I am, therefore I think So this would be a way to address the relationship between logic and the world: we actually don't use logic for most of the actions we take...
Driving a car or riding a bike are obvious examples of mindless action. — frank
Hi. Great examples. The following may not at all be new to you, but in that case we can at least enjoy sharing awareness/agreement.
What do we know when we know how to ride a bike with no hands, for example? It is not propositional or linguistic knowledge. It is 'knowhow.'
And how does the bike exist for this knowhow? I don't think we can capture that propositionally either. Sometimes the bike is 'transparent.' I forget about it and look at the fox I saw tonight on my ride. Sometimes there's an obstacle to look out for, and I am conscious of the bike as I carefully turn it without using my hands. But the no-longer-transparent bike is not tranformed into a theoretical object but rather into a tool consciously employed.
Is the same true for personality? Is the 'true' philosophy a knowhow as opposed to a knowthat? Of course we need plenty of knowthats in life, but perhaps you see what I'm getting at. The philosophers for whom practice was primary and the supporting theory of that practice secondary come to mind.