The Philosophy Forum

  • Forum
  • Members
  • HELP

  • In any objective morality existence is inherently good
    Existence can be an action ... — Philosophim
    Explain how.
  • In any objective morality existence is inherently good
    existence is good — Philosophim
    – for what?

    "There should be existence"
    This statement doesn't make sense (i.e. is a category mistake) because "existence" in not an action or practice and therefore cannot be prescribed.
  • What is Philosophy?
    ↪Sam26
    :ok: If you say so ...
  • What is Philosophy?
    A kind of meta-psychotherapy? — ENOAH
    If you say so ... sorry I can't follow the rest of your post.

    So, in a very general way, it's [philosophy is] about what we believe. — Sam26
    Superficially maybe. I'd rather put it this way: philosophy consists in reflective questioning of the assumptions and implications of "what we believe" (i.e. logic-grammar-dialectics preceeds epistēmē).
  • Which theory of time is the most evidence-based?
    If the past still exists, why can't we visit it and change it? — Truth Seeker
    We do it all the time – the "visits and changes" are our memories.

    Also, all the starlight that reaches Earth is years-to-millennia millennia old and would require us to travel faster-than-light (backwards in time according to Einstein's GR) in order to reach those past stars.

    Some reasons why a "Block Time Theory" doesn't make as much sense to me as the "Growing Block Universe".
  • Is atheism illogical?
    ↪Pantagruel
    :ok: I must've missed all that ...
  • Which theory of time is the most evidence-based?
    Growing Block Universe: This theory is similar to the block universe theory but adds the idea that time is "growing" or expanding as new events come into existence. The past and present exist, but the future does not yet exist. — Truth Seeker
    This interpretation seems to me both the most evidence-based and consistent with human experience.
  • Is atheism illogical?
    ↪Pantagruel
    Okay, summarize the relevant part of Durkheim's thesis that accounts for (or explains away) this observation:

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/902702
  • Axiology is the highest good
    What they value. — Shawn
    :roll:
  • Axiology is the highest good
    ... anyone concerned about "the good." — Shawn
    And what is "the good" to "anyone" – philosopher and non-philosopher alike?
  • Axiology is the highest good
    ↪Shawn
    So only philosophers can recognize or seek "the highest good"?
  • Axiology is the highest good
    the highest good. — Shawn
    What does "highest good", as you're using the term, mean or refer to?
  • Are War Crimes Ever Justified?
    So far everyone appears to know what a war crime is except me. Anyone care to fill me in? Anyone? — tim wood
    https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml :roll:
  • Axiology is the highest good
    The thesis statement of this thread is that axiology (the study of value) is the highest good. — Shawn
    Your thesis statement is circular at best (e.g. the study of value is 'the highest value' :roll:).
  • Is "good" something that can only be learned through experience?
    ↪Shawn
    What you keep saying has nothing to do with what I've written. "Appreciation" is irrelevant to my concerns as expressed here
    ↪180 Proof
    .
  • Is "good" something that can only be learned through experience?
    Isn't the negation of disvalue, the meaning of appreciation - — Shawn
    No.

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/902327

    or maybe you meant this in terms of aesthetics?
    Also in terms of ethics and logic.

    For me, axiology is the highest good.
    Axiology is the study of value.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiology
  • What are your core beliefs?
    ↪BitconnectCarlos
    :up:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    The systematic atrocity of Netanyahu's mass murdering with impunity goes on because (A) Israel receives too much US-EU finanvial & military support and (B) Israelis aren't bleeding enough (yet) for the citizenry en mass to rise up and stop Bibi's zionfascist regime from slaughtering any more Gazans et al.
  • What are your core beliefs?
    ↪BitconnectCarlos
    The topic concerns "core beliefs" and not core delusions (e.g. pet conspiracy theories). "Brain worm" troubling you today, BC? :sweat:
  • Are War Crimes Ever Justified?
    ↪Benkei
    :up:.
  • Is life nothing more than suffering?
    Is life nothing more than suffering? — Arnie
    No. Life seems to be suffering plus *temporarily better or worse conditions / interpretations* ... I think one sustainably reduces one's own suffering – one flourishes¹ – by acquiring habits of preventing or reducing the suffering (i.e. dysfunctions, miseries, agonies, fears) of others. Btw, "happiness" is just like a full belly, more a memory than a lasting experience; many miserable persns make themselves "happy"² momentarily via addictions or criminal / sadistic acts which inevitably only compound their miseries.

    https://lisamarieblair.medium.com/eudaimonia-or-when-human-beings-flourish-b9c5943bad22 [1]
    (i.e. beneficial growth and deveopment)

    https://bigthink.com/thinking/how-to-measure-happiness-hedonia-vs-eudaimonia/ [2]
    (i.e. merely momentary comfort)
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    Trump's of course, but Trump is his own worst enemy. Trying to shame a porn-star is like trying to spice up a chili pickle. — unenlightened
    :lol: :up:
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    9May24

    Today in Trumpenfreude

    It doesn’t say ‘President Trump,’ it says ‘orange turd,’ ...

    I absolutely meant Mr. Trump.
    — Stormy Daniels while cross-examined by Trump's defense lawyer Susan Necheles
    :clap: :rofl: "Orange Turd-1"
  • Are War Crimes Ever Justified?
    ↪RogueAI
    War crimes are always "justified" by the victors. Your poll is ahistorical, therefore incoherent.

    ↪Lionino
    :up:
  • Is atheism illogical?
    Point taken. I'll remember not to cast anymore pearls before you, @BitconnectCarlos.
  • Is atheism illogical?
    No need to bring up martyrdom here. — BitconnectCarlos
    Clearly your "faith" has martyred your honesty and intelligence.

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/902594
  • Is atheism illogical?
    ↪BitconnectCarlos
    Nonsense. Martyrs usually possess an overpowering "sense of purpose" which allows (causes) them to annihilate themselves (and often others too) "in the name of" their tribal / sectarian faiths.
  • Is atheism illogical?
    ↪Vera Mont
    "Fear" of what? :smirk:

    ↪BitconnectCarlos
    And how does "an important belief" deter ... suicide?
  • Does Universal Basic Income make socialism, moot?
    I don't think UBI is intended to prevent a revolt of the masses, it's to keep them minimally contented. It's a nuisance to manage their discontent and unhappiness, not a major threat. Groups that are any sort of real threat to the establishment are not bought off with a basic income. They are confronted and attacked by the police.

    In any volatile situation, where revolt could grow out of riot, the police shoot to kill. lumpen proles (like George Floyd) have been treated pretty harshly by the police when they get out of line. It's not an aberration, it's policy.
    — BC
    :100: :fire:
  • Is atheism illogical?
    I believe that faith is a deterrent against suicide. — BitconnectCarlos
    How does faith deter anything let alone suicide?
  • What are your core beliefs?
    ↪Benkei
    :up: :up:
    Religious people are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are religious. — paraphrase of J.S. Mill (re: conservatives)
    Amen. :smirk:

    A link below to a thread dicussion ... for religious apologists like @BitconnectCarlos (of several decades of systematic collective punishment via mass murder, ethnic cleansing & apartheid)
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/851960
  • What are your core beliefs?
    ↪Moses
    Go troll somewhere else. You're stupid AF, kid. :yawn:
  • Is "good" something that can only be learned through experience?
    ↪Shawn
    I don't understand what you mean by "appreciation".
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Humans don't fight over territory and food. They fight over imaginary stories in their minds. — Yuval Noah Harari, Israeli historian
    (i.e.) Millennia of slaughtering babies & other innocents in the "Promised Land" ("Holy Land"). Countless human blood sacrifices demanded by the insatiablely jealous "God of Abraham". :eyes:

    ↪BitconnectCarlos pfff... Zionists don't take them seriously and obviously you don't either. Don't murder (Palestinian civilians). Don't steal (land). And unlimited administrative detention for Palestinians with no recourse to courts. That's 3 [Noahide] laws continously broken that you're perfectly fine with. — Benkei
    :100: :fire:

    ↪Benkei

    We must eliminate those who are intent on the murder of innocents.
    — BitconnectCarlos
    Well okay, then why not also "eliminate" the ultra-Zionist leadership of Israel and murderous Israeli colonizer-settlers in the Occupied Territories?

    Killing them is not murder.
    Yeah, that's just what the Waffen SS and its Einsatsgruppen told themselves too ... gfy, BitCunt. :shade:
  • 'The Greater Good' and my inability to form a morally right opinion on it.
    "Would you let animals like dogs die in order to create a vaccine that will save all of humanity?" — Arnie
    Only if the process is completely painless for both dogs and humans, then yes of course. I think in order to do good, at minimum, the means must sustain and not be inconsistent with (sabotage) the ends. 'The good' in this example, however, might be instrumental (e.g. scientific, technological, juridical-political), but it's not moral (i.e. not eudaimonistic).
  • Is atheism illogical?
    ... all I saw was the Void looking back at me. — Vera Mont
    Ancients called that "gnosis" or "nirvana" ... :victory: :cool:
  • Christianity - an influence for good?
    Have accusations of deicide (Matthew 27:25) and the blood libel at the heart of Christian antisemitism for over a millennium (from pogroms to inquisitions to the shoah) been "an influence for good"? I cannot forget (e.g.) that Wehrmacht soldiers wore "Gott mit uns" belt buckles or that entrances of many concentration camps bear "Arbeit Macht Frei" (paraphrase of John 8:31-32).

    addendum to
    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/901070
  • Is atheism illogical?
    ↪BitconnectCarlos
    The profoundly gullible have always deluded themselves with 'cosmic conspiracies' (e.g. Abraham's "Covenant", Christ's "Second Coming", ... Lovecraft's "Cthulhu Mythos") and yet the facts, as you say, are ... the simplest "divine plan" is – the only one that does not beg any questions – there is no divine plan. :fire:
  • Changing the past in our imagination
    ↪Athena
    Maybe ...
  • Is "good" something that can only be learned through experience?
    Do you agree with this, namely that the notion of good in inherent in the primacy of experience, and not something that can be learned by simply looking up a definition and analyzing it? — Shawn
    Yes I agree insofar as. I've come to experientially understand (any) "good" as a reflective practice of negating – effectively preventing/reducing – disvalue.
Home » 180 Proof
More Comments

180 Proof

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Other sites we like
  • Social media
  • Terms of Service
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 The Philosophy Forum