Perhaps Palestinians should remove logs from their own eyes. And it may be that's what they have to do. With Yasser, the PLO, and friends and Hamas and Hezbollah, to name just a few of the more recent, they have sown or have had sown on their "behalf" an entire forest of enmity. — tim wood
So, let me get this straight - the Muslims are unfortunately "infected" with anti-semitism, and since this is part of their nature and cannot be cured, Israel must unfortunately murder them until they are no longer a threat? — Echarmion
One day you will say something of substance.
But it isn't today. — StreetlightX
Well, quarantine isn't working, is it. And while I am myself sympathetic to the notion that killing in war is murder, I don't think it stands as a matter of reason. As to collateral casualties, it seems to me the first business of the Palestinians is to get the terrorists out from behind their children and from under their skirts, as noted above. If the Israelis become murderers, certainly the terrorists already are. Perhaps if the Palestinians arrested a few, tried them, and on conviction punished them. Like that's about to happen! — tim wood
So, Joshua lead a horde of rabid Hebrew tribes to steal Canaanite land (i.e. ethnic cleansing) through mass rapine slaughter at the behest of voices in his fucking head (and voices in dead Moses' fucking head) more than three millennia ago AND THAT "justifies" modern Israelis claim now to "the Jewish Promised Land" and therefore their ("divine birth")right to gradually reenact that ur-myth atrocity by nearly eight decades of dispossessing a centuries-long settled Arab population in order to ethnically cleanse the lands between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea for "Der Judenstaat, Der Judenstaat" über alles? Well, Bitcon et al, to quote my beloved Hillel the Elder: G-F-Y. :shade:I don't know what else to tell you besides ancient/religious texts and Jewish oral history. Jews have prayers going back thousands of years that speak to this issue. — BitconnectCarlos
Imagine if this discussion was about slavery and someone responded in this manner. — Maw
Textbook example of how many self-described philosophers end up kicking up so much dust just for the sake of it that everything becomes opaque. The result is as you see here: resorting to pseudo-intellectualism as apologia for colonial atrocities. Imagine if this discussion was about slavery and someone responded in this manner. — Maw
More strawman bullshit. Mazel tov, Bitcon. Now go somewhere else and jerk yourself off. — 180 Proof
Most Japanese people actually really like foreigners in my experience. — khaled
here.
What on earth is an ‘oppressor’ and what could ‘Legitimate’ possibly mean? The answer depends of course on whether you’re a relativist TWAT and how far you’re willing to take that. For me, the belief that such notions can be defined in anything but a hopelessly partisan way is at the heart of most conflicts.
— Joshs
In any violent, vicious conflict, whom do you side with, Joshs: the weaker or the stronger? "David" or "Goliath"? Hint: The answer is fucking partisan. :shade: — 180 Proof
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.