virtual afterlife ... simulation of resurrected bodies — Jack Cummins

It is questionable but it is a possiblity. — Jack Cummins

I generally see artificial intelligence as problematic as being without reflective self. — Jack Cummins

I believe absolute fundamentality can only really be found in the void itself... — punos

I understand [fascism] to the extent that I see it as right wing populism. I don't see how it can be anything else. — Arcane Sandwich

Populists are politicians who appeal directly to the people when they should be consulting the political process, and who are prepared to set aside procedures and legal niceties when the tide of public opinion flows in their favor. Like Donald Trump, populists can win elections. Like Marine Le Pen in France and Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, they can disrupt the long-standing consensus of government. Or, like Nigel Farage and the Brexiteers in Britain, they can use the popular vote to overthrow all the expectations and predictions of the political class. But they have one thing in common, which is their preparedness to allow a voice to passions that are neither acknowledged nor mentioned in the course of normal politics. And for this reason, they are not democrats but demagogues — not politicians who guide and govern by appeal to arguments, but agitators who stir the unthinking feelings of the crowd. — Roger Scruton, 2017

IMHO racism is best fought by emphasizing commonality and common goals rather than repeatedly emphasizing difference and/or prior victimhood within groups. The approach should be more future-oriented. — BitconnectCarlos

Kristi Noem confirmed as Sec'y of DHS. — FOTUS 47's Cabinet

What exactly is Process Philosophy? — Darkneos

Pete Hegseth confirmed as Sec'y of Defense — FOTUS 47's Cabinet

Do you think that's all an illusion? — RogueAI

Philosophy, as Wittgenstein points out, only describes how we use concepts (by which to interpretively frame 'experience') whereas unfalsified theories in science are used to explain – model the conditional causal relations of – transformations from one physical state-of-affairs to another. AFAIK, (fundamental) sciences are hypothetico-deductive (i.e. experimental) and not merely inductive (i.e. experiential) as per Popper vs Hume, et al. It's philosophy, in fact, that "explains nothing" about the world (i.e. existence & reality) but instead non-trivially interprets whatever we think we know about the world, etc. — 180 Proof

I don’t see how I’m committing a fallacy. — Bob Ross

Is mind a necessary condition for intelligence? — RogueAI

I don't think we can avoid a human-centered morality, even if we avoid putting what is good for humans at the center. It is human beings who judge questions of morality. — Fooloso4

The Tao does not replace god, it comes before it. God is just one of the 10,000 things - the multiplicity of phenomena in our world brought into being by the Tao. — T Clark

Does atheism entail that the category of 'the sacred' is meaningless? — Wayfarer

Does it entail that the 'mokṣa' of Hinduism or the 'Nirvāṇa' of Buddhism have no transcendent referent?

For an alternate atheistic take on Taoism , especially the thinking of Zhuangzi, I highly recommend the recently published book by Brook Ziporyn, one of the top translators of ancient Chinese texts. It is called ‘Experiments in Mystical Atheism: Godless Epiphanies from Daoism to Spinoza and Beyond‘. — Joshs

I don't think that white supremacists liking his salute means he himself is a nazi. — Christoffer

the definition of classical theism, which is considered rationally coherent — Tom Storm

God is good. — Astrophel

I imagine that AGI will not primarily benefit humans, and will eventually surpass us in every cognitive way. Any benefits to us, I also imagine (best case scenario), will be fortuitous by-products of AGI's hyper-productivity in all (formerly human) technical, scientific, economic and organizational endeavors.'Civilization' metacognitively automated by AGI so that options for further developing human culture (e.g. arts, recreation, win-win social relations) will be optimized – but will most of us / our descendants take advantage of such an optimal space for cultural expression or [will we] just continue amusing ourselves to death? — 180 Proof

[C]omposed beings that are concrete are either composed of an infinite regress of concrete things or there must be a first cause which is not concrete. — Bob Ross

I don't think it [AI, LLMs] does raise any questions about intelligence or consciousness at all. — Manuel

The choice can never be arbitrary, precisely because our attitudes, values and actions must always conditioned [...] — Joshs

... the OP is only targeting concretely existent objects. — Bob Ross

41. The composed beings must subsist through an absolutely simple and actual being.
42. Therefore, God exists. — Bob Ross