• god must be atheist
    5.1k
    Helping out your ratio while simultaneously pointing out that if you don't want to objectify your partner, "There is no one more erotic, nor beautiful than my partners face as she orgasms." Would be the better way to phrase this... If she happens to like being objectified (a known kink) then forget I said anything and carry on!MSC

    I think that's how object-oriented programming took initial shape. A bunch of sexually frustrated programmers who objectify sexual objects into objects to sub for partners in their abject lack of finding a suitable subject being a reject, etc etc etc, I'll leave it to you to fill out the rest.
  • MSC
    207
    I think that's how object-oriented programming took initial shape. A bunch of sexually frustrated programmers who objectify sexual objects into objects to sub for partners in their abject lack of finding a suitable subject being a reject, etc etc etc, I'll leave it to you to fill out the rest.god must be atheist

    Hahahaha! That made me laugh :') explains all the female armour in almost every video game. Metal bikinis and shit.
  • Pfhorrest
    4.6k
    Your phrasing would suggest that the face is a person. The partner is a “one”, but her face is a “thing”.
  • Hanover
    13k
    There is nothing more erotic, nor beautiful, than my partner's face as she orgasms.Banno

    Obviously you've never seen @Baden at just the right moment in just the right light.
  • god must be atheist
    5.1k
    ↪MSC Your phrasing would suggest that the face is a person. The partner is a “one”, but her face is a “thing”.Pfhorrest

    "One" as in the god-thread? Or one as in one person at a time? Single line, no pushing. While in the line.
  • god must be atheist
    5.1k
    ↪MSC Your phrasing would suggest that the face is a person. The partner is a “one”, but her face is a “thing”.Pfhorrest

    My genius friend Paul S. came up to me one day, and asked me, "Is the sum of a woman better than her whole?"
  • praxis
    6.5k
    Like the One, a whole is useless by itself.
  • Baden
    16.4k


    I actually sent that video to everyone. Don't be jelly.
  • Pfhorrest
    4.6k
    "One" as in the god-thread?god must be atheist

    No, as in someONE vs someTHING, which is the change they made.

    A person is someONE, but their face is someTHING, so if we are describing the beauty of a person’s face, it’s not objectifying the person to say that their face is a beautiful THING.
  • MSC
    207
    A person is someONE, but their face is someTHING, so if we are describing the beauty of a person’s face, it’s not objectifying the person to say that their face is a beautiful THING.Pfhorrest

    I know. I was merely playing.
  • god must be atheist
    5.1k
    A person is someONE, but their face is someTHING, so if we are describing the beauty of a person’s face, it’s not objectifying the person to say that their face is a beautiful THING.Pfhorrest

    I know. I was merely playing.
  • Banno
    25.3k
    Hmm. 1.01
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    A. One's comments
    1. Good (reasonable/knowledegable/insightful) (G)
    2. Bad (unreasonable/ignorant/irrelevant) (B)

    B. Being mentioned
    3. Approving good comments (A)
    4. Disapproving bad comments (D)



    The ratio doesn't reflect how valuable a member is to the forum (small G, large B & small A, D G, as when you're ignored, would mean a ratio 1).
  • Banno
    25.3k
    1.05.
  • Wayfarer
    22.8k
    also mine :-)
  • Banno
    25.3k
    And you are only a couple of thousand behind in total posts. You seem to be catching up.
  • Wayfarer
    22.8k
    Something which is a cause for concern. I keep telling myself I'm spending far too much time chatting here, but

  • Patterner
    1.1k
    Is there a count somewhere? I only use my cell phone. I've noticed other things not easy to use or find that are right there the couple times I've logged in on a desktop or laptop. Maybe this is another.
  • fdrake
    6.7k
    0.96, an improvement.
  • fdrake
    6.7k


    Posts and mentions are below your name on any page. For me that's page top, screen top left on a web browser.
  • Patterner
    1.1k

    Yeah, different on my cell. I see my avatar and make at all my posts, and it says 795 posts. This will be 796. But not mentions. I can find mentions in a menu, bit it doesn't give a count. I'll grab a laptop some time and see. Not that it matters. Only 796 posts isn't going to be as informative..
  • javi2541997
    5.9k
    1.05Banno

    Wow. So, you were mentioned more than 25K times in TPF. That's crazy.

    Mine is 0.8. 4.7K mentions. You mates typed "Javi" 280 times.
1234Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.