• Fire Ologist
    1.5k


    So you didn’t even try to define it. You should ask yourself why you don’t think a definition of your position is necessary. Why would you not simply say something about what woke is, what it does, what it positively means and points to?

    Like this:

    “Woke” refers to being aware of social injustice, but also the hidden causes of such injustice; and it means to search deeper into how injustice has been systemically built into our institutions (like the police and justice system, capitalism, patriarchy, conservatism, Christianity). Being awake or enlightened, but to the ways our traditions have let us down.

    Instead you said:

    the best candidate for a job might not be the white, male, able-bodied guy who looks like all the others and we should try to cast as wide a net as possible.

    Thousands of companies have implemented such policies successfully.
    Mijin

    That was the closet to a positive, substantive promotion of wokeness given.

    And I agree, race or sex has nothing to do with the best candidate for a job. (But doesn’t it depend on the what the job is, at least sometimes? Are there no jobs where a certain race or sex might be preferable? I just want us to acknowledge that possibility, so we don’t appear unreasonable or to have zero common sense - or do you honestly think there are absolutely no jobs on earth that aren’t best handled by one sex or one race over the other(s)?)

    But I also agree, until the 1980’s, and for some still today, many people just refused to see the fact that women and all races can be just as good at many jobs as anyone else, and to just be happy for this fact. I agree much progress has been made towards this good, equitable goal since the 1980s.

    Racism is irrational. Sexism is ignorant.

    So what could possibly be wrong with the progress wokeism has promoted since the 1980s?

    So you skipped 1, gave a small bit for 2. I’ve tried to show you how I am on the same page with you about certain progress. But now let’s try to answer 3 (which you skipped as well as it called for a critique of woke).

    What has been harmed by all of this progress? Anything?
    Is there anything illogical or incoherent or contradictory going on as this progress is being made, because if there is, don’t you think things may come crashing down as the inconsistencies rot any progress from within?

    Is the only critique of woke to come from the unwoke?

    If you don’t want to go there yet, can you tell me anything else besides “best candidate for a job might not be white” that has been good because of woke activism? What else is woke, and good medicine?
  • praxis
    6.9k
    Is the only critique of woke to come from the unwoke?Fire Ologist

    Is the only critique of anti-woke to come from the woke?
  • Fire Ologist
    1.5k
    Is the only critique of anti-woke to come from the woke?praxis

    No, and you keep proving my point by dodging.

    I’m anti-wokeness. But I also think resisting certain diversity/equity/inclusion initiatives was and remains ignorant and irrational and morally wrong. So, once again, the ball is in your court to make some sort of point.

    I agree, race or sex has nothing to do with the best candidate for a jobFire Ologist

    I also agree, until the 1980’s, and for some still today, many people just refused to see the fact that women and all races can be just as good at many jobs as anyone else, and to just be happy for this fact. I agree much progress has been made towards this good, equitable goal since the 1980s.

    Racism is irrational. Sexism is ignorant
    Fire Ologist

    Can you find any fault with DEI, wokeness, anti-conservatism? Anything at all good come from tradition and white father figures??
  • jorndoe
    4.1k
    Selecting people by merit instead of tradition/conformity seems like the right thing to do.
    Is that anti-conservative?
  • Fire Ologist
    1.5k
    Selecting people by merit instead of tradition/conformity seems like the right thing to do.
    Is that anti-conservative?
    jorndoe

    Before DEI, most people that rose to their station did so by hard work. But only white men got to play that game. So the issue before DEI wasn’t that all of these incompetent nepotism babies were running everything. The issue was that no one considered anyone besides white men when looking for replacement people.

    So “selecting people by merit” versus selecting them by “tradition/confirmity” seems like a false dichotomy. The world pre-DEI wasn’t a monarchy. (If we were having this debate in the year 1804, you might have a point, but then no one would listen to you at all unless you were a white man.)

    You need to define “conservatism” now f you want to make some point about how it’s bad. It’s not conservative to overlook merit for the sake of tradition/conformity - it’s ignorant and prejudiced. It’s a type of injustice conservative people do; but then, do you think woke people never choose fellow woke people over some republican who might actually be more competent? So you missed your mark.

    Why not just define what is good about woke?
  • Mijin
    255
    So you didn’t even try to define it. You should ask yourself why you don’t think a definition of your position is necessary.Fire Ologist

    My position though, is that the people complaining about "woke" are largely talking about a boogieman and a bunch of myths. My position IOW is that it's bullshit.
    It's not a word that I use, so why on earth would it be on me to define it?

    Is there anything illogical or incoherent or contradictory going on as this progress is being made, because if there is, don’t you think things may come crashing down as the inconsistencies rot any progress from within?

    Is the only critique of woke to come from the unwoke?
    Fire Ologist

    I just think you've got this backwards. It is a boogieman of mostly manufactured and exaggerated grievances.

    And right now in the US it's "anti-woke" that is impinging on individual and institutional freedoms -- banning books, banning words, banning protests, shutting down journalism, whitewashing history etc etc

    It's absolutely the wrong time to be saying "Oh they might have had a point though about this one cheesy diversity training at Yahoo".
  • Fire Ologist
    1.5k
    it's "anti-woke" that is impinging on people's and institutional freedomsMijin

    So you won’t say what is woke, but the anti-woke is a clear threat.

    Institutional freedoms? Like the wonderful judicial system that, used to be hated for incarcerating too many victims of racism, but is now under threat from the president?

    Institutional freedoms like the rule of law, which would include border immigration reform?

    The reason woke thinkers won’t define “woke” is because it would reveal its incoherence and contradictions.

    manufactured and exaggerated grieveancesMijin

    Enough to elect an idiot like Donald Trump? Twice?

    You just don’t want to look directly at wokeness and criticize it.

    European men are some of the smartest and best leaders in history.
    Woman, generally, are smaller and physically weaker than men.
    One man and one woman, married, as mother and father, typically provide the basis of a good family, and typically the best situation to raise a child.

    Why should anyone cringe at hearing the above? Because it’s not woke.
  • Mijin
    255
    So you won’t say what is woke, but the anti-woke is a clear threat.Fire Ologist

    Correct. Because while "woke" is some amorphous term at this point, there are people who self-identify as "anti-woke".
    Institutional freedoms? Like the wonderful judicial system that, used to be hated for incarcerating too many victims of racism, but is now under threat from the president?Fire Ologist

    Both of these statements are correct too. I don't know what point you think you're making.
    More than one thing can be true at the same time. That in the past, and less so today, the courts have favored some racial groups over others. The data on sentencing is very clear.
    And MAGA is trying to weaponize the judicial system against their political enemies while pardoning their cronies. Both these things are bad.

    Institutional freedoms like the rule of law, which would include border immigration reform?Fire Ologist

    The rule of law does not entail any particular immigration policy, but what it does entail is things like due process; not unidentified men kidnapping people from the streets and deporting them to Ecuador against court rulings.

    The reason woke thinkers won’t define “woke” is because it would reveal its incoherence and contradictions.Fire Ologist

    I have to lol at this thread, and your ranting about woke, and you can't even define it. You're insisting on a "No, you!" attitude, when I'm not using the word. I think it's meaningless bullshit.
    One man and one woman, married, as mother and father, typically provide the basis of a good family, and typically the best situation to raise a child.

    Why should anyone cringe at hearing the above? Because it’s not woke.
    Fire Ologist

    I don't cringe, I just think it's closed-minded.
    The basis of a good family is loving parents and/or guardians, and a state that can help support families where needed.

    And I generally think society is best not getting involved in how people pair up or form families, except when children aren't being cared for adequately. We should always default to freedom.
  • Fire Ologist
    1.5k
    and you can't even define it.Mijin

    :rofl: Who is leaning on “can’t define it” now? That was my line! I am happy to get started on a definition any time. What do you need? A definition of woke?
    I did get a general sense of woke started for us:

    “Woke” refers to being aware of social injustice, but also the hidden causes of such injustice; and it means to search deeper into how injustice has been systemically built into our institutions (like the police and justice system, capitalism, patriarchy, conservatism, Christianity). Being awake or enlightened, but to the ways our traditions have let us down.Fire Ologist

    What do you think? Where am I off on the wrong foot? What needs to be added?
  • Fire Ologist
    1.5k
    My position IOW is that it's bullshit.Mijin

    Ok, but there are all different flavors of bullshit. I’m sure you can say something of what wokeness is that makes the anti-woke, anti-woke, and not some other flavor of bullshit artist. (And just the fact that you use the word “bullshit” makes me want to agree with you; it’s one of my favorite philosophic terms of art, but…)

    You can’t clarify exactly how the anti-woke are living in fantasy grievance land a bit more? What do you think they see as they make their false grievances? You can’t imagine at all, after all the grievances you’ve heard?

    How is “anti-woke” so clearly bullshit, but “woke” can mean nothing to you? Seems a bit superficial.

    you've got this backwards. It is a boogieman of mostly manufactured and exaggerated grievances.Mijin

    Ok. Anti-woke people see a boogieman. Fine.

    Do the anti-antiwoke (such as yourself) see any boogie men?

    Isn’t a straight-white-man a sort of boogieman for the woke? What if he’s rich too? A capitalist white prep school nepo baby with some German/Italian/Irish in his veins. No reason not to pick on such a person, right? I can use them as a stand in for any theft, lie, rape, conspiracy, murder, war, and I am within bounds of respectable argumentation. All white men are the same on some level, because they are all white men. Right?

    Now here is why you are wrong that the anti-woke are merely fabricating a boogieman: Will I ever get fired if I get caught saying any of that in this context? No way. How about if I said this about some other race? Do you think I could make any point talking about some non-white person without inviting utter condemnation and disgust? Think about it. Wokeness is very entrenched. The woke police are everywhere there are groups of people. One of us will always be willing to correct those who are micro-oppressing (regardless of the context…) DEI has altered our etiquette so much that we pay real lip service to utter bullshit and we don’t even notice.

    This thread is called “the End of Woke”. THAT is bullshit. Woke is 100 years old in Europe (white men like Marx inspired it). It’s not going anywhere. It ain’t dead. Trump and MAGA could just as easily turn out to be a death rattle for the notion that some things are old for a good reason.

    Could Trump be a boogieman (how dare I even suggest such a theory!)
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.