It is enough to achieve your goals though, in fact its all you can do. It seems to me the hidden problem for you is the timetable. You cannot achieve such lofty goals in a single lifetime, your goals are not something you can enforce or convince on the massive scale of the whole of humanity. Yours goals will take time. A lot of time. Look at history and you see how things, very slowly, change. It happens by leading by example, spreading your ideas and leading your life with those goals in mind.
So when I say keep doing what you're doing I dont mean because you cannot achieve your goals but rather because that is the way, the only way, to achieve your goals.
Make the best contribution you can while you're here and let the ripple effect of your hard work shape the future. Thats the only way progress to your goals that has ever been made, you just have to have the long view. — DingoJones

I see your point. I am being too impatient. I want to see rapid changes, but that is impossible. Thank you for sharing your wisdom.

Sounds like you're achieving your goals... at a scale appropriate for your level of influence. Kudos to you. Job well done. — LuckyR

Thank you - sadly, my capacity is limited. Although I have managed to save and improve some lives - the world is still full of suffering, injustice, and death. How do I unite everyone to achieve the objectives together?

If you're an American elector, supporting the Democratic Party would be a good start. The MAGA party seems intent on dismantling or opposing everything you're standing for. — Wayfarer

I don't live in the USA. I live in the UK. I don't agree with Donald Trump's policies.

Your list covers pretty much everything that might need doing. That's the main part of your problem. You've heard of hubris? add "Diminish my hubris" to the list. — BC

I don't have hubris. I am so sad about all the suffering, injustice, and death in the world. At least 99.9% of all the species to evolve so far on Earth are already extinct. The climate crisis has placed the remaining 0.1% at risk of extinction. Humans have killed hundreds of millions of humans across the world and trillions of other species in the last 300,000 years. I long to change the past, but I can't. I long to change the present, but people keep doing selfish things, e.g. murder, exploit, rape, torture, cheat, steal, bully, etc. Less than 1% of the 8.23 billion humans currently alive are vegan. There is so much poverty, inequality, ignorance and disease in the world. I have failed to achieve my objectives.

How can I unite everyone to achieve the 14 worldwide objectives?

Look after your own actions; try to be the kind of person you wish we all were. — BC

I am already kind to everyone. It's not enough that I am kind to everyone or else the objectives would have been achieved many years ago. Everyone needs to be kind to everyone. How do I get everyone to be kind to everyone?

Not by yourself. That much is clear. — Banno

I totally agree. How can I unite everyone towards achieving the 14 worldwide objectives?

As a fellow dreamer of a better tomorrow whose tried more than one thing I can tell you that I, at least, had to recognize my limit as an individual. — Moliere

You are right in that I have very limited abilities. If I could unite all humans with the goal of achieving the 14 worldwide objectives, then we could make it happen. How can I unite everyone?

keep doing what youre doing? — DingoJones

The problem is that living things are suffering and dying every second. Keeping doing what I am doing is not enough to achieve the goals.

To the extent the problems you identify are soluble at all, it would only be through political action. — T Clark

How would I achieve global political action?

You obviously can't save lives forever, do you just want a quantitative amount of lives saved? — Red Sky

Some organisms are biologically immortal, e.g. planarian flatworms, immortal jellyfish, hydra, etc. If we could genetically engineer all living things to be biologically immortal and place them in spaceships to visit other star systems, thus spreading life across the universe, lives could be saved forever.

What exactly do you mean by religious harmony? (One religion, or just coexistence and acceptance) — Red Sky

By religious harmony, I mean the peaceful coexistence of people with different religious and secular beliefs. Hundreds of millions of people have been murdered across the world over the millennia by both religious and secular people. It is still happening despite our scientific advances. I am so sad about all the suffering, injustice, and death.

I would say unless you're the billionaire batman, you will need to gain the support of many people. — Red Sky

I don't have much money. How would I get all the people to unite and work together to achieve the 14 worldwide objectives?

The important thing in choice is that you are the one making it, and not others. — Red Sky

Thank you for your kindness and for sharing your experience with me, and for your advice.

Getting a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc opinion would also qualify as getting more information before making a decision. — Harry Hindu

I didn't seek a second opinion. I wish I had. Sadly, I can't change the past.

That is an unanswerable question, and best not to waste time contemplating it as it would just make your depression worse. — Harry Hindu

I agree. Thank you for your wise advice.

It's not your fault. It's not your fault. It's not your fault. — Good Will Hunting

I watched this movie many years ago. Thank you very much for reminding me of it and also for your insight.

Think of trying for the best as Offense and avoiding the worst as Defense. — LuckyR

This is a very interesting idea. Thank you very much for this advice.

This means I am never "second guessing" myself because everything is done to a framework, applicable at all times. — AmadeusD

Thank you very much for sharing your system for making choices. I love it.

I wish you had had a better psychiatrist. — unenlightened

Thank you. CPTSD and Bipolar Disorder make a difficult combo to treat. I also wish I had better treatment than what I had. I have been on so many medications in the last 27 years and 3 months. I wish they had given me EMDR and Schema Therapy back in March 1998. I had EMDR in 2024 which helped. I am waiting to have Schema Therapy.

A book that might help, "Prudence: Choose Confidently, Live Boldly." — Leontiskos

Thank you very much for the book recommendation. I look forward to reading it.

What do you see as your mistake in this instance? What is the thing you wish you had done differently? — Leontiskos

I wish I had listened to my parents instead of listening to my psychiatrist. Sadly, I can't change the past.

by making choices that eliminate the worst outcome — LuckyR

Thank you very much for your advice.

You made the best possible decision given the information you had at that moment. — Harry Hindu

It's not just a matter of having access to information. It's also a matter of who to trust. I chose to trust a qualified and experienced psychiatrist over my parents because I thought that was the right thing to do. I can't even come off the 600 mg of Quetiapine XL I take per night because my brain has become dependent on this medication, and I can't function without it. I am depressed even though I take such a high dose.

Only if you were Caligula, Hitler or Stalin. — Harry Hindu

I meant whether my nonexistence would have been better for me, compared to the life I have lived so far, which has been mostly suffering. Also, my nonexistence would have prevented all of my negative and positive impacts on others and the world e.g. ecological footprint. I am a Vegan, Egalitarian, Sentientist.

I have come through life almost scar free and I have lead an ordinary life but an enjoyable one. — Malcolm Parry

I am glad that you have had an easy life. I had many traumatic experiences from age 4 onwards. I am not going to go into the details of them because it is hard for me, and also I don't want to distress you and others.

you are where you are and decisions going forward are the only ones that matter. — Malcolm Parry

I agree because I can't change the past. Thank you for sharing your experience and for your advice. I am exercising daily but it is hard. I have a healthy diet but my problem is that my medication causes weight gain. I am also trying to learn computer programming which I find hard because of my depression and because of my age. I am 47.

While freedom is a curse, it is also life's greatest blessing, and I say this with total sincerity. Llfe truly wouldn't be living without freedom.

Much more to be said, but what do you think of that so far? — hypericin

Thank you for sharing your experience and thoughts. I am so sorry that you, too, have the burden of regretting taking psychiatric medications.

I don't feel free. Do you feel free?

Here are some things I have done, currently do or will do even though I don't want to do them:

1. Breathe
2. Eat
3. Drink
4. Sleep
5. Dream
7. Pee
8. Poo
9. Fart
10. Burp
11. Sneeze
12. Cough
13. Age
14. Get ill
15. Get injured
16. Sweat
17. Cry
18. Suffer
19. Snore
20. Think
21. Feel
22. Choose
23. Be conceived
24. Be born
25. Remember some events
26. Forget some events
27. Die

I really want to go back in time and prevent all suffering, injustice, and death and make all living things forever happy, but I lack the capacity to do this.

Seems to me that the key is other people. Keep reaching out. And keep in mind that while you don't know what will happen next, sometimes things get better.

You are welcome to PM me. — Banno

Thank you for your advice and your kindness.

I use heat therapy (e.g. electric blanket, heat patches, hot water bottle, etc.) to reduce the intensity of the pain, as pain-relieving medications for chronic nerve pain make my Bipolar Disorder worse.

More likely, you would be equally discontent but with a different set of issues. — Banno

I agree with you. Wouldn't it have been better if I had never existed at all?

In terms of suicide of why you should stay alive it breaks down to practicality and it’s something out of my remit to advise on personal choices and circumstances. — kindred

My goal is to save and improve as many lives as possible. Obviously, suicide doesn't save my life, but it does end my suffering, which is a kind of improvement. Also, my donated organs will save the lives of others. Don't the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one? Although my suicide would cause suffering to those who love me. Also, it would prevent any future good deeds by me, e.g. I have donated blood many times.

There are factors involved when making choices and these are often a matter of personal preference. — kindred

How would I know what personal preference I should have? It's not always clear if the outcome would be positive for me and others. For example, I am on the NHS Organ Donation Register. I have been on it since May 1997. If I were to kill myself, it would end my constant suffering (due to Bipolar Disorder, CPTSD and chronic pain) and save the lives of those who need organs to live. So, should I kill myself? I am certain that my parents would be very upset if I killed myself. That's one of the reasons I haven't yet killed myself.

Do you know why this happens? Are you haunted by previous errors? — Tom Storm

This happens because I am haunted by previous errors. If I had known how things would turn out, I would have chosen differently.

What would be an example of this? — Tom Storm

I was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder on the 5th of March 1998. My parents told me to ignore the psychiatrist and not take the prescribed medications. I didn't listen to my parents. I trusted my psychiatrist and took the prescribed medications. 27 years and 3 months later, I am still struggling with depression and all the side-effects of the prescribed medications. I have gone from 65 kg to 98 kg as my medication causes weight gain. My mental illness has ruined my physical health, education, career and relationships. I often wonder how my life would be if I had listened to my parents instead of my psychiatrist.

Is it things like having children, getting married, or deciding where to live? — Tom Storm

All of them and many more.

Is this one you are mulling over or a hypothetical? — Tom Storm

This is a hypothetical.

Thank you for your helpful reply. How would one assess whether to have an abortion or not? What if it is not legal where one lives? Should they go to another country where it is legal and have it there? Should they carry the foetus and give birth, then put the baby up for adoption? What is the right thing to do? How would one know?

I agree.

Thank you very much for your detailed response. I agree with you. "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick.

Scientism is the belief that science is the most authoritative or even the only valid way to gain knowledge about reality. It often involves the idea that methods of the natural sciences should be applied to all areas of inquiry, including the humanities, ethics, and religion.

There are two main types:

Epistemological scientism – the claim that science is the only reliable source of knowledge.

Methodological scientism – the view that scientific methods are superior to other methods in answering all meaningful questions.

Critics argue that scientism is self-refuting (because the belief that science is the only path to truth cannot itself be proven scientifically), and that it dismisses valuable insights from philosophy, literature, art, and spiritual or moral reflection.

If you are a free agent, please prove that you are a free agent whose choices are not determined and constrained by doing the following tasks:

1. By instantly becoming fluent at will in all the languages you have never learned.
2. By going back in time at will and preventing all suffering, injustice, and death.
3. By becoming all-knowing and all-powerful at will.
4. By beheading yourself and growing your head and brain back at will, the way planarians grow their head and brain back.
5. By making all living things forever happy.

We can have delusional beliefs, but even they are not free from the determinants: genes, environments, nutrients, and experiences. Believing that one has free will is a delusion. If I had free will, I would have already done all five tasks I assigned you.

Genes + Environments + Nutrients + Experiences → Desire (what we want to do) + Capacity (what we can do) → Behaviour (what we actually do).

I have the desire, but I don't have the capacity to do the five tasks. Both my desire and my lack of capacity are determined and constrained by my genes, environments, nutrients, and experiences.

I have the capacity to drink tea, but I don't have the desire to drink tea. So, I don't drink tea. My lack of desire to drink tea and my capacity to drink tea are both determined and constrained by my genes, environments, nutrients, and experiences. No living thing is free from determinants and constraints.

Here is a thread I recommend that you read: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/15933/what-is-real-how-do-we-know-what-is-real

I think you have this backwards, it should be “Determinants, constraints, consequences are never free from our choices.” Why? Because we are free to think otherwise. And in fact, we do. — Richard B

Our choices are not free from the determinants i.e. genes, environments, nutrients, and experiences. These variables not only determine our choices, they even constrain them. You can prove me wrong by instantly becoming fluent in a language you have never learned - it's an impossible task, or by going back in time and changing the past at will, or by becoming all-knowing and all-powerful at will. We can have delusional beliefs, but even they are not free from the determinants.

I am not seeking validation from others. I am simply curious about what others think. I don't require anyone to agree with me about anything.

If you are the only one who could do that for yourself, what does it mean to appeal to others? — Paine

We all make choices, but our choices are never free from determinants (genes, environments, nutrients, and experiences), constraints and consequences. — Truth Seeker

How would I prove myself wrong about the above statement of mine? The statement is based on a lifetime of introspection, observations, studying and research. Why would I be the only one who could prove myself wrong?

"A man can do what he wills, but not will what he wills," — Janus

I agree.

Just because one can't falsify a possibility, e.g. solipsism, it doesn't make it true.

You are right, Tom. Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts.

I will discuss Quantum Mechanics just in case you are interested.

1. Quantum Indeterminacy
What it means: Certain properties (like position, momentum, or time of decay) cannot be precisely predicted — only probabilities can be assigned.

Applies to: Fundamental particles like electrons, photons, etc.

Implication: There's no hidden variable or deterministic mechanism beneath (according to standard interpretations like Copenhagen).

2. Quantum Superposition
What it means: A particle can exist in multiple states (e.g., both spin-up and spin-down) simultaneously until it is measured.

Famous example: Schrödinger’s cat — alive and dead until observed.

3. Quantum Decoherence
What it means: Interaction with the environment (like air molecules or photons) destroys superpositions by entangling the quantum system with its surroundings.

Effect: The quantum system appears to "collapse" into a definite state without needing an observer.

Why it matters: This explains why macroscopic objects don't show superpositions — the quantum effects average out or become smeared by environmental interactions.

So What Happens at the Macroscopic Level?
Neurons, brains, cats, and humans are made up of trillions of particles.

The quantum randomness of individual particles is overwhelmed by the stability and interactions of billions of them — thanks to decoherence.

Hence, we don’t see quantum strangeness at our scale — only deterministic-like classical behavior.

Philosophical Implication:
Because of decoherence, quantum mechanics doesn't give us libertarian free will, nor does it falsify hard determinism at the level of human decisions. It just replaces classical predictability with probabilistic causality, which behaves deterministically on large scales.

Try to point to your genes and experiences. What else in the universe besides yourself are you pointing at? — NOS4A2

My sense of self is generated by my neural activities. This sense of self vanishes when I am in a dreamless sleep or in a coma or under general anaesthesia or dead.

My genes reside in my cells. They are not "me" or my sense of self.

My experiences are subjective, and only I have first-person access to them. Just as your experiences are subjective, and only you have first-person access to them.

If you are satisfied that all is determined, why ask about it?

Would it change something? — Paine

To see if others agree or disagree with me. I would be happy to be proven wrong. If anyone can prove me wrong, please do so.