Yeah, in 2024 that "1 way to lose" will be the same as 2016: HRC. The Dems don't learn new tricks often ... though maybe VP Harris :yikes: (if Biden drops out of the race and the Dems don't nominate e.g. Gov Newsom, Gov Whitmer, et al) – HRC redux. — 180 Proof
There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal. I know the world is bruised and bleeding, and though it is important not to ignore its pain, it is also critical to refuse to succumb to its malevolence. Like failure, chaos contains information that can lead to knowledge even wisdom. Like art. — Toni Morrison
No doubt he does because the majority of "poorly educated" (+ reality tv, WWE & social media-brain addled) US voters love "Trump". :eyes: :mask:I LOVE THE POORLY EDUCATED. — President-elect Trump, 6Nov24
:up: :up:Any chance of success went out the window in 2021, when the 3.5 trillion dollar Bernie-backed reconciliation bill was killed by Manchin and Sinema. That would have been very good for the country. Instead we got crumbs and some baby steps in climate policy. Not good enough, not impactful enough. — Mikie
I don't agree. Imo, Trump won because too many Democratic voters preferred not to vote rather than vote for a woman president just like in 2016. Biden won 15 million more votes in 2020 than Clinton won in 2016 and 13 million more votes than Harris won this year; however, Trump received about 1 million less than he did in 2020, so the election turnout drop-off was on the Dems side. As far as I can tell, too many Americans are still not "ready" for a woman president. :brow:A question for 180 Proof and any others - how much would you agree that there was too much emphasis and reliance on women votes re abortion? — Amity
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt. — Bertrand Russell
As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and a complete narcissistic moron. — H.L. Mencken
In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. — Napoleon Bonaparte
Reply intelligently to this post↪180 Proof
Leave me alone. Fuck off — schopenhauer1
:up:The rest of us need to look at this result with humility. American voters are not always wise, but they are generally sensible, and they have something to teach us. My initial thought is that I have to re-examine my own priors. I’m a moderate. I like it when Democratic candidates run to the center. But I have to confess that Harris did that pretty effectively and it didn’t work. Maybe the Democrats have to embrace a Bernie Sanders-style disruption — something that will make people like me feel uncomfortable.
— David Brooks
Gee thanks David. Glad you’re realizing this NOW.
Him, Bret Stephens, and the rest of the anti-Bernie crowd can just shut up now. — Mikie
:sweat:Fuck me.
— 180 Proof
Seems gratuitous since you've just been fucked by several million of your countrymen — Benkei
The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history. — GWF Hegel
History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce. — Karl Marx
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. — George Santayana
Damn. I was very wrong. :zip:Wishful thinking?TBD. — 180 Proof
:wink: Follow me down these rabbit holes to Wonderland, my friend ..I really wonder on what people base their predictions ... — Tobias
:up: :up:[M]any of us, most of us, don't see the world and relationships this way. This is your personal, idiosyncratic reaction to your own personal idiosyncratic problems and your solution is your personal, idiosyncratic solution. Doctoring it up with Schopenhauer doesn't change that. — T Clark
In America on the ballot today there is a simple, yet fateful question: FOR TYRANNY (Trump-Vance) OR AGAINST TYRANNY (Harris-Walz)?A republic, if you can keep it. — Benjamin Franklin, 17 September 1787
:100:[ ... ] I have no problem understanding why people follow Trump, regardless of his behavior. People are more stupid than they think and it demands effort to always be vigil of your own biases. These people have no such abilities and thus are open to a total annihilation of their inner agency, making them into zealots and drones. — Christoffer
Only that it is possible either to be or not to be 'existentially self-aware' ...Does having the capacity for existential self-awareness imply anything further than this fact? — schopenhauer1
I suppose that such a species would value immortality-projects (i.e. fetishes / technologies) higher than any other – probably as the basis of all other – values.That is to say, does a species of animal(s) that has the ability to conceptually "know" that it exists, entail anything further, in any axiological way?
Consider this recent article on how easily "betting markets" are manipulated ...
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/dont-trust-the-political-prediction-markets — 180 Proof