• US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    I'm not a member of the Democratic Party and I never have been.

    I do not care one bit whether or not the party organization or its nominating primary process is democratic.

    I only care that the Democratic Party is as ruthless, disciplined and united going forward to victory in Roevember 2024 as it was in 2020.

    I don't care how they engineered ("forced" "bullied") POTUS to step aside ("palace coup"?) so long as the outcome is a candidate to replace him who can curb stomp The MAGA Cult Clown to Electoral College defeat in just over a hundred days.

    In the UK, the Tories were just given their worse electoral beating in two centuries. In France, the right-wingnut populists were defeated by a concerted unity of centrist and leftist parties. The US Democratic Party with moderate independents and "Never Trump" suburban college-educated Republicans together, can do the same thoroughly rejecting the neofascist MAGA-GOP again just like 2020.

    THIS ELECTION IS NOW ABOUT TRUMP, LIKE 2020, AND NO LONGER ABOUT BIDEN. :clap:

    VPOTUS Harris isn't my first choice by a long shot, but I am confident that with a well-funded, united coalition and superior ground game (especially in the SWING STATES), aided and abetted by the deranged, angry-whining babbling bilge of bullshit The MAGA Cult Clown will continue to senilely spew and sputter this fall after Labor Day when the other 80% of the potental electorate will finally be paying attention, VP Harris (or whomever the nominee is) will win the 2024 election. Civil unrest by MAGA brownshirts & GOP shitheads notwithstanding. :fire: :mask:

    Roevember is coming! :victory:
  • Is the real world fair and just?
    But few here would remember Landru Guide UsBanno
    An old sparring partner ... :smirk:
  • The Suffering of the World
    ... my point is that you are AWARE of counterfactuals and you CHOSE this one (whatever else might be the case surrounding this decision).schopenhauer1
    Since my being "AWARE" is post hoc confabulation, I "CHOSE" before I became "AWARE" (as Libet's experiments¹, etc show) that I have "CHOSEN" (e.g. from prior "counterfactual" – imagined – options), therefore any "decision" is (mostly) unconscious² as I point out here without raising the concept of "determinism" (which is your strawman, schop1, not mine).

    .https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024487/ [1]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_effect_(psychology) [2]
  • The essence of religion
    I simply ask, what IS it that is beyond oneself?Constance
    Self itself.
  • Is the real world fair and just?
    There are various systems of paraconsistent logic that accomodate or mitigate explosive results, so I won't rule out some form of dialectic, but I won't rule it in, either. (see what I did there...?)Banno
    :smirk:
    .
  • Is the real world fair and just?
    But it remains that the sort of contradiction seen in dialectic is not the sort of contradiction found in formal logic. What a dialectic contradiction is remains, I think, ambiguous.

    And secondly, even if we supose that dialectic does not breach non-contradiction, the result is not clear. Given the Principle of Explosion, anything could follow from a contradiction, so given a thesis and an antithesis, the nature of the resulting synthesis is far from fixed.

    So I would rather not glorify dialectic by calling it a "logic".
    Banno
    :up: :up:

    Indeed, what we know is mental, but that does not imply that the world is mental...

    The argument attempts to show that the world is partially mental, but only succeeded in showing that the what we say about the world is "mental".

    That is, the argument presented here does not demonstrate it's conclusion.
    Banno
    :100:

    Yes, it's the idealist (antirealist) conflation of epistemology ("what I/we know") and ontology ("all there is") – i.e. a fly-bottle out of which @Wayfarer @Gnomon et al can't seem to find the way.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    The "formatting" helps you illiterati read and maybe even comprehend the post. Btw, you're welcome.
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    21July24

    Well, if Harris winds up the nominee ...

    :lol: :up:

    Roevember is coming!
  • The Most Logical Religious Path
    Does it matter what the primary function of religious thinking is?Igitur
    Yes, and afaik it's this ...
    [H]istory amply shows, imo, that 'religion' is required only (or at least mostly) for herding sheep, prophets making profits and sanguinary propitiating/martyring/scapegoating.180 Proof
    ergo
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/919316
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    FWIW, my guess (preference) of prospective nominees to emerge out of the Dems Convention shitshow next month:

    1. VP Harris-Gov Whitmer (likely)

    2. Gov Whitmer-Sen Warnock (less likely)

    3. Gov Whitmer-Gov Newsom (very unlikely)

    Nevertheless, MAGAts – Roevember is coming! :party:
  • The Most Logical Religious Path
    [T]here is truth to be found and that the person is willing to find it.Igitur
    Terror management (re: mortality) via reality-denial (i.e. fact-free, consoling myths & fairytales) seems the primary function of religious magical thinking (i.e. woo-woo), not "to find truth".
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    21July24

    1968 redux? (re: VP Humphery loses to gaslighting "silent majority, law & order, peace candidate" former VP Nixon) :brow:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/biden-drops-out-election-00169980

    from 2023 ...
    Yeah, in 2024 that "1 way to lose" will be the same as 2016: HRC. The Dems don't learn new tricks often ... though maybe VP Harris :yikes: (if Biden drops out of the race and the Dems don't nominate e.g. Gov Newsom, Gov Whitmer, et al) – HRC redux.180 Proof

    "Defeat from the jaws of victory?" TBD.

    edit:

    also from 2023 (if & when POTUS drops out) ...
    Whitmer for President with running-mate Newsom for Veep works just as well for me too – maybe even better!180 Proof
  • The Most Logical Religious Path
    For a hundred or so millennia many thoughtful persons have lived, thrived & died without 'being religious'. Given that eusocial living sustainably with nature alone suffices for being human, history amply shows, imo, that 'religion' is required only (or at least mostly) for herding sheep, prophets making profits and sanguinary propitiating/martyring/scapegoating.

    NB: raised and educated in Roman Catholicism, I became a freethinker, then a naturalist (i.e. anti-supernaturalist inspired by e.g. Epicurus, Spinoza) and also a pandeist some decades ago: almost five decades later, I'm still fascinated, amused and horrified by historical 'religion' both in theory & practice.
  • Is the real world fair and just?
    [@Wayfarer] wants his cake and to eat it.Banno
    :zip:
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    Trump never should be the nominee but the GOP has been shit since Reagan.Benkei
    :up:
  • Is the real world fair and just?
    It’s not a question of whether the ‘wave function’ is or isn’t mind-dependent.Wayfarer
    :roll:
  • Is the real world fair and just?
    Do you assume that 'the wavefunction' itself is mind-independent¹ (whether it 'collapses' (Copenhagen) or not (Everett))?

    Do you assume that 'the wavefunction' is mind-dependent² (whether 'mind' is intersubjective (community of observers/instruments) or divine (deity))?

    Do you assume something else?


    [1] or subject/pov/language/gauge-invariant
    [2] or subject/pov/language/gauge-variant
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    :up: Apologies for the oversight.
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    19July24

    Interesting. :chin:

    Like 2020, don't vote for the man (or the woman); vote for the mission in Roevember 2024 which is to defeat The Neofascist Crininal Clown & his rabid MAGA junta-in-waiting. :victory: :mask:

    Informed, intelligent commentary is welcome:
    @Mikie @Wayfarer @Benkei @jgill @ssu @frank @jorndoe @Mr Bee @RogueAI @tim wood
  • Simplest - The minimum possible building blocks of a universe
    :ok: If there is no objective truth, then your statement "there is no objective truth" is, at most, merely a subjective affectation – self-refuting vaporware like the cheapest after shave.
  • Questioning reality at a young age?
    Has anyone else here had a sense that what they were experiencing in early life wasn't truly real or that it was highly stripped down?TiredThinker
    I grew up before wall-to-wall vidiocracy of 24/7/365 cable tv, video games, smart phones, social media & youtubing, so definitely not because my "early life" was "truly real" for me, especially as @Vera Mont so rightly points out, nature (i.e. wilderness – through which I, a fortunate though working class NYC kid, had often backpacked & hiked since early grade school).
  • The Suffering of the World
    To lay out in its clearest terms:schopenhauer1
    Ad hoc assumptions which raise more questions than they answer – not clear at all.

    This will ever be my debate with Nietzscheans on this forum. I'm sorry but Schopenhauer cannot be surpassed by Nietzsche's contrarian view.
    Whatever. I'm not a "Nietzschean" (though I share affinities with his anti-idealist naturalism) and in my previous post I raise objections to (your) "pessimism" referring instead to Camus, Zapffe, Epicurus, Epictetus & Spinoza without invoking "Nietzsche". Try addressing my actual argument, schop1, instead of copping-out by shadowboxing with a strawman. :wink:

    ... almost each and every moment you deliberate and decide. The reasons you chose, whatever they are ...
    ... are mostly not conscious decisions / choices according to (e.g.) Buddha ... Socrates, Pyrrho ... Spinoza, Hume, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Peirce, Wittgenstein ... and corroborated by (e.g.) cognitive neuroscience, behavioral economics, embodied cognitivism & CBT. :roll:
  • Devil Species Rejoinder to Aristotelian Ethics
    This OP is about Aristotle's Eudemian and Nichomachean Ethics; not his Metaphysics, Politics, or Physics.Bob Ross
    And yet you begin with his metaphysical terms "purpose" "telos" "final causes" & "essence". :roll:

    A map is something used to know territories themselves, no?Count Timothy von Icarus
    No. Maps are used to facilitate taking paths through a simplified abstraction derived from specific types of aspects of a (factual/formal/fictional) territory.

    The idea of "essence" might be explained quite differently from how Aristotle goes about it ...
    Yet the OP concerns only Aristotle's notion of "essence".
  • The Suffering of the World
    We are the only species that bears a responsibility that no other animal must endure, that of justifying why we must do/endure anything. We are self-aware creatures, that know that we can do something counterfactual.schopenhauer1
    "Responsibility" to whom?

    "Justifying" other than that "we must"?

    Is being "self aware" also sub-personal (i.e. pre-self regulatory processes constitutive of "self") or just a superficial confabulation (i.e. token-reflexive, user-illusion)?

    It is a form of "ignoring" of the problem.schopenhauer1
    No, Camus (like Zapffe et al) recognizes 'existence' is a pseudo-problem only for idealists (or antirealists, subjectivists ... supernaturalists), that is, for those who adopt an egocentric stance of 'ontological transcendence' (pace Spinoza) that is inexorably frustrated by the ineluctable and immanent resistance-to-ego of existence (i.e. anicca, anatta ... dao ... swirling-swerving atoms recombing in void, etc). There is no "problem" that's "ignored", especially by lucid absurdists, who neither absurdly 'idealize non-ideal' existence (re: hope) nor absurdly 'nihilate non-negative' existence (re: despair), insofar as we strive – suffer – to create manifold spaces by and within which to thrive aesthetically and ethically between absurd extremes. :death: :flower:

    ... we are the species that needs the delusions ...
    ... such as "the delusion" that our "species needs delusions", etc?

    What are your "meta"-cognitive beliefs about pessimism, and what it may mean to a person?Shawn
    As schopenhauer1 suggests, the existential stance of "pessimism" is also a "delusion" for coping with, imo, a (mostly) maladaptive habit of neurotic overthinking – anxiously fearing for (pace Epicurus/Epictetus ... Spinoza) – our species-specific defects-dysfunctions aka "suffering". :fire:
  • The Suffering of the World
    It's the age-old problematic: ignorance.180 Proof
    ... the life of the ignorant, who do not understand or perceive the suffering of the world.Shawn
    A point of clarity: in this context, by "ignorance" I mean to ignore for whatever reason (e.g. naivete, sociopathy-narcissism, acculturation, ideology, remoteness-deniability, callousness-ptsd, magical thinking-otherworldliness, masochistic bias, etc).

    ... morality is more deeply rooted in emotional affectivity than in rational deliberation.Tom Storm
    :up: :up:
  • The Suffering of the World
    I'd like to ask, in correspondence with the OP, whether only through experience can one come to learn, or even know, such basic moral facts?Shawn
    Yes, through tacit experience (via childhood, socialization, pedagogy, trauma, etc) but explicitly by reflecting on experiences.

    The way the world seems to be working is that there's some kind of serious deficiency in this regard of being informed of moral facts or truths.
    It's the age-old problematic: ignorance.
  • The Suffering of the World
    Context matter. (Edited) Maybe 'right in/action' is clearer ...
  • The Suffering of the World
    I can only answer this way: ethics is, as I understand it, the study of (i.e. reflective inquiry into) the extent to which exercises of moral concern (via judgments and conduct which prevent or reduce (net) harm / injustice) cause a moral agent to flourish – to reinforce adaptive habits (i.e. virtues right in/action) which restrain maladaptive habits (i.e. vices re: wrong in/action). An observational axiom of ethics: suffering – species-specific defects which make individual species-members vulnerable to dysfunction (i.e. fear of harm / injustice) – is the most basic moral fact and thereby knowing how to decrease or increase the likelihood and severity of such defect-dysfunction is thereby the most practical moral truth.
  • Devil Species Rejoinder to Aristotelian Ethics
    Have you read the Metaphysics yet?
    –Count Timothy von Icarus

    I haven’t, but I will.
    Bob Ross
    For f*ck's sake ... :roll:

    No. Maybe. Yes, but whatever we use "to speak of the territory" (including "essences") is not the territory itself.

    :up:
  • Devil Species Rejoinder to Aristotelian Ethics
    I don't see anything wrong with the concept of an essence or final causes (telos): do you?Bob Ross
    Yes, in this context "telos" is fallaciously anthropomorphic (à la animism). Aristotle mistook – literalized / fetishized / reified – his causal mappings for the territory and called them "essences".
  • US Election 2024 (All general discussion)
    18July24
    Trump isn’t going to win. — NOS4A2
    Yeah, buddy! JD Vance is the *misogynistic gift* that will keep on giving. More of the Ultra-MAGA Hillbilly speaking in public, please. :clap:

    Roevember is coming! :victory: :mask:
  • Is Karma real?
    FWIW, my intepretive sketch from a 2022 thread Perspective on Karma ...
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/730691
  • Evidence of Consciousness Surviving the Body
    I feel like a asshole.bert1
    No doubt.

    I concede.bert1
    My questions were for @Pantagruel to clarify his specific statement which he cannot because it's gibberish. And your response, bert, isn't "paradoxical", just more semantic jugglery.
  • Evidence of Consciousness Surviving the Body
    I asked clear, direct, relevant questions here and yet you reply with an opaque non sequitur. Apparently, it's reasonable to assume (again), you don't even know what you're talking about. Okay, never mind.

    We have billions of people that look into the sky and see that the Sun travels around the Earth. The Sun rises in the East, and sets in the West. No one is saying we don't have that unified and confirmed subjective experience. But is our interpretation of that subjective experience true? No. It turns out that the Earth actually orbits the sun. But from our limited perspectives, and can feel like its the other way around.Philosophim
    :up: :up:

    Anecdotal, magical thinking dogmas abound (despite alleged philosophy graduate.studies). Geocentric flat earthers, after all, are violently allergic to counter-evidence / sound counter-arguments.
  • Evidence of Consciousness Surviving the Body
    Consciousness, in its essence, is imminently trans-individual.Pantagruel
    If so, then what makes "consciousness" mine? If it's not mine, then why should "consciousness" matter to me? If, however, "consciousness" is mine, then what does "trans-individual" mean and why should it matter to me?