If he did I'm flattered :lol: — john27
Oops! No, that was Socrates: "Ordinary people seem not to realize that those who really apply themselves in the right way to philosophy are directly and of their own accord preparing themselves for dying and death. If this is true, and they have actually been looking forward to death all their lives..."
This is not what nihilism is, based on the definition I provided above. — Alkis Piskas
I don't think those are mutually exclusive definitions. I think meaninglessness is a product of purpose-giving ideas being baseless. This is from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated."
Believing in universal and objective values, maybe do not give life a meaning but make it stronger, more solid. Such values are based on logic (rational thinking), which is the best tool that Man disposes and which makes them mentally healthy human beings. This must be never underestimated! — Alkis Piskas
I agree that it makes life a lot better. It provides somewhat of a foundation. I'm not sure that rationality leads to happiness though. On the contrary, the smartest people I've known are usually not the happiest. Schopenhauer was brilliant, but he was far from happy.
I do agree, though, that meaning and purpose are subjective. They are what you make them.
It became like a bell that would be sounded whenever I thought about doing something, letting me know what a waste of effort it would be. — Judaka
Exactly! I used to be very prolific, but now I don't do anything.
I'm going to spend more time thinking about this. I like your wording: "possessed by nihilism."
If you dance, do you want get from one place to another ? Or are you enjoying a movement
If you listen a good music, do you want music to get to the end fast ? Or you enjoying it in process ? — Nothing
I agree that the solution is to enjoy the process. Recognizing that is the first step. Now it's a matter of how exactly to go about it.
Oh yes, I'm familiar with Camus. “There is only one really serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide."
Yes, if given the choice to feel better, I would make it. Taking time daily to learn about the mind and yourself can get exhausting though. Usually I have introspective periods scattered throughout my day, and sometimes my effort is more concerted. I want answers and I'm spending time looking for them.
There are many intellectual paths one could take in life, however your subconscious is now telling you that yours has led you to a dead end and it's telling you through depression.
A nihilistic philosophy is almost certain to be dissonant with the human experience. Humans simply experience things as having value, whether we're able to objectively confirm that or not. — Tzeentch
I agree with this 100%.
Perhaps an interesting thought could be, why you prefer to take a nihilistic outlook on life, which is just as uncertain of a supposition as an outlook that claims things do have value. — Tzeentch
I think agnosticism implies equal likelihood, which I disagree with. I'm inclined to have nihilistic views because that makes the most sense. This is clearly not based on utility, as nihilism is inherently destructive. There are some life-promoting branches, like absurdism, but in general all arrows point toward suicide.
I've yet to meet a person whose professed views entirely contradict their lived experience in which it does not lead to them becoming miserable. — Tzeentch
That is very true!
You want a legacy but are guaranteed none. — Kenosha Kid
I think including that part in the OP was a little misleading. Legacy to me is meaningless because it implies that value comes from recognition, which seems absurd to me. I would say that value absolutely does not depend on recognition (or being remembered). Also, without exception, everybody is eventually forgotten.