Maybe under the modern label of libertarian socialism there is "total equality" ...Does a man and a woman have total equality under the label human or humanism, in your view? — universeness
In this context, terms like "human" and "humanism" seem to me about as useful as "earthling" and "geocenrrism", respectively.My earnest answer to 'what is a man or what is masculinity,' lies within the answer to 'what is a human or what is humanism.' — universeness
As opposed to a "fake" man ... :confused:What is a real man? — Moliere
A socio-psychological topic, however, rather than philosophical aporia, no?What are the functions, or duties, normatively expected of men at (this) historical moment and by (this) culture / in (this) society? And what does such an expectation 'to be a man' mean to (for) each concretely situated person?
:up:↪180 Proof If I'm reading you correctly you're making a hard distinction between the biological and the social in how you treat the two nouns -- a man is biologically defined, and masculinity is defined in this more psychological, spiritual, ontological, or social sense. — Moliere
In a century, civilizational collapse on a global scale – population crash to below 2 billion – due mostly to catastrophic climate instability and consisting mostly of failed states and "floating" transnational corporate enclaves. — 180 Proof
For me, 0 thru 9, this example stretches the notion of 'civilization' into incoherence.I’d offer the Australian Aborigines.
65,000 years of continuing existence in the same place is a damn fine record. — 0 thru 9
Blame millennia of folk psychology (e.g. Scholastic psychologism).So do we blame old Franz for creating all of this confusion? — wonderer1
Not "nonsense", just (adaptive?) phenomenal noise in mammalian cognitive systems.Next you'll be telling us qualia is nonsense... — Tom Storm
It was written – as our exchanges are written, Wayf – by deterministic nonlinear dynamic system-agents which reflexively confabulate ex post facto intentions-of-the-gaps. :sparkle: :eyes:So how did this entry become written? By mistake? — Wayfarer
Addendum to the post excerpted above: a SciAm opinion piece by Martin Rees & Mario Livio ...If UFOs are "alien spacecraft", I suspect that they are AI-machine probes and that their parent species are either extinct or postbiological. — 180 Proof
Well, it's not altogether clear even that human thoughts "have intentionality" ... :chin:Do the outputs of ChatGPT have intentionality? — wonderer1
In 2021, the holiday was signed into law by newly elected President Biden in order to pander and/or keep a campaign promise to Black Americans who'd voted him into office in 2020 and are needed for his reelection in 2024.What is the reason for Juneteenth to be a national holiday? — TiredThinker
All decent families are alike; each corrupt family is corrupt in its own way.
The only name of the still-living that surprises me on this list is Keith Richards. :death: :flower:[ ... ] Dion
Julie Andrews
Bob Dylan
Frankie Valli
Paul McCartney & Ringo Starr
Mick Jagger & Keith Richards
Van Morrison [ ... ] — Mikie
In other words, we're talking either about hypothetical explanations for physical systems¹ or about categorical interpretations² of those explanations, respectively; the latter (metaphysics) says nothing about the objects¹ of the former (physics) but only about how to construct² a 'coherent, presuppositional / systematic synopsis' of the former. Any attempt to say 'more than physics about phusis' rather than 'generalizing from² physics about phusis' is pseudo-physics (woo) rather than metaphysics (reason). Like all X-of-the-gaps fiats (& other crackpottery), Gnomon, your so-called "Enformer" does not solve any problem in fundamental physics or cosmology and, in philosophy, merely substitutes an unknowable for a known unknown, which via infinite regress, only begs the question (Why is there anything at all? "Because the Enformer enforms all". :roll: :shade: :sweat:)... we may need to specify whether we are talking about Physics (science ;energy[experimental transformations]) or about Meta-Physics (philosophy;enformation[reflective interpretations]). — Gnomon
"They" all are. Though I'm not a fan of B5, I nonetheless tip my glass to Mr. Straczynski's creative struggle against Mammon.Maybe a new animated B5 movie will be better than no new B5?
— 180 Proof
I do think Mr Straczynski is trying to protect his 'baby' from the corporate profiteers, but I suppose it's hard to know who are the true good, bad and ugly characters in that world. — universeness
