That is, what does a non-deterministic world with free will look like/how would it behave? — Jerry
The question concerns instantiations of freedom, no amount of formal systematising could give us evidence for these instants if they have not been experienced (this is both intuitive and provable), and to speak clearly about the topic of freedom we must expose these instants and define our concept of freedom by a duality.
We also have to be clear about what kind of thing it is which may or may not be free, and what kind of thing it is which is not free, luckily for us we could not even investigate these issues if these answers weren't already included in our questions, we summon the self as we so ask and we have no self to summon in the absence of the things that the self is not.
The things conjoined with the self is not infinite so therefore is the self not free without restrictions (it weren't even a self without restrictions).
We can further establish that concepts (abstractions) are also a necessary ground for freedom (though it is still unsolved whether it in addition to self and the non-self (say blue) is sufficient for freedom), we also know that the self is nothing without its concepts.
We know that freedom is impossible without concept, but we also know that freedom is one of the things which also becomes a concept for the self and we know that it is not concepts which were questioned to be free or not free and we must therefore accept that the concept of freedom is itself entirely unfree even if the self were determinably free in its will.
Let us investigate how concepts relates to the things they apply to, surely we can agree that the concept of elephant is far simpler than the experience of an elephant? And that the concept in proportion to its simplicity applies to many different individual creatures in Africa? Could this proportionality be the answer to our question of the freedom of the self? I believe so.
I believe freedom to act either towards A or B exists precisely because the proportionality between simplicity and reality allows for many simple things at once and that the will is the feeling towards either of the simple concepts.
I do not think that the will is freed from the feeling of either of the concepts, but i think the self is freed from the future it does not choose by not being reducible to the will. I do not think the will is free to choose which concept to "feel" for but I do think the self, in being always more than the natural will/volition is free to act within the limits of the simultaneity of its concepts.
You are not free to will anything, but your consciousness is more than the will itself and is therewith freed from it. The will is determined by the state of the universe, but consciousness through the "space" left it by the simple nature of its concepts is perpetually freed from the will, some humans excessively so.
This were not very well written, I hope to come back to the topic later and respond more directly to the OPs concerns by judging it under the principles I established, I also hope that it can be accepted by the moderators that I first delve into the concepts and then only later perform the deductive tasks of judging the post by means of them though as most threads here suggest common practice is to reverse that order.