Thanks for starting this engaging discussion :sparkle: — Amity
My first series of thoughts: Why do you ask? Why would we want to develop? How do we know what, if anything, is wrong with our current status? — Amity
Perhaps we need to pay more or less attention; observe what is happening right now.
As you say, what is your 'base-line'?
Where are you at in your life? Think about your values regarding care of body, mind and spirit?
What are your usual habits or patterns of thought, emotions and behaviour?
Are they helping or harming you or others? — Amity
Turn to philosophy? — Amity
It would be good if you could expand on the sources you found helpful; what 'path' have they walked? — Amity
Also, what tools and how have you adapted them to suit your needs? — Amity
Perhaps, borrowing from a Stoic's perspective? — Amity
If you are interested in cultivating an awareness of awareness then Idealism is a logical avenue.
Interesting!
I've spent the majority of my almost 29 years operating primarily from my mind, with very little flow going to my body or spirit. I am coming to understand now that we need balance and that by hiding away in my labyrinth of thoughts, I have not fully allowed myself previously to face and accept reality without some degree of distortion of truth.
It is because of this actually, that a healthy bit of skepticism in my observation of the thinking mind has found it's way into my field of view. I've been inspired to seek clarity, both with and without myself as a subject in the matter.
Perhaps due to over correction at this point in my journey, I am not quite certain in this moment how to approach the idea that our reality itself is dependent upon our thoughts. It seems to me that this is giving oneself a tremendous amount of power, influence and special regards over that which we just happen to be existing around, in and within.
It makes sense to me however, to insert perception into this as in to say that our perception of reality is dependent upon the state and quality of mind. If my mind is sound and I balanced, then I might see the truth of reality more clearly then if I were peering through...outdated lenses which need an updated prescription.
— Pantagruel
Simultaneously an exploration of the relationship between acting and conceptual knowledge, and where the thought of a concept becomes the concept of thought, becomes thought. — Pantagruel
awareness of awareness — Pantagruel
Is your first thought aware of itself? Or is your second thought a reflection on your first thought (as mine is).
My feeling is that thought distracts awareness away from the present into the labyrinth of thought. Thus the suggestion is that thought and effort in this matter are counterproductive, as if one would strain to relax. the only 'how' to relaxation is to strain, and then stop straining. Think very hard about stopping thinking, and then stop. — unenlightened
This is a different way of thinking about awareness than mine, but it's interesting and well thought out. It made me go back and look closer at how I experience my own awareness — T Clark
I agree that thought can be labyrinthian; a complex structure of pathways which can be a confusing maze and amazing.
It is always present and will not be stopped.
The effort to do so, in my mind, would be counter-productive.
It is more about training the mind. And that takes thought. And awareness. And focus. — Amity
There is an assumption common to meditative practice and cognitive science that one can make a distinction between a pre-reflective and a reflective form of awareness , and a distinction between attention and what what one attends to. But if reflecting on one’s consciousness is distorting, then so is the ‘pre-reflective’ experience of awareness. Any form of consciousness or awareness is an awareness of something other than itself. There is no self to be aware of except a self that arrives to us from the world every moment as a changed self. To turn back to oneself, to turn ‘inward’ in order to examine the being of consciousness is a being exposed to an outside. Studying consciousness is studying g self-transformation, and this means participating in the transformation rather than standing outside of it. — Joshs
I don't understand what you mean by the question. — Tom Storm
Sure, people bark on about consciousness and awareness all the time (especially in California), but what are you specifically referring to and what are you hoping to find? — Tom Storm
If you don't think that these sorts of questions matter very much, why are you allowing this discussion to take up space within your mind?Personally I don't think these sorts of questions matter very much. — Tom Storm
↪Deus
I am presenting some questions and my sincere view of the OP. These terms are so broad and used so differently and ubiquitously that I am curious what s/he means. I have my own thoughts based on decades of reading/living, but when we ask questions here it is not always because we don't have an answer, it is to find out more from the other person.
This OP to me is far from clear. Also, I do think setting yourself a task of self-awareness is pointless. Self-awareness, like happiness, is not something you can aim for - it happens as a result of other things. Like paying attention while you live your life.
Analysis is paralysis
- J Krishnamurti New York 1974 — Tom Storm
Consciousness is the attunement of all senses to thinking processes.
By attuned I mean the processing of sensory input for the organisms interaction with environment. But it goes beyond this to include the area of pure thought/reason as elucidated by Kant who provided more than a satisfactory answer on the matter. — Deus
I'm here to speak for poetry. I don't get a lot of it, but when I do, it goes somewhere really different than non-fiction or fiction. It can lead to awareness of a whole different part of who I am.
Just because you don't get it doesn't mean there's nothing to get. I feel the same way you do about poetry about jazz. I don't get it. It doesn't move me. On the other hand, I can see there's something there. Even if it doesn't work for me, I can see and hear value while not participating. Also, a lot of people whose judgement I respect are moved by it. — T Clark
And then when it comes to the socially constructed aspect of selfhood, you would want to understand the implications of what you are taking on board. There are choices. But few ever realise this is the game. They just go for what’s on the shelf as the expected purchase. And if not that, they shop in the gluten free or organic aisle instead. — apokrisis
I'm late to the game in getting around to these responses but the energy and effort is still bouncing around in here and wants to move! — Universal Student
I feel a smidge out of my league. — Universal Student
I have the sense that I am on the younger end of the spectrum of folks here — Universal Student
If I may, how would you describe the experience of awareness from the outside? — Universal Student
This is interesting. I'll have to think more about these distinctions. How did you come to the...awareness, that awareness is pre-verbal? This brings up quite a bit for me. — Universal Student
Would we say then that awareness is the knowing that there is something occurring within ourselves — Universal Student
Is awareness in whatever degree of clarity you happen to experience it really yours or are you experiencing awareness and privy to something outside of yourself, within yourself? — Universal Student
I don't think awareness has anything to do with knowing. For me t has to do with paying attention. — T Clark
The average age of forum members is 86. We call anyone under 60 a youngster. Anyone under 45 is a whippersnapper. — T Clark
What if we re-framed this instead as someone suspecting that they are experiencing greater degrees of awareness and consciousness and as a result, they experience this mental initiation into the new and unfamiliar territory. Does this change anything for you? — Universal Student
Also, what harm can come of asking these kinds of questions? If a conversation doesn't attract us, we can easily access our freedom to move on to another which speaks to us more deeply. — Universal Student
For some reason, none of your tags of my name show up in my "Mentions" page. If I don't respond to a comment of yours, that may be why. — T Clark
I never said there was harm. But now you raise it, there are plenty of people I've known across the decades who have disappeared up their own rectums through a process J Krishnamurti describes as 'analysis paralysis'. Self-refection can become compulsive and end up in ceaseless inaction and solemn festering. There is also a lot of explicit and implicit status seeking bound up in the self-reflection movement as people jostle to prove their innate sensitivities and higher awareness to others and themselves. — Tom Storm
If you don't think that these sorts of questions matter very much, why are you allowing this discussion to take up space within your mind? — Universal Student
I think it's pretty important to explore and talk about the things you don't believe in, don't you? I get a lot from hearing what others believe and why. :wink: — Tom Storm
I think that it is arrogant to be unwilling to do so. — Universal Student
↪Pantagruel
Could be. Just as mistakes are often the necessary path to success. — Tom Storm
There could also be people who may be unable to do so. How would we know which is in operation? — Tom Storm
To develop, we need to have or be shown skills; to identify moods, their causes, the tools to manage any problems. Understanding ourselves and others, to relate better is vital for holistic wellbeingness. — Amity
a kind of developmental barrier to the ability — Universal Student
This is one of several passages that say something similar - knowledge leads to artificiality - a false sense of self. I've had arguments about this before. Lao Tzu can't possibly mean that knowledge is bad, but I think he means just that. A release from knowledge and surrender to experience is what self-awareness is for me. — T Clark
Is there hierarchical thinking predicated in this construction? You've stated that you privileged self-awareness/journeys of personal transformation, so it would follow that someone who does not is developmentally challenged, right? What if they are not? What if they simply do not share your perspective. Does this suggest a lesser being?
I'll grant you that one of the most fascinating things about people are the intricate pathways they take to getting in their own way. — Tom Storm
I don't mean in the way of intellect. — Universal Student
I'll grant you that one of the most fascinating things about people are the intricate pathways they take to getting in their own way. — Tom Storm
Perhaps knowledge that is overly identified with, held fast to and solitary instead of used wisely as an aspect the whole navigation process through life is the danger?
An idolization of knowledge, if you will. — Universal Student
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.