Religions actively shape world politics and nationalism and supports legislative change which impact on millions of people - everything from gay rights, the rights of women, capital punishment, euthanasia, contraception, abortion, what books which can be read, etc, etc. It's not just America and stacking the Supreme Court. Pernicious social policies and practices are rife in places like Modi's Hindu nationalist India and Saudi Arabia through the impact of Wahhabi Islam. — Tom Storm

In fact, I said nothing at all about QM being preposterous. — Ciceronianus

If that's what you believe, so be it. I merely think QM and religion are not analogous. — Ciceronianus

QM is a matter of knowledge, not (make)belief like religion. — 180 Proof

If you have anything specific in mind let me know, or not. — praxis

I'm perfectly willing to go into more depth but I can't tell exactly where you want to go. — praxis

I'll just add that I was motivated by the both of you to re-read the Yeats poem, and the hair stood up on my neck. Hasn't happened in awhile. — Noble Dust

I suspect that those studying QM approach things a bit differently than religious believers. — Ciceronianus

I'm not mean to believers; I'm critical of religious organizations.

Yes. — Vera Mont

Yeah, but QM is the kind of "preposterousness" that works whether or not anybody "believes in" it, unlike any religion. — 180 Proof

I don’t think much depth is needed to point out progress, at least where religion is concerned.

The separation of church and state for instance. Good progress, yes? — praxis

I think "useful" is the wrong way to think about it. People are brought together by communally held beliefs (communism, for instance) because they give life meaning, from which value is derived. This isn't unique to religion. — Noble Dust

But certainly, technology seems to be the most obvious form of real progress, and therefore the form that we question the least. I don't think this is a good thing. — Noble Dust

In this post I'm just looking at a small excerpt, not really to criticize the book itself but to dig out the meaning of the narrative of progress which we find at work, not only in Pinker's thinking, but more widely in the culture. — Jamal

Which only underscores the superfluousness of religion. — praxis

I think "useful" is the wrong way to think about it. People are brought together by communally held beliefs (communism, for instance) because they give life meaning, from which value is derived. This isn't unique to religion. — Noble Dust

I think that certain religious beliefs are less preposterous than others. But I doubt believers care whether they're more or less preposterous to others, and will be unimpressed by any argument that they're beliefs are unreasonable regardless of whether they're told there is no God or that particular beliefs about God are unsupportable. — Ciceronianus

Many people have a deep need to believe in God. They need the comfort of believing their deceased loved ones still exist, that death isn’t the end, and that one day they will join their loved ones in heaven, that there is a protector who they can turn to in times of need, etc. They will not easily give up such comforting beliefs. So, when an atheist criticizes their religion, the believer may feel they have two choices: 1) give up belief in God, religion, and all the comforts that go with it, 2) or reject, ignore, or explain away what the atheist says. — Art48

Eugen may get scolded by the mods. — Joshs

Those are not ''my terms". — Eugen

I'm not your philosophy teacher. You either learn those concepts and debate or ignore this OP. — Eugen

At what point does something become wholly unique to that animals set of traits? General processing with very few innate components seems to be a defining trait. One of kind, not just a few degrees away. — schopenhauer1

Enjoy. — Jamal

Yeah I love those Google tricks. There are other ones here:

20 Google Search Tips to Use Google More Efficiently — Jamal

The Google crawler likes TPF and has indexed most of our content. So you can search Google like this:

site:thephilosophyforum.com "the being of beings" — Jamal

Perhaps prohibition resulted in clearer heads. — praxis

I have become more culturally conservative (small "C") with age and yet less politically Conservative — 180 Proof

Growing old is inevitable but it's abundantly clear growing-up – outgrowing childish "fears" & "hopes" (i.e. superstitions & faiths)) is not. — 180 Proof

I find myself even more cognitively isolated from my peers (and family) than I'd felt in previous decades. — 180 Proof

Please bring your experiences into alignment with my inerrant suspicions. — BC

I suspect that people with a high level of personal confidence, self-efficacy, agency, and so on are less likely to seek social shelter in conservative groups. They are more likely to be comfortable with change and risk taking. Some people seem risk-averse early in life, and some are more likely to seek risk. — BC

If anything, the more I learn the more progressive I become... — praxis

I think people may be born with a kind of nature that predisposes them to one way or the other and no amount of learning has much impact on changing it. They say it has to do with openness to change or willingness to try new things. — praxis

The way I see philosophy it is a tool because philosophers have asked questions I never thought of asking and in that way it teaches us to ask questions and to see with a much broader perspective. — Athena

Stopping to think, instead of just reacting, is a learned habit, and those of us who actively nurtured the habit become better thinkers because of the accumulation of thoughts and experiences over a lifetime. — Athena

I have gotten more conservative. — Athena

I realize that what I've just written seems like nothing but two paragraphs of blah blah blah. — L'éléphant

Philosophy is good for checking our understanding of reality and expanding our consciousness but it is not the end all. It is a tool and none of the philosophies or religions are the final word of God. — Athena

I speak of the human that has all our faculties as we have them in modern humans. — schopenhauer1

But yes, I did that physically, sensually, and I loved the experience, but I found nothing. But I trust I missed it. — Noble Dust

I can of course dig around myself — Noble Dust

I can’t do shit — yet. But I’m working on a mutiny. — Mikie

On searching I found that most sources equate the meaning of 'being' with 'existence'. To be is to exist. So, whatever the historical common or philosophical usages might have been (and we are only talking about English usage here really, since translations from other languages are never precise), the logic of the synonymy between 'existence' and 'being' means that we can legitimately use the term 'a being' to refer to any existent. — Janus

I am not sure what you are saying. — schopenhauer1

language indeed does seem a difference in kind. — schopenhauer1

That is one theory. — schopenhauer1

The instinct for language, as humans use it, seem to be a difference in kind. — schopenhauer1

Can you define instinct? — schopenhauer1

Instinct is usually defined as the faculty of acting in such a way as to produce certain ends, without foresight of the ends, and without previous education in the performance. — William James - What is an Instinct

Darwin concluded that language ability is “an instinctive tendency to acquire an art,” a design that is not peculiar to humans but seen in other species such as song-learning birds. — Stephen Pinker - The Language Instinct

I am posing the question and thus, clearly I am asking thee. — schopenhauer1