So you don't deny that it was your mouth that was smelly? :rofl:

The name I have come up with is Sapientinism. — S

Too fucking long to say too often. But as no one will be saying it very often it makes no difference.

I wanted to see whether your vagina was repelling as your personality, but the smell alone answered that question. — S

But you saw that my head was bald, so I don't have a vagina. It must have been the smell of you mouth as it hung open at the size of my equipment.

I think S is sleeping. It's 4:20 in the morning in England. — Purple Pond

Zombies and ghouls don't sleep!

I already knew that because you love the sight of blood. — Purple Pond

Especially his own, a few days a month.

The patch on Sir2u's head? — S

What are you doing look in my pants?

READ is my favourite colour. What's yours? — S

Blurry

I'm sorry, I just do not have the intelligence to interpret the complexities of your argument. — Merkwurdichliebe

Which arguments? I have not made any on this thread, I have only asked questions.

It is likely that these symptoms of stupidity are widespread on TPF, — Merkwurdichliebe

I doubt that it is so wide spread, but some people do seem to be sarcastically disadvantaged.

and that is the reason you are incapable of communicating your points. — Merkwurdichliebe

They usually understand any points I make, even if they pretend not to. When they read them properly at least.

Sapientinism — Purple Pond

Sism.

Do don't not mind him. He doesn't not not know what he's talking about. — S

You guys belong to the same club then?

Sorry, I just read "load of crap" four times and mistook it for a judgment, instead of a 4 different ways to consider this thread. — Merkwurdichliebe

I always find it amazing how so many people fail to READ or even listen to what other people say.

Maybe the others that failed to unlock the secret of my writing would care to look again at what was hidden in plain site and stop judging people without full knowledge.

Sorry for my mistaken assumption. — Merkwurdichliebe

Don't sweat it, I do this for laughs and lots of people fall for it. :wink:

What? — S

I think he meant instillator, he was talking about cavities earlier.

You should give me the benefit of the doubt, I'm currently being overwhelmed by replies to my nonsense here on good old TPF — Merkwurdichliebe

OK, I will ask again.

What did you call crap, and if it is not too much to ask, why did you do it? — Sir2u

Ask me anything, I promise to answer to the best of my ability. — Merkwurdichliebe

You failed miserably to answer the last question, how can I trust you now?

I did — Merkwurdichliebe

What did you call crap, and if it is not too much to ask, why did you do it?

My pappy told me that whenever anyone calls something crap, it means its doo doo, and doo doo is bad 'cause its full'o'germs. — Merkwurdichliebe

Good for your dad, very sensible education he gave you.

But who called anything crap? :gasp:

Wallow in prostration with me. — Wallows

Yeah, move over. :cry:

Now that, I can believe. — S

But you don't know what it is that I don't know, which makes you even worse than me. :lol:

Why do people not bother answering questions here. How can it be the greatest thread ever if no one answers questions.

About what?

So very pessimistic. — Merkwurdichliebe

Why?

In what way do you disagree?

Should This Thread Be Considered?

Considered as in, as in being a load of crap.

Considered as in, believed to be a load of crap.

Considered as in, thought of as being a load of crap.

Considered as in, looked upon as a load of crap.

I don't do not know. :chin:

I don't see how there isn't an extension of thought/intellect/intelligence in a building designed by an architect. — Anaxagoras

A building is the results of his thought process, his thoughts do not continue into the building.

Depends on which humans survive. If a catastrophe happens and people like the Sentinelese survive I doubt we will see technology of our kind again. — Anaxagoras

Someone beat me to the answer.

Why? 10,000 years ago we were all like the Sentinelese. And yet here we are now. — Michael

:up:

OMG Sir! Help! I need your skills my friend! :strong: — ArguingWAristotleTiff

Good evening ma'm, I'm the senior vise president of the company.
We offer free quotes and advice on building methods, experience with flood and earthquake proofing, the best rates in town, and we provide a free pizza delivery for all customs spending more that US$10,00o, and we're open for business 24/7.

How may I help you?

Technology is an extension of man's thought. You destroy that you destroy every trace of man's genius. Again, we are talking about a catastrophe. — Anaxagoras

Technology is the result of man's intelligence/intellect, not an extension of it. Man created the technology from nothing and if humanity one day ends up with no technology then it will start all over again.

What's a Easter? — S

Nice one mate. :cool:

I want to now ask anyone interested in this topic to share the ethical implications you feel having this done to a someone undermines as a private citizen who has Human Rights.

I'm more referring to "vigilante" private citizens. A formed group composed of those whom are technologically proficient and whom may have the resources necessary to hack someone. Their motivation may be to "karmically" punish someone for interests found to be reprehensible and suspect. Invading such an individual's privacy systematically (phone camera, audio, geo-location, online activities, accounts, etc.) being their method of obtaining intimate details.They may then weaponize the information they've gleaned against such an individual.Even though this is considered very unlikely, it's not altogether implausible. — THX1138

As you and others have stated, there are hackers getting information from all kinds of websites and even websites that are set up for the purpose of obtaining information about people then disappearing. Banks have been known to share information about you spending habits. Interactive devices that sit around your house, even your cellphone listens to you. Cameras, public and private follow you around watching what you are doing. You are being monitored, most people that live in even small towns are. You cannot escape it unless you move to the woods.

Is it morally correct to monitor people? That would depend on what was done with the information gained from doing so. Murderers and other criminal have been caught, traffic problems have been prevented from becoming dangerous to motorists, people are being provided with better services when shopping and many other examples of benign use can be shown.

But if the information being garnered was to be used for targeting individuals for financial gain or even for screwing people's lives up just for fun, then that is highly immoral.

Sometimes it takes a decision. Once that's done, it becomes clear it was always a decision - whether one knew it or not. — tim wood

Transgender six year old. Absurd or not? Take a decision.

Don't encourage me to rant, here! — tim wood

I don't encourage anyone to rant, ........................well maybe sometimes. :halo:

It's a bit rich to insist on a detailed project plan at this stage... — Banno

Not really insisting, more like asking if he has any new ideas that are maybe not as well known as those we see in the news papers everyday.
Basically the post is a summary of what most reasonably informed people know already, but they known for years and very little is being done to fix any of the problems.

Supermarkets now want to sell/fine you for using plastic bags, but half of the products you buy are wrapped in one use plastic. And the common person does not give a shit about it.
Not many want to give up their cars and take the bus or the train and it would cause havoc the day even 20% percent of them did actually try.
There are too many people in the world and they are living longer but no one can stop people from having kids. China tried and look what happened to them.
There is not enough food to feed all of the people in some places, but tons of food are thrown away everyday in other places.

Up until now I have heard lots of people saying that something needs to be done, but I have not heard of really feasible plans to do it.

a bit like asking for a second engineer's report when the wing has fallen off. — Banno

My dad used to say that it was like inquiring about the pumps when the officers mess had water on the floor. The bloody ship is sinking.

What's a troll? — S

A supernatural being that usually lives in a cave. That is why we do not see too many of them around here. They hate enlightenment.

Nice to see that even at Easter you are ignoring the Easter eggs. :clap:

I welcome debate. Go ahead. — Nasir Shuja

Congratulations! You are person number 1,000,000,001 to say all of these things.

Please explain how any of the ideas you propose would be carried out. Saying it is one thing, doing it is something else.

Bet you are think that the devil is a troll. :naughty:

It's the whole idea of "cis." — tim wood

At least he made the effort to keep things clear.

And fair chance you think it's an unnecessary absurdity as I do. — tim wood

Whether absurdities are necessary or not I gave up trying to figure out a long time ago. In today's world it is sometimes even difficult to decide if somethings are absurd or not. I start doubting if one still has the ability to distinguish it from the norm. :gasp:

Philosophy doesn't require technology, and technology hasn't advanced philosophy, it's made it less useful. What would a "knowledge and technology catastrophe" look like? — whollyrolling

As you stated, it has already happened. Civilizations have been wiped out with all of there knowledge by barbarian hordes that destroy everything in their path including libraries that contain centuries of information. But the survivors sometimes have started again with the little that was left.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_destroyed_libraries

No it hasn't. I'm talking about a catastrophe with all of our knowledge, and technology as we have today because it is from technology that we have advanced much in philosophical knowledge regarding the world. — Anaxagoras

We have advanced in scientific knowledge but I don't think philosophy has come too far in the last few thousand years. There are new ideas, and as always their respective opposing arguments. There are new perspectives, some of which have come about through technology, but technology and science are separate entities. Whilst they work hand in hand to confound the two is a mistake.
Philosophy and the history of philosophy are two different things, the first is not 100% dependent on the second.
Technology and the history of technology cannot be separated the first is based 100% on the second.

May I - should I - assume Pattern-chaser is being sardonic? — tim wood

Honest I think. :chin:

May a person know what part of speech "cis" is? — tim wood

Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender

Lots of good reading, a few things to laugh about. What more could anyone ask for in a virtual setting.
*****

Awesome, I shall PM you my bank details shortly. — Mr Phil O'Sophy

I am really a Gambian prince with lots of money I need to get out of the country. If you want to help me I will give you 25% of anything you help me with.

Please send me the bank info so that I can make the withdrawals deposits to your account.