Comments

  • We need a revolution in agriculture. Philosophy should support it.
    There are some amazingly robust and underutilized food producing organisms out there that could add energy efficient nutritional value to processed products.

    Moringa oleifera (called the Miracle Tree) grows in semi-arid locations of sub-tropics/tropics. Leaves from this tree provide a mineral rich complete protein to supplement a calorie source. Seeds also provide cooking oil.

    Gram for gram comparison of Moringa leaf to other sources of nutrition:

    2x the protein of yogurt
    4x vitamin A of carrots
    3x the potassium of bananas
    4x the calcium of milk
    7x vitamin C of oranges ( info from kulikulifoods.com)

    I'm also ready to eat insects.
  • I Died For Beauty
    Horses by Pablo Neruda

    From the window I saw the horses.

    I was in Berlin, in winter. The light
    had no light, the sky had no heaven.

    The air was white like wet bread.

    And from my window a vacant arena,
    bitten by the teeth of winter.

    Suddenly driven out by a man,
    ten horses surged through the mist.

    Like waves of fire, they flared forward
    and to my eyes filled the whole world,
    empty till then. Perfect, ablaze,
    they were like ten gods with pure white hoofs,
    with manes like a dream of salt.

    Their rumps were worlds and oranges.

    Their color was honey, amber, fire.

    Their necks were towers
    cut from the stone of pride,
    and behind their transparent eyes
    energy raged, like a prisoner.

    There, in silence, at mid-day,
    in that dirty, disordered winter,
    those intense horses were the blood
    the rhythm, the inciting treasure of life.

    I looked. I looked and was reborn:
    for there, unknowing, was the fountain,
    the dance of gold, heaven
    and the fire that lives in beauty.

    I have forgotten that dark Berlin winter.

    I will not forget the light of the horses.
  • I Died For Beauty
    Emily Dickinson's I Died for Beauty

    I died for beauty, but was scarce
    Adjusted in the tomb,
    When one who died for truth was lain
    In an adjoining room.

    He questioned softly why I failed?
    "For beauty," I replied.
    "And I for truth - the two are one;
    We brethren are," he said.

    And so, as kinsmen met a-night,
    We talked between the rooms,
    Until the moss had reached our lips,
    And covered up our names.
  • Witness me!
    Hope you had a giggle.Wallows

    I'm somewhat serious about the scenario. It's not funny at all.

    I too am Wallows (any Wallows), and I will raise him by raising myself.
  • Witness me!
    Hypothetical Scenario:

    A newborn baby miraculously appears in Wallows room, with a notarized birth certificate legally confirming that Wallows is the biological father of a miracle ( a child from nowhere). Wallows also knows somehow by intuition that he is this child (this will be a reincarnation of Wallows).

    Given the Wallows of habit, given that Wallows likely knows himself by some measure, does Wallows raise the child as his own or does he file for adoption? What is the compassionate thing to do?
  • Abuse of moderaton-privilege--removal of a thread from a category
    No one denies that survivable fertile offspring from inter-order hybridization is, if possible at all, very, very improbable and rare.

    So, sorry there aren't more instances of evidence.
    Michael Ossipoff

    Therefore the theory being right is highly improbable.
  • Abuse of moderaton-privilege--removal of a thread from a category
    Try a less controversial thread in a science forum.

    What is the evidence of inter-ordinal hybridization in nature. Pose question to relevant forum. Do not mention pig chimp sexual relations. Do not mention McCarthy.
  • What actually unites mankind?
    Not sure how to understand what is being asked.

    Discord, dissension, strife, conflict might just as well be causes of temporary unity. To identify and sacrifice for an identity by sharing attributes, hardships, memories, experiences, culture, desires, beliefs et cetera, is as much cause of unity as disunity. A union requires existential conditions for its unity, whether emerging from natural states (self-organizing structures) or careful human deliberation.

    Eating and drinking is a universal necessity among a lot of species. So maybe the recognition of this fact of survival has the potential to unify. But the belief as to what one ought to eat may separate us as much as it unifies.

    That which by belief requires a conservation of its union must work to protect that union.

    Life unifies by dissembling itself. Life eats life.
  • Top Hybridization-Geneticist suggests we're a Pig-Chimp Hybrid.
    Pigs have gestational periods of 114 days.
    Chimps have gestational periods of 243 days.

    So how long was the gestational period of the pig that was impregnated by a chimpanzee?

    Here is just one developmental incongruity (among many others) that has to be overcome to support chimpig origins.

    It seems that whether the sperm and egg of two vastly unrelated mammalian species can fuse at all is an interesting question and an experiment that is likely to have been done in a petri dish.
  • Obligation of existing: philosophy through bad poetry
    The Ape Shit Linguist
    Languishes on.

    Behold the wearying locutions of your letters, sand grains texturing wordy landscapes.

    Read the desert stretch of your sentences as miles of my ersatz grief.

    For crap sake, shut up!

    The buffoonery of your babble
    Of bullshit, in blasting heat or brittling cold, does not console me.

    Mirages of a quiet hope gleam on the horizon.

    The sea is the same, fathoms full of salty tears.

    Butt also... (not "but also")

    Lucky comforted on our motoring mounts, ships and caravans, skin upholstered arm chairs.

    Ride on Lucky,
    Ride on...

    For the ass is sore and Sophia is snoring...

    Awake Sophia!

    Awake fragile pigeon of my heart. I seek thy company, to distract me from my mind troubles and the void of the desert.
  • Obligation of existing: philosophy through bad poetry
    You're supposed to post poetry in the Lounge.
  • What is a meme?
    but some people think that memes spread because they are useful to the person or people that it exists in....this doesn't necessarily follow.wax

    There is a trade-off continuum in any ecology whereby there are interacting agents (memes, genes, agents) that are classifiable as (a) symbionts (b) commensals (c) parasites relative to one another.

    This is just borrowing from the way some evolutionary biologists talk about relationships between organisms in an ecology. There is the possibility that ideas are parasitical in the way of being great replicators, always relative to an ecology or landscape which is an mosaic of replicating patterns (Darwinian agents), all interacting with one another. Dennett gives the example of a religious faith (ideas) perpetuating a cycle of suicide bombing as a parasitical meme. It maybe serving an institution which is helped to replicate by it, which is yet another construct made of agents.

    It's definitely a weird way of looking at things and I'm not sure its very useful. How far can the analogy be carried and what work can it do (if any work at all)?

    It's agents (replicators) all the way down in an infinite regress, even as you come to natural, stable, recurring patterns that constitute the substrate in which any Darwinian process can or is likely to occur. This is pushing the speculative possibility of Universal Darwinism (natural selection processes in non-biological domains).
  • What is a meme?
    Whose "memes" are priming our notion of the "meme meme"? Universal Darwinism is scary (but this is just a meme).

    A passage from Dennett's 1995 book, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, on The Philosophical Importance of Memes:

    Our normal view of ideas is also a normative view: it embodies a cannon or an ideal about which ideas we ought to accept or admire or approve of. In brief, we ought to accept the true and the beautiful. According to the normal view, the following are virtual tautologies -- trivial truths not worth the ink to write them down:

    Idea X was believed by the people because X was deemed to true.

    People approved of X because people found X to be beautiful.

    These norms are not just dead obvious, they are constitutive: they set the rules whereby we think about ideas. We require explanations only when there are deviations from these norms. Nobody has to explain why a book purports to be full of true sentences, or why an artist might strive to make something beautiful -- it just "stands to reason." The constitutive status of these norms grounds the air of paradox in such aberrations as "The Metropolitan Museum of Banalities" or "The Encyclopedia of Falsehoods." What requires a special explanation in the normal view are the cases in which despite the truth of beauty of an idea it is not accepted, or despite its ugliness or falsehood it is:

    The meme's-eye view purports to be an alternative to this normal perspective. What is tautological for it is:

    Meme X spread among the people because X is a good replicator.
    — Dennett, pg. 363
  • The Sunflower And The Butterfly
    Zhuangzi was day dreaming again. On reflection of a reading someone's dream, he wondered if he could be other than just Zhuangzi, whether he could've been:

    The Farmer
    The Farmer's Son
    The Farmer's Wife
    The Farmer's Daughter
    A Self-aware Sunflower
    A Talking Butterfly

    He then surmised that his vision of being in the story best related to the free perspective of a butterfly. He had been above the rows of corn and saw the neighboring sunflower fields. He had evaded by chance the flying pebbles thrown by the farmer's son. He saw the farmer's wife hanging laundry out to dry. He sat on a giant golden disk which he hallucinated to appear ultraviolet and sipped sweetness from its neon florets. At any moment he could rise above, to leave the scene by his will toward some other sweetness.

    Zhuangzi feel asleep again after too much yellow wine and found himself to be senseless, enrobed lightly in something like carpet or a sheet, shutting out light and sound. All apertures of sense where covered and he could only guess as to what he was and where he was and why. He counted his breaths to pass the time and wondered how he had learn to count, or whether he was really breathing. He tried to exercise that former will that allowed him to rise above the golden fields but there was no point in taking flight in total darkness. The only way out would be again to wait, to sleep to wake, to dream about the floating vertigo of being other than Zhuangzi.
  • Is everything inconsequential?
    As such, how can we say that life is any different than death?simmerdown

    This is interesting insofar there is only the state of being (self-aware experience). After I am dead the only prospect there is is being again in time. There is no necessary link between beings after death or before birth.

    One could say there is no sure finality to being, if all there is the experience (in any way) of being in time.

    Death is a consolation to the possible eternity of discontinuous beings in time.

    Or this is possibly decorative word smithing.

    So if being eternal is scary because you are having an unpleasant time, don't worry, you're going to die, then there could be something like a mammalian bat for a short time (if there is anything it is like to be a bat). It's a lottery behind a veil of injustice, where you get ejected into being that is a burden for itself... improbably. (An attempt at humor...)
  • What's grinding your gears?
    The Unease of Unreality with Loneliness and Depression

    Relativistic nihilism is a giant iron planet that causes a relativity well, sucking down the stupid mosaic of self and dispersing it like a jig saw puzzle. The sides are so steep that you have to develop a mechanism (McGyver it) for getting out by coordinating parts of the stupid self mosaic. One foot on side G, hand on ledge Q, coordinate on axis N. Where have my balls gone? Did I ever have balls? Are they the causal agents of courage?

    It's as easy as getting in front of others, trying something new. It's as easy not believing what you believe (as a practice). It's as easy as forcing yourself to get out of bed when you might as well be dead. It's as easy as getting hemodialysis if your kidneys are failing (mine are not). It's as easy speaking a comforting narrative. It's as easy as doing an hour of more of Yoga everyday for the rest of your life. It's as easy exposure therapy to what you fear.

    There are people to love in exchange for what is worth loving, somewhere, by visions of memory. There are strangers to befriend beyond fear, if a mind can imagine it. There are friends to be bought in desperation (and whores to be adored by strange love).
  • Get Creative!
    The Poet's Wish

    Always sew irony into the ends of a procreative wish.

    The poet spoke (trembling with desire for an epidemic resurrection of a classic order) into the netted abyss. Another sent a probe.

    What came back first was a trickle, then a flow, then a torrential mixture of brutalizing elements: the globe itself came in force, shattering to the poet's call.

    Waves of liquefied clay poured through the valleys carrying forth the macerated bodies of post-postmodern poets and other mediocre indiscernibles, plastic bags, foam, tires, bottles, broken bits of lumber, swirling in untidy currents around the poet's life boat.

    Vast collections of unread poetry, soaked, churned and remade, rendered back to him his wishes in a mass slurry of a newly naturalized and fluid gibberish.

    And there were no walls to stop the floods of babble.

    There were boats to float above the floods of babble.


    _________________

    Rub-a-dub-dub,
    Three bodies in a tub,
    And who do you think they be?
    Anyone and everyone
    And all of them out to sea.
  • Endings
    Assume it has happened before and it will happen again.

    If there is nothing it is like to be dead or asleep, there is bound to be a another self-aware substitute inquirer with an inquiry, even if what is doing the inquiring is a non-biological replicator or an arachnid prince, pauper or a sleepwalker.

    Why should this state of being be statistically impossible? This is likely the only kind of state that is possible, which is to say that all states of being are reductively equivalent in terms of "being" at all.
  • On 'Acting'
    I just don't get the "schizophrenic" obsession with people who can put on different personalities and entertain people.Wallows

    Doesn't society require us to "act" all the time. I have to maintain a certain limited persona in front of my boss or else risk the likelihood of being fired. Here we have to play at being a philosopher, if we are not sufficiently educated as to know what a "proper response" entails and what kinds of questions are permitted or not. If I start dressing as a clown for work interactions, maybe no one will care... but I'm not going to do that empirical test, even though I day dream about it now and then.

    Every domain presents a range of options for persona alteration.

    Think about the way you might talk to your mother is entirely different from the way you might talk to your friend or anyone else for that matter. This could be viewed as compartmentalization of personas, that you want your "character" to be perceived properly with regard to others by intent.

    "All the world’s a stage,
    And all the men and women merely players..."

    Beginning to some part of As you Like It by William Shakespeare.
  • The God of Creation vs the God of Rituals
    For those too lazy to wiki:

    A ritual is a sequence of activities involving gestures, words, and objects, performed in a sequestered place, and performed according to set sequence.[1] Rituals may be prescribed by the traditions of a community, including a religious community. Rituals are characterized but not defined by formalism, traditionalism, invariance, rule-governance, sacral symbolism, and performance.

    A ritual is a sequence of activities involving gestures, words, and objects, performed in a sequestered place, and performed according to set sequence.[1] Rituals may be prescribed by the traditions of a community, including a religious community. Rituals are characterized but not defined by formalism, traditionalism, invariance, rule-governance, sacral symbolism, and performance.[2]

    Rituals are a feature of all known human societies.[3] They include not only the worship rites and sacraments of organized religions and cults, but also rites of passage, atonement and purification rites, oaths of allegiance, dedication ceremonies, coming of age ceremony or rites, coronations and presidential inaugurations, marriages and funerals, school "rush" traditions and graduations, club meetings, sporting events, Halloween parties, veterans parades, Christmas shopping and more. Many activities that are ostensibly performed for concrete purposes, such as jury trials, execution of criminals, and scientific symposia,[citation needed] are loaded with purely symbolic actions prescribed by regulations or tradition, and thus partly ritualistic in nature. Even common actions like hand-shaking and saying "hello" may be termed rituals.

    The field of ritual studies has seen a number of conflicting definitions of the term. One given by Kyriakidis is that a ritual is an outsider's or "etic" category for a set activity (or set of actions) that, to the outsider, seems irrational, non-contiguous, or illogical. The term can be used also by the insider or "emic" performer as an acknowledgement that this activity can be seen as such by the uninitiated onlooker.[4]

    In psychology, the term ritual is sometimes used in a technical sense for a repetitive behavior systematically used by a person to neutralize or prevent anxiety; it is a symptom of obsessive–compulsive disorder.
    — Wikipedia: Ritual

    I don't follow any rituals nor do I encourage them because I actually don't know if God exists or not.TheMadFool

    Would you reconsider the belief that you "don't follow any rituals" given that what is or is not a ritual is possibly a culturally relative distinction.
  • The Doctor
    "There is a rock, but no one is there to perceive it, because we all died an hour previously.

    Is there a rock? Yes or no?"

    What disease causes someone to ask such questions? Or is this a sign of health?
  • The God of Creation vs the God of Rituals
    Mircea Eliade (scholar of myth) relates some ritual performance of our forebears as a means to sustain creation itself. There is more to this point of view than what the conventional secular dismissal permits.

    What does commuting every morning from the suburbs to the city, in fuming congestion sustain? And why is it not a ritual? Because riding in a car is miscategorized as a non-ritual, non-religious, secular perodicity. You are not riding to church... and the world as a whole is not a sacred place. Your lover is a bag of blood, bones and shit, and if his/her face accidentally unbecomes itself, then something else may change.

    "There are only two ways to live your life: as though nothing is a miracle, or as though everything is a miracle." Albert Eeinstein (did Eeinstein say this?)

    The ritual of the anti-miracle is one of disenchantment. For example, the ritual of demonstrating "free will" is on going somewhere close by.
  • The God of Creation vs the God of Rituals
    See pantheism or panentheism.

    There is also something like the soul of the universe, common to all beings, called Atman (check this out) in Vedanta myth.

    Currently the notion of a fractal universe (or holographic) impresses me as a possibility, where smaller fractions contain the same information (or pattern) as the whole.
  • The Very Hungry Caterpillar

    Others, inversely, believed that it was fundamental to eliminate useless works. They invaded the hexagons (rooms of books), showed credentials that were not always false, leafed through a volume with displeasure and condemned whole shelves: their hygienic, ascetic furor caused the senseless perdition of millions of books. Their name is execrated, but those who deplore the "treasures" destroyed by this frenzy neglect two notable facts. One: the Library is so enormous that any reduction of human origin is infinitesimal. The other: every copy is unique, irreplaceable, but (since the Library is total) there are always several hundred thousand imperfect facsimiles: works which differ only in a letter or comma.
    — J.L. Borges, The Library of Babel

  • It is life itself that we can all unite against
    And then there will be no more humans whinging about the misery of existence.Bitter Crank

    Are you an antiwhingilist?
  • It is life itself that we can all unite against
    Suppose that the best way to hasten the extinction our species is actually to increase reproduction rates of our species and therefore to generate excitement for pronatal narratives.

    There could be some calculus by which increased suffering of a mass of lives in the short term warrants a quickening of the end of life in the long term.

    Antinatalists unite! We must pass out pronatal propaganda!
  • Buddhism to Change the World
    In the same way people from India then to be less materialistic and more conformististic because they believe in the law of Karma.pbxman

    That is to say people from Buddhist countries tend to be more submissive and prone to change the inside than the outside.pbxman

    I don't agree. This seems like an unsubstantiated claim.Tzeentch

    Karma is quite an insidious, slippery and engimatic concept because it can be interpreted in contradictory ways. Any material success might be interpreted as a status indicator of good Karma by some Indians today. The notion of Karma might have been used to sustain the caste system but whether this is good or bad is relative to point of view.

    In some sense you can't be held responsible for your Karma if Karma is responsible for your inability to carry out right action. A systematic interpretation of Karma might be an insidious deception of Karma. Ugh...

    Is there a better interpretation of Karma?
  • Total Recall - Voluntary Ignorance Paradox
    you'd never know with certainty, but that's a truism about empirical claims period.Terrapin Station

    Are there non-empirical claims we can know for certain by way of proofs that do not rely on empirical claims? Sorry if this does not make sense.

    Are all claims either directly or indirectly dependent on empirical observations? And is this also a truism?
  • There is No Actual Profit Gained by Business Activity
    Are you positing a dramatic increase in testicle size and/or sperm production to account for this population growth? — Bloginton Blakely

    No, just the fact of sexual reproduction alone is enough to account for population growth. If we just got rid of men there might be less problems you ascribe to business. (This is silly)

    Business is the action of creating and trading property usually for the purpose of generating an alleged surplus.Bloginton Blakley

    It could be about trading property to maintain life. An alleged surplus might be relative to what one needs or wants.
  • There is No Actual Profit Gained by Business Activity
    The needs of business created the large human population we have.Bloginton Blakley

    It could have just as well been the needs of men that created our large human population. Maybe testicles are actually responsible for the human population.

    What is business anyway? And what isn't business? Please tell us in so many words.
  • The Very Hungry Caterpillar
    I don't eat or sleep properly - I haven't eaten all day until just now, for instance - I have terrible memory, and I often act like a sociopath or someone with Asperger's. There are some basic day-to-day stuff that I've just stopped doing, which leads to problems. I'm not communicating with people in my life as I'm expected to. I'm barely coping. All of this is causing big problems for me. I'm not entirely sure what's wrong with me. It's obviously something, even if it doesn't have a name like you get with a mental disorder. Some of this sociopath stuff fits. I got my job through superficial charm, and I use it on customers, but the people I work with have clocked on that I'm a robot, and they expect me to be like them all of the time and not stand there being unsociable, which is difficult and draining. My job requires me to be an actor on different levels almost at all times.

    But there's always a bright side, I suppose. This pizza I'm eating right now tastes good.
    — S
  • The Very Hungry Caterpillar
    Jesus, S. Are you inflamed this morning.
  • Sign conversation example (argued to be greater than word)
    This could just as well be about the pleasure of charades in some non-conventional format.

    S + rattle =

    :naughty: :strong: :down:

    :nerd: :fire: :heart:

    Axe + Tree =
  • Another Universal Language and its Usage
    And, as mentioned in the synopsis, I made my little attempt at such categorisation and am curious to know if the result of my attempt, the list, could make sense to other people since it perfectly makes sense to me.Eseitch

    Could you explain a bit more about your categorization (typology) in your link. What are the details of the method (algorithm) by which you assign a name under (i)Angel (ii)Demon (iii)Great in a grouping of 3. Are the grouped names refuting major points? Are they voices in a dialogue? Does the Great tag represent a synthesis or mediation of content associated with the preceding 2 names?
  • The Reptilian Conspiracy Theory vs Buddhism
    Mythic narrative is always an interpretation which can be re-translated into acceptable or unacceptable (contemporary, historical, fantastical) terms.

    "Soma Sema" was said to be a gnostic meme.

    It translates to the "The body is a prison" (maybe "body prison", or "body tomb"). Double check, I'm terrified of being wrong.

    This is a seed (existential attitude) for story which could portray a perfectly reasonable and contemporary setting.

    Sisyphus roles a rock up a hill, only to have it fall down again. Who is making Sisyphus role the rock of the hill? Possibly aliens (those who manipulated those who ordered those who hold S. to the grind). Or maybe the rock that is rolling is the burden of maintaining the body itself... that being, becoming is some kind of absurd work.

    It is important to look for many ways in which a myth (metaphor) reveals truth, even though it could have been stated in more serious terms: "The rat race is not a race for rats." Get your facts straight.
  • The Oxytocin puzzle
    What about if we can't make a clean cut between good and bad, presuming that they're both caused by a single biochemical?TheMadFool

    We've all heard that correlation is not causation.

    A kind of emotional preference or attachment is somehow correlated with oxytocin levels. As to the specific nature of that preference, a tremendous range of other complicating factors are in play.

    Strong attachment might naturally necessitate a strong discrimination towards what threatens to obstruct or dissolve that attachment. We protect what we love but whether it is moral to protect what we love is a question? Are we free to love whom we love?

    Case in point, how might oxytocin play a role in a preference for treating pet animals well (by law) while ignoring other kinds of animal abuse (industrial meat and egg production). Dogs might make pretty good dog burgers... Except, we love Lassie. Lassie is part of the family... Who are you eating, Lassie?

    Might be interesting to look up cases of oxytocin deficiency. Oxytocin plays a role in empathy and facial recognition (Oh, Sarah, you look so happy this morning, Oh poochy pooch, your doggie smile fills me with sweetness).
  • The Oxytocin puzzle


    Doesn't quite touch the study cited in the OP but still interesting.

    The two-fold behavioral effect of oxytocin might make sense with regard to caring for young from the stand point of being a mother. A mother is attached to young and therefore becomes more discerning or preferential. It might benefit her to distrust out-group members to protect her young.

    "Hate" is probably too strong a word to assign to these effects of oxytocin on human preference between in-group versus out-group members.

    Edit: Actually this is interesting as regards 'attachment as a cause of unnecessary suffering' philosophic frame.
  • The unavoidable dangers of belief and believers responsibility of the dangers
    Religion as passively accepted faith (inherited lifestyle) is not something one might necessarily choose. It happens to you as a consequence of cultural pressure or personal revelation.

    If you are born in some Mormon family, love or respect could be conditional upon accepting certain ways of doing things. You don't really need believe at all. You just need to act as if you believe, follow rules, otherwise you get exiled (let go).

    Some Muslim households will even kill their children if they have transgressed an interpretation of religious law.

    Religious belief is an empty justification for doing as you do, sometimes at great social cost.

    It is only because of different competing values, by which society is ordered, that religious beliefs are registered as dangerous, or harmful.

    It might be universally desirable to do no harm if we have the choice but a sense of "having the choice" might itself be a belief that is gifted to us and that we think we ought to gift to others.

    The gift of free thought surely permits us to advocate for the devil in the same way God would advocate for his believers, by appeal to choice or fate.
  • Cream
    Is our sense of meaning and value in a meaningless world/universe as much of an illusion as something induced by this "cream? Like if you have a pill that would give you a sense of meaning in your life, how is that different from if you invent a meaning to your life when there isn't any external meaning at all? Where is the illusion of meaning and where is the actual meaning?Christoffer

    I just re-watched Tarkovsky's "masterpiece", Stalker. It provides nearly the same premise, as the wish-fulfilling Zone corresponds well to David Firth's Cream but is beautifully rendered (though long and meditative) as moving toward a point in space. A more recent film is also a Annihilation, which could be a curious derivative of Stalker (moving toward a point of different kind of annihilation, or revaluation of life). You might like to check them out to help extract more inspiration for working toward the philosophy of the subject.

    What appears at first inquiry (curiosity or replusion) becomes on closer inspection a self-transforming or self-identifying paradox (like cream), as if we do not really understand the consequences of our own deep desiring nature (the desire to know the truth, to be or achieve XYZ, the effects of cream on interpreting our desire).

    There is a scary aspect to the affirmation or belief that there is no non-human meaning, no transcendent God that is not a projection of our own being in its blind, primordial desire. Cold relativity and the unboundedness of being becomes quite stark. This is possibly what those who associate with nihilism and existentialism dream about, the absence of anything beyond the folly of our species (as ourselves), and associated feeling of despair ("this is it, the grind, sleeping and eating, it is what it is, et cetera). The more we realize the mutability and temporality of our experience the more we might realize how empty (or full) our own current state is.