply to a comment, they usually mention the respective user which may be the thread starter or any other user in the thread. So there's the "mention" function again.
  • DifferentiatingEgg
    570
    I wonder how many mentions you get for the houra spent moderating the forums or whatever other work one may be doing... oh practically 0. But without the higher mention ratio... they obviously haven't contributed.
  • Quk
    83
    What about the workers in the mines that deliver all the silicon which will be used in the computer chips that host this website? Do we mention them? No. I think we should. -- I just did it.
  • Hanover
    13.5k
    I'm 1.05.

    In real life, my email and text received to response ratio is much higher because I typically ignore emails and texts, except when it's important, and then I call them back.
  • Christoffer
    2.3k


    1,04

    What's the prize?

    On the other hand, it can also be telling of how many times I've been baited to respond. I've of late been better at just leaving conversations that go nowhere or not responding to people who are clearly not an important waste of my time.

    I'm 1.05.Hanover

    Yey, the 1,0... somethingers-club :strong:
12345Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.

×
We use cookies and similar methods to recognize visitors and remember their preferences.