The Philosophy Forum

  • Forum
  • Members
  • HELP

  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    I'm just sayin' I'll do that if you're right about the national polls; what'll you do if I'm right that you're completely wrong? — Baden
    I'll live in the US struggling against a neofascist regime while you and the rest of the world will be wagging your fingers and saying "I told you so." :mask:

    In 2020 Biden-Harris won the national / popular vote by 51.3% (or margin of +4.5%) against an incumbent POTUS who actively compromised the election system. 306 electors vs 232 electors (by flipping two Republican states and winning the very same three states lost by a combined 0.7% due to HRC's arrogant neglect in 2016)! My ELECTORAL COLLEGE prediction (and reasoning for it) does not deviate significantly from the 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022 trend. If I was merely "wishful thinking", mate, I wouldn't rely on center-right to right wing news media polling (and the best stats for T therein).

    But hey you go right on bloviating from the cheap seats, my friend; I'm looking forward to that photo (the more lurid the better). :smirk:
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    ↪Baden
    I don't understand your post ... but I'm now looking forward to you posting that pic. :sweat:
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    12Oct24

    Sorry 180 Proof. I’ll put money on it. — Mikie
    :ok: You stick with those MAGA-GOP talking points and I'll stick with my 22Sept24 prediction¹ that Harris-Walz will win the upcoming Roevember 5th presidential election. :victory: :party:

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/934008 [1]

    Harris will beat Trump, says election prediction legend Allan Lichtman² :victory: :cool: — 180 Proof
    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/05/harris-trump-lichtman-election-prediction.html [2]

    (2022)
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/781991

    (2023)
    Also, when you say it won’t be Joe Biden as the nominee — care to bet on that too?
    — Mikie
    Like taking candy from a baby. :yum:
    — 180 Proof
    I (technically) have won this bet but lost the other one that Diaper Don wouldn't be the GOP nominee. The latter, however, no doubt contributed to the former. :up:

    ===========

    NB: Fwiw, since Labor Day I think it's reasonable to have read "mainstream" news media polls as follows –

    Given that Diaper Don The Fascist Clown & his MAGA-GOP Circus Cult have pissed-off the majority of (likely) women voters so much since 2018 (then doubled down on the blatant misogyny in 2022 and again this year), I guesstimate (not counting Dems campaigns' huge money & get-out-the-vote ground game advantages) woman voters' preference for Harris-Walz & Dems is undercounted by 2% and The Clown is thereby generally overcounted by 5% in "national polls" and overcounted by 2% in swing state polls, and so I read them accordingly [adjusted]; for example:

    swing states [T -2%]

    Forbes 11Oct24 (latest, best #s for T)

    AZ - T 51% [49] v H 46%
    GA - T 49% [47] v H 48%
    MI - T 45% [43] v H 47%
    NC - T 46% [44] v H 45%
    NV - T 47% [46] v H 48%
    PA - T 46% [44] v H 45%

    WI - T 48% [46] v H 46%

    Electors - T216 + 21 (max) v H229 + 72 (min) :cool:

    &

    national [T -5%, H +2%]

    FiveThirtyEight 12Oct24 national polls (avg.)

    T 46% [41] v H 48.5% [50.5]

    NYTimes 12Oct24 national polls (avg.)

    T 46% [41] v H 49% [51]

    The Economist 12Oct24 national polls (avg.)

    T 46.4% [41.4] v H 50.2% [52.2]

    Fox Noise 12Oct24 national polls (?)

    T 48% [43] v H 50% [52]

    ===========

    To date all (quality) polling trends favor Harris-Walz +270 Electoral College victory. Hyping election anxiety is great for motivating Democratic, Independent & GOP/suburban white women voter turnout / particpation. :strong: :mask:

    >>> Roevember 24
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    [Y]our arguments apply (at best) only to your concepts [ ... ] The discussion seems to be about an uncaused first cause, and that's an unbreakable oxymoron. As such you can only have it if you first grant it. But then you [@Hallucinogen] have proved exactly nothing. All this worked out millennia ago. If you're just working it out for yourself, some credit to you. But the argument has long been a dead letter. — tim wood
    :up: :up:
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    ↪SophistiCat
    :up: :up:

    Atheism is the rejection of theism. — DingoJones
    :Period. :100:

    @Hallucingen's OP is nonsense.
  • A Functional Deism
    However, if that is ↪180 Proof's definition of Deism ... — Gnomon
    Another trollish non sequitur ...

    (2022 – Gnomon is)
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/783863

    (2022 – as Gnomon does)
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/781656

    @tim wood
  • How can we humans avoid being just objects?
    ↪Angelo Cannata
    ???
  • Why Einstein understood time incorrectly
    ↪Banno
    :smirk:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    ↪Mikie
    :up:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    And is there a certain type of pro-Israel Jew that you do respect? — BitconnectCarlos
    Speaking for myself, I respect every pro-Isreal Jew who openly, vigourously denounces and opposes the mass murdering, ethnic cleansing, apartheid policies of the US/Nato-backed Netanyahu regime.
  • A Functional Deism
    [T]he plain bald fact of the matter is that if you [@Gnomon] do not know what it means, then your education is lacking. And not only just because you don't know what it means, but also because you don't seem to recognize that it's meaningful, or that you can easily look it up. It also means you're unfamiliar with books that commonly have comments in them in Latin, Greek, German and so forth. So while it does not say, "You're an idiot," you yourself have instead said, "I'm an idiot," and apparently proud to be. — tim wood
    :clap: :sweat:
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    ↪T Clark
    :cool:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    The only real solution here is equal rights for Palestinians, and for Israel to become a normal, modern state where multiple ethnicities can coexist. — Tzeentch
    :100: :up:

    Instead of learning from his interlocuters here, who aren't exactly dumb, he [@BitconnectCarlos] chooses to drink right wing Israeli cool aid. — Benkei
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    ↪tim wood
    :up:

    I could point out that eternal mathematical relationships (e.g., Pythagoras' theorem) don't change as everything else changes ... — Hallucinogen
    So what? "Mathematical relationships" are mere abstractions (i.e. tautologies – truth, not "being") and not events, forces, facts or things.
  • Philosophy Proper
    ↪Leontiskos
    :up:
  • Am I my body?
    I don't have a body. — Kurt Keefner
    Yes, rather you are a body (i.e. metacognitivrly self-aware, decaying flesh & bone; once an unviable foetus and not yet a rotting corpse) at the very least.

    ... 'person' is derived from 'persona' which were the masks worn by actors in Greek drama. It corresponds to 'ego', which is, we can say, the self's idea of itself, and refers to what we are consciously aware of as ourselves, who we ourselves think that we are. — Wayfarer
    :clap: :fire:

    I think "mind" is what the brain and body does ... — BC
    :100:
  • Philosophy Proper
    Analytic philosophy is a toolkit and not a school of philosophy? — Leontiskos
    It's both, and nothing I've writtrn here is inconsistant with that.
  • Philosophy Proper
    ↪AmadeusD
    :up: :up:

    ↪Shawn
    As a meta/discursive practice, imo, philosophy is a 'toolkit' consisting of (e.g.) rhetorical, logical, conceptual & methodological 'tools' (techniques) and schools (paradigms / fashions ... (e.g.) analytic, dialectical-critical, hermeneutical, synthetic)) of 'tool-usage', etc.
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    ↪Hallucinogen

    Also a "necessary being" is a contradiction in terms insofar as for it to be "necessary" means that "being" is unchangeable (i.e. both being and not-being simultaneously). — 180 Proof
    Whatever else is meant by (ontologically) "necessary", this modality also implies unchangeable. The only way X is unchangeable in relation to every other changing Z (i.e. non-necessary Z) is that X itself is simultaneously X & not-X, or always in a state of all of its possible relations/modes; thus, self-contradictory.
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    The point is that denial of a necessary entity entails a contradiction. — Hallucinogen
    – IFF "a necessary entity" is not itself a contradiction in terms, which it is as I've pointed out.

    ↪DingoJones
    ???
  • Atheism about a necessary being entails a contradiction
    ↪Hallucinogen
    Afaik:

    There is no first (or last) number on the real number line.

    There is no first (or last) point on the circumference of a circle.

    There are no edges to the surface of a sphere or an infinite plane.

    Also a "necessary being" is a contradiction in terms insofar as for it to be "necessary" means that "being" is unchangeable (i.e. both being and not-being simultaneously). Ergo non-necessary being is necessary (re: PNC) as the entailed negation of the concept of "necessary being".

    Lastly, atheism denotes rejection of theism (i.e. theistic conceptions) but not any nontheisms (e.g. animism ... pandeism, acosmism).
  • Art Lies Beyond Morality
    @ucarr

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/937529
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    ↪Eros1982

    Cool— so you’re irrelevant.
    — Mikie
    :up:
  • Art Lies Beyond Morality
    Very simply, I think Morality practices 'nonreciprocal harm-prevention/reduction' whereas Art explores 'catharsis from existential limits/failures of morality' – they are complements (dialectical), not opposites (binary) – pace Nietzsche.

    (2021)
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/535255
  • "More like a blog post"
    ↪Heracloitus
    :up: :up:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    7Oct24 :fire:

    DEAR GOD,

    FREE PALESTINE
    FREE ISRAEL

    FROM THE PARTIES OF GOD. NOW!
  • Human thinking is reaching the end of its usability
    "And I'd rather be ridiculed than ignored, so thank you for the attention." :smirk:
  • The Mind-Created World
    ↪Wayfarer
    :up:
  • Human thinking is reaching the end of its usability
    Modern society is destroying itself. — Carlo Roosen
    Yes, that's entropy. :fire:

    Thinking cannot be understood by more thinking.
    And a hand cannot grasp itself just like eyes cannot see themselves and a brain cannot perceive itself. Big whup. But thinking often works, that's all we need to know. "Non-thinking" – autopilot – is involuntary therefore easy, whereas thinking (i.e. learning, creating, reflecting) is voluntary and difficult. The contrast is reflectively instructive. Read Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow

    And more broadly:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_thought

    Yesterday I wrote that I not only have to build this SHAI to save the world, I also have to get philosophy back on track.
    You have come to the right place, Carlo, for such delusions of grandeur to be ridiculed. :smirk:
  • The Mind-Created World
    ↪Wayfarer
    Carefully listen to both of the videos I've linked.
  • The Mind-Created World
    ↪Wayfarer
    :ok: No serious discussion to be had here, just your usual polemical Quantum-woo. :sparkle:
  • The Mind-Created World
    I wonder what David Deutsche's (probably unconscious) metaphysical commitments are — Wayfarer
    Listen to the discussion in the first youtube video I posted where Deutsch makes it clear he is a scientific realist (i.e. anti-antirealist ... anti-instrumentalist). The genesis of Hugh Everett's thesis is scientifically irrelevant and I lost interest immediately with Phillip Ball's idiotic / disingenuous first sentence "What the MWI really denies is the existence of facts at all." Again:
    'bad philosophy' (anti-realism) —> bad physics —> bad philosophy (woo-woo) — 180 Proof
  • The Mind-Created World
    ↪Wayfarer
    :clap: Well done, sir. As a layman I'm more or less an Everettian (as per D.Deutsch's version of the MWI) but your summary of the issues with CI & QBism is succinctly spot on. Nonetheless, to paraphrase the Persian poet Rumi: there would be no fool's gold, were there no fool (i.e. "bad philosophy" (anti-realism) —> bad physics —> bad philosophy...) To wit:


    :nerd:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    consider yourself ignored. — BitconnectCarlos
    :sweat: Of course, ignored again by the willfully ignorant ...

    https://inthesetimes.com/article/jewish-anti-zionism-israel-palestine-colonialism-annexation-apartheid

    "The wrong type of Jew?" ~zionfascists

    :fire:

    Ariel Sharon: "occupation"
    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-may-27-fg-mideast27-story.html

    re: documentary – "The Gatekeepers" (2012)
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/856307

    'Collective punishment' (e.g. domicide¹) and 'disproportionate retaliatory slaughter' of a several decades-long captive population for "October 7th" by (US client-state) Israel are, at least, ongoing war crimes. — 180 Proof
    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-01-04/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/amid-israeli-destruction-in-gaza-a-new-crime-against-humanity-emerges-domicide/0000018c-d585-d751-ad8d-ffa5965e0000 [1]

    https://fnl.mit.edu/january-march-2024/domicide-the-mass-destruction-of-homes-should-be-a-crime-against-humanity/ [1]
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    More ahistorical non sequiturs & special pleadings from an apartheid-war crimes apologist. Who tf cares? :mask:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    More non sequiturs & special pleading bullshit. :shade:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Anti-zionism is effectively anti-semitism. — BitconnectCarlos
    Oh you mean "anti-semites" like ...
    (e.g.) R. Luxemburg, S. Freud, A. Einstein, E. Fromm, P. Levi, Marek Edelman, I. Asimov, H. Arendt, I.F. Stone, N. Chomsky, H. Siegman, M. Lerner, R. Falk, T. Judt et al — 180 Proof
    https://inthesetimes.com/article/jewish-anti-zionism-israel-palestine-colonialism-annexation-apartheid :fire: :strong:

    To oppose [COLONIZER-SETTLER-APARTHEID ETHNOSTATISM] is to oppose Jewish self-determination which, if realized, would render Jews, once again, completely reliant on foreign nations for security and strip them of their autonomy....
    Yeah, because the post-1967 State of Israel has not been "completely reliant" on US (& EU/Nato) military & economic funding and logistics as well as diplomatic cover (propaganda / disinformation) for a half century ... what a lying little shit you are.
  • A Functional Deism
    As you noted, he doesn't make rational arguments — Gnomon
    And once again, like Trump, your accusation is a confession, Gnomon. :eyes: :sweat:
  • A Functional Deism
    ↪Brendan Golledge
    The member to whom I replied knows what all those terms mean.
  • A Functional Deism
    A first cause is logically necessary — Philosophim
    Maybe in metaphyasics but not for modern fundamental physics (or mathematics re: real numbers)..

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/617855
Home » 180 Proof
More Comments

180 Proof

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Other sites we like
  • Social media
  • Terms of Service
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 The Philosophy Forum