Helping out your ratio while simultaneously pointing out that if you don't want to objectify your partner, "There is no one more erotic, nor beautiful than my partners face as she orgasms." Would be the better way to phrase this... If she happens to like being objectified (a known kink) then forget I said anything and carry on! — MSC

I think that's how object-oriented programming took initial shape. A bunch of sexually frustrated programmers who objectify sexual objects into objects to sub for partners in their abject lack of finding a suitable subject being a reject, etc etc etc, I'll leave it to you to fill out the rest.

I think that's how object-oriented programming took initial shape. A bunch of sexually frustrated programmers who objectify sexual objects into objects to sub for partners in their abject lack of finding a suitable subject being a reject, etc etc etc, I'll leave it to you to fill out the rest. — god must be atheist

Hahahaha! That made me laugh :') explains all the female armour in almost every video game. Metal bikinis and shit.

Your phrasing would suggest that the face is a person. The partner is a “one”, but her face is a “thing”.

There is nothing more erotic, nor beautiful, than my partner's face as she orgasms. — Banno

Obviously you've never seen @Baden at just the right moment in just the right light.

↪MSC Your phrasing would suggest that the face is a person. The partner is a “one”, but her face is a “thing”. — Pfhorrest

"One" as in the god-thread? Or one as in one person at a time? Single line, no pushing. While in the line.

↪MSC Your phrasing would suggest that the face is a person. The partner is a “one”, but her face is a “thing”. — Pfhorrest

My genius friend Paul S. came up to me one day, and asked me, "Is the sum of a woman better than her whole?"

Like the One, a whole is useless by itself.

I actually sent that video to everyone. Don't be jelly.

"One" as in the god-thread? — god must be atheist

No, as in someONE vs someTHING, which is the change they made.

A person is someONE, but their face is someTHING, so if we are describing the beauty of a person’s face, it’s not objectifying the person to say that their face is a beautiful THING.

A person is someONE, but their face is someTHING, so if we are describing the beauty of a person’s face, it’s not objectifying the person to say that their face is a beautiful THING. — Pfhorrest

I know. I was merely playing.

A person is someONE, but their face is someTHING, so if we are describing the beauty of a person’s face, it’s not objectifying the person to say that their face is a beautiful THING. — Pfhorrest

I know. I was merely playing.

Hmm. 1.01

A. One's comments
1. Good (reasonable/knowledegable/insightful) (G)
2. Bad (unreasonable/ignorant/irrelevant) (B)

B. Being mentioned
3. Approving good comments (A)
4. Disapproving bad comments (D)

$\frac{Mentions}{Comments} = \frac{G + B}{A + D}$

The ratio doesn't reflect how valuable a member is to the forum (small G, large B & small A, D $\leq$ G, as when you're ignored, would mean a ratio $\geq$ 1).

1.05.

also mine :-)

And you are only a couple of thousand behind in total posts. You seem to be catching up.

Something which is a cause for concern. I keep telling myself I'm spending far too much time chatting here, but

Is there a count somewhere? I only use my cell phone. I've noticed other things not easy to use or find that are right there the couple times I've logged in on a desktop or laptop. Maybe this is another.

0.96, an improvement.

Posts and mentions are below your name on any page. For me that's page top, screen top left on a web browser.

Yeah, different on my cell. I see my avatar and make at all my posts, and it says 795 posts. This will be 796. But not mentions. I can find mentions in a menu, bit it doesn't give a count. I'll grab a laptop some time and see. Not that it matters. Only 796 posts isn't going to be as informative..

1.05 — Banno

Wow. So, you were mentioned more than 25K times in TPF. That's crazy.

Mine is 0.8. 4.7K mentions. You mates typed "Javi" 280 times.

Update:

0.85

5.2K mentions.

I am stuck!

Alternatively, the higher ratio could be indicative of engaging in political bait posts and trolling :naughty:

Maybe I'll set up a sticky post demanding that, in line with current executive orders, all American posters MUST sign each post with:

"HAIL TRVMP, AVGVSTVS! HAIL VANCE, CEASAR!"

And banning the sharing of traitorous Vance memes:



(I have legit forgot what the guy actually looks like at this point)

That ought to be good for some replies.

Trump is more Pompey than Augustus. He's showing the right how to undermine the judiciary and legislature. I doubt Vance has the wherewithal to take the next step. Musk is too unpopular. In the wings, someone is biding their time, to move to "save" the US from the coming economic disaster.

But the one to watch, the one who might be "little boots", is "X"; entitled nose-picking critic of The Orange Emperor.


Still 1.05.

1.02
Did I win? — unenlightened

1.4, but only because I tend to reply to multiple comments in one post.

And no, I do not win, because I'm sure there are some with ratios greater than 3, and they're terrible contributors for it. Joe comes in, makes an interesting OP (gathering 20 replies), but Joe never comes back and tends his topic. I see that a lot.

How do I know how many mentions I’ve had?

it's clear on the home page on desktop. Not so easy to find on mobile

I was editing my screenshot to show you how, but was faster than me.