:fire:The story i am telling here is that the preservation of the story - of the self - is of no importance; what matters is the completion of the story, in which once is for all. — unenlightened
No. "God" is only a word (i.e. an empty name).Question: is god pure mind and physicality a manifestation or manipulation of energy? — simplyG
The only answer to the ultimate why question that does not beg the question, kids, is that There Is No Answer. — (Ecclesiastes 20:23)
What exactly would a modern ‘Luddite’ aim to destroy? — I like sushi
In 1965, Frank Herbert called it "The Butlerian Jihad".One could smash the machines -- assembly plants, refineries, computers, telecommunications, etc. That stuff is sitting out in plain sight. — BC
:up:WTF is wrong with the Dems? Biden is six years my junior and I can tell you someone that age should not be president. And then there is VP Harris. — jgill
2. Miami, Federal indictment 8Jun23 :up:The timeline of MAGA Loser #1's legal reckoning for his 2016-2023 crime spree (excluding potentially ruinous civil lawsuits) is taking a definite shape:
1. NYC felony indictment 31Mar23 :up:
"34 counts of Business Documents Fraud Crealing and/or Covering-up Felonies", etc
https://apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-full-document-640043319549?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=RelatedStories&utm_campaign=position_02
[ ... ] — 180 Proof
Both. :smirk:Is Žižek a serious philosopher or a stand up comedian? Or both? — Tom Storm
Maybe for 'idealists in analysis' ...Is his work on Hegel or Lacan useful?
Lacanian-Hegelian Marxist (and so on and so on...)Can he really be considered a Hegelo-Lacanian?
I don't think Žižek is p0m0 at all. For me, his most philosophically significant works are these:Where would he sit in the context of a post-modern tradition and what would be his most significant works?
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/811827It was all laid out in the op and not a word has been said against it that I have seen. — unenlightened
Discursive metacognition.What are the defining features of being a human? — Andrew4Handel
As a species, we produce knowledge by which we ratchet-up ourselves out from every ecological niche we've inhabited (so far).Do you believe that there are any unique human traits?
Outies and Innies (i.e. yin and yang).Are there sex differences that give us a different embodiment experience or sexed perspective on being human?
Natality-desire-mortality & reasoning.Or do men and women have some fundamental human traits making our experiences likely very similar?
Possibly but only if each individual is a member of a different species.What about the possibly infinite diversity of individual subjective experience? Could we all be having profoundly unique and unmatched experiences?
False equivalence (like anti-fascism "is as bad as" fascism ... anti-sexism "is as bad as" sexism...) :roll:To put it plainly, an anti-theocracy is as bad as a theocracy. — Janus
I agree ...Enformationism is an attempt to disguise religious beliefs with a scientific cloak. — Gnomon
For whom? Not scientists (because it's not even a scientific problem).This is the hard problem. — Benj96
(Model-dependent) realism? or classical atomism?What might we say about object - object interaction? — Benj96
I suspect most want to, but not enough can.What percentage of the population do you think can, and wants to, think for itself? — Janus
"Subject-Object"scientific method/objectivity — Benj96
'Subject-Subject"faith/belief/spirituality/Gods
'Social-Social"ethics/immorality
Broadly – instrumentalism? idealism? & pragmatism? respectively.How do we tie this into different philosophical schools of thought?
:100:I do not agree with your [@Gnomon's] supposition that the information theory -- under the protection of science -- could actually be a metaphysical view. This is an abuse of philosophy. — L'éléphant
Not at all. I extrapolated from your "dogma" :smirk:And so that's your dogma ... — Hanover
So even should a belief in God be entirely delusional, if it should lead to greater happiness, and should its disbelief lead to misery, you'd be hard pressed to explain why we should accept the cold hard scientific misery... — Hanover
There are not any grounds to believe I am a BiV and compelling evidence that I am not. I take your evasive reply as you conceding the point, Bob, that without public evidence one does not "know" one is not hallucinating (e.g. sensory deprivation).How do you know that you aren’t a brain in a vat? You don’t. — Bob Ross
Other than ideas (re: "idealism"), to what does this phrase refer?... mental properties ...
How do you know that you are not hallucinating "that you have thoughts"? or that those alleged "thoughts" are yours and not someone elses "thoughts"?One does not have to have public evidence of something to know it necessarily. — Bob Ross
I don't understand what you mean by "metaphysically necessary". At least as far as (e.g.) property dualism is concerned, the negation of "universal mind" – mental substance – is not a contradiction.The idea is the the universal mind is what is metaphysically necessary:
... and yet you claim to be monist positing "mental substance" wherein there are only ideas. :roll:A universal mind is not an idea ...
If America is the culmination of Western white civilization, as everyone from the Left to the Right declares, then there must be something terribly wrong with Western white civilization. This is a painful truth; few of us want to go that far.... The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al, don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history; it is the white race and it alone — its ideologies and inventions — which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself. — Susan Sontag, Paris Review 1967
