Comments

  • What is a Fact?
    Some even participate.Wheatley

    That's how true theatre should be.
  • What is a Fact?
    I think you're right. It's the public who decide what a "facts" is, not armchair philosophers.Wheatley

    The public merely observes. Swallowing everything that is served swallow-ready, without chewing, unconsciously digesting only. Who serves?
  • What is a Fact?
    for Oliver5 there is no distinction between facts and what we take to be factsJanus

    @Olivier5 is right. A fact is a fact because our theories make them a fact. I'm not talking about lying, which can be done in every culture.

    How else can it be? Observations and theory can't be separated. Pure observation is an illusion. Even the perception of a pure color is problematic. There are no "bundles of perception" which we can arbitralily select in the creative process, as Einstein claims.
  • You are not your body!


    Do you consider the brain as part of you. Or do you possess it?
  • Is there something like AS, artificial stupidity?
    No. People don't hold back a quality because it hasn't been "implemented" yet.Caldwell

    I'm not so sure. People have many inculculated abilities. Hidden somewhere in our foreheads. Held back by many because fear, social control (can be associated with fear), authority, lack of self confidence, shyness, or love.
  • Is there something like AS, artificial stupidity?
    Telemarketers and infomercials.Wheatley

    Haha! Good one! Though Im not sure now about my "haha"... :smile:
  • Is there something like AS, artificial stupidity?
    There are no stupid machines, only insufficient onesCaldwell

    Can we say the same of people? I think that it was a dumd card though.
  • You are not your body!
    This is the "you" which, indeed, is not your body, but is so much more...Michael Zwingli

    The so much more lays inside my brain and the outside world.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Christianity was largely responsible for the destruction of classical literature,Banno

    Can you blame them after what Roman empire did to them? Sometimes only a Jesus can turn his other cheeck. Im not sure they were eaten asinging by the lions. Alife yes.
  • The Decay of Science
    Careful of contrarian ideas, or you'll end up on the moderators radar.Wheatley

    Gotcha! :smile:
  • The Decay of Science
    Okay maybe we did touch on Reich. :cool:Caldwell

    What does the sunglassed smiley mean?
  • The Decay of Science
    Disappointed much?Caldwell

    In you? I don't dare! :smile:
  • The Decay of Science
    You studied a history.Wheatley

    I was about to write the same!
  • The Decay of Science
    Trust me. I studied History and Classics and Philosophy.Caldwell

    So? What should I trust?
  • The Decay of Science
    Good Lord!Caldwell

    I really cant tell if you are serious or not!
  • The Decay of Science
    Wow! I was completely ignorant about the orgone accumulator. :sad:Caldwell

    Wow! Im glad to hear that! How can that be? Its part of US history. And Im not even American! Maybe, though, I know more about the US than about my own country. How can that be?
  • The Decay of Science
    He wrote a treatise about prewar fascism. If Hitler had given some room to his orgone energy, the war would not even be imagined. I'm not an orgone (from organism and orgasm) energy defender (he examined its real existence, what's wrong with that) defender but can relate. The sexual energies are a big piwer (andcthus energy). If I walk outside I love the women but men...? Also but less!

    He helped people with cancer (orgone accumulator). The song "Cloudbusting" is about him. From the persoective of his son.

    And I can go on and on....
  • The Decay of Science


    Luckily, Galileo was given a comfortable position afterwards. Willhelm Reich was unrationaly convicted by science. And his books were burned.His lab destroyed. His stuff forbiden. In 1957. In the US.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Christianity in the fourth and fifth century went out of its way to destroy temples and burnBanno

    I stand corrected...

    Sigh...
  • The Metaphysics of Poetry
    The gods
    In their spotting
    Are the only ones
    Non-rotting
    While every
    eternity
    Bloodery
    Or nitty
    Nor witty
    Rots to the bone
    Their flesh stays young
    Like their every tone
    In the waters of heaven
    In the aromas of hell
    On Stratford on Avon
    In all that they tell
    Their creation runs freely
    At least, so it should
    Like Dan oh so Steely
    Down there under the Hood
    Consider them dead though
    As our friend once proclaimed
    Give it a go bro
    Nihilistically maimed
    Dwelling the Earths
    Undetermined and steady
    Finding love on the road
    Route 66
    Lacks a 6 at the end
    Or at the beginning
    Is it that what they meant
    And made us write down
    The points that we do
    Or faces that frown
    And on and on and on
    On and on and on
    And on and on and on
    And on and on and on it goes
    On and on and on
    Oh and on and on
    Yay bro's
    On and on on tippy toes
    Thankfull am I
    They made it all happen
    That I walk on and by
    Them so I reackon
    I tell them to screw
    Turn the blind eye in them
    The big bangs they blew
    An Inflation divine gem

    All hail to the gods...
    God damn them!
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    His books were burned by science. Is there a law against freely experimenting by a psychceramist?
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Pretty sure I didn't say that. Reich was a Psychceramicist.Banno

    I didn't say you did.
  • The definition of art
    I understand where you are coming from, but strictly speaking, anybody can deem anything to be art.Pop

    One can deem indeed. The real art is to let others think this too

    .
    Art about art, creates a certain reality for art.Pop

    You must convince others first. Your information approach is not accepted by most people.
  • The Decay of Science
    Rationality is at the heart of scientific endeavor.Caldwell

    So it is at the heart of religion. Galileo's conviction was a rational one!
  • You are not your body!
    Yes, but the subjectively reckoned "you", the "I" from your own perspective, is much more than just your body. It is the "I" which results from the constant battle between the primitive "Id" and the idealized "Superego", occurring within the continuously changing context of a feedback loop involving all of your life's experiences. That's a mouthful, is it not!? This is the "you" which, indeed, is not your body, but is so much more...Michael Zwingli

    That's what you think. There is no "superego". Though every brainless body, every I, animal or human, or even bacteria-like (which are only bodies), is super!
  • The definition of art
    . Like describing a fresh spring morning in terms of molecular bondingConstance

    Oh how fresh and anew this springy information structure tickling my sensory forms, making my emotion entropy rocketing skinfo high. My emotional neuronal patterns run bezerk when I breath in these moisty misty forms. Whirlings of bloodflows inside me respond intensely to the morning magic sunlight waves entering me through my glassy eyeball spheres. Projected widely and vast over the retina in full formation. I wished I could make all other structures in formation experience the same conscious patterns I experience in-and outside me, my body structure being their willing and voluntary in-between prisinor. O jah! All formations in the world, rejoyce! And be in!
  • The definition of art
    What about animal art? They build pretty things.
  • The Decay of Science
    Not many physicists here. A pitty.
  • You are not your body!
    of atoms and molecules forming tissues of various types an in a particular pattern as determined by one's DNA code.Michael Zwingli

    That's exactly who I am(except for my central neres, which are inside me)! The DNA though determines only proteins. Nothing more and nothing less.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Ask Hypatia.Banno

    I asked heŕ. She said people abuse religion to excercise their natural will to have power. Once religion (or any other culture, like science) becomes the norm, they can hide behind it. To overpower other people. Like a scientist uses science to impress with their so-called intelligence. Intelligence as a means to power. To keep others, the not-knowing, the non-intelligent, down and feel more than them.

    Not to mention science's intolerance towards the non-scientific.
  • You are not your body!
    Although slow water sounds pretty cool!

    It makes me, my body, move slow when I'm cold.
  • You are not your body!
    Ice is just slow H20, smart guy.praxis

    Ice is ice.
  • Why does economy need growth?
    Capital needs investmentValentinus

    That's basically the same statement as "economy needs growth". Why does capital need investment? To increase it?
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Christianity got there first. It's a consequence of the intolerance inherent in monotheism.Banno

    No. It's the consequence of people being intolerant.
  • You are not your body!
    Except when it's not (as when frozen), of course. :razz:praxis

    Frozen water is called ice. :smile:
  • Anti-Vaxxers, Creationists, 9/11 Truthers, Climate Deniers, Flat-Earthers


    There was a goal once scored here in a soccer game. Protest. The ball alledly went outside the field in the attack. Replay. Unclear. What to do? It took long. Was the ball completely outside the line? Nobody could see. The camera hadn't the right angle. Maybe if there was enough time this could be calculated. What to do? Goal assigned to homeplaying party.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    the tragedy of their rise is the destruction of the literature and art of antiquity.Banno

    No different from some islamians indeed. Or Mohammedians.
  • What is a Fact?
    The trouble here is of course that what counts as a suitable observation is already theoretical - already an interpretation. Observations thus cannot fulfil this role as a foundation to knowledge.Banno

    The trouble here is that you separate theory and observation.
  • You are not your body!
    You may be referring to the tattoos overall form, but given sufficient time that too will change.javra

    Also the butterfly will get wrinkled one day. The one on my arm that is. Unless I die premature...