Comments

  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    :up:

    Even though the Allies committed war crimes, they were morally superior to the Axis. Is that correct?RogueAI
    That question is too vague.

    Yeah, the world was better off that the Allied powers had defeated the Axis powers. No doubt the world will be better off when the US client-state of Israel destroys the Iranian client-terrorist proxies of Hamas & Hezbollah. The question is: will Israel destroy itself, or be destroyed, in the process by becoming the monsters it is fighting? Apparently, Israel has – especially, since 1967 – such that the "Greater Israel" state policy is, in practice, indistinguishable from, IMO, the US' "Manifest Destiny" and even Third Reich's "Lebensraum" ideologies.

    So, Rogue, is the concentration camp regime that's indiscriminately mass-murdering prisoners "morally superior" to the very few prisoners who had escaped only to murder the guards' & torturers' "innocent" families and friends?

    (update 5 mins after I wrote this post) To wit:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/04/us-jews-rift-gaza-israel-crisis
  • Western Civilization
    Isn’t it true you can’t have it both ways, you either have universal rights and liberal principles are a thing or they are not.schopenhauer1
    Attempts by Europeans to impose "universal rights and liberal principles" by colonizing and coopting non-Europeans for the last half-millennium was and is, in fact, trying to "have it both ways" – subverting that "universalist" end with illiberal (i.e. imperialist/hegemonic) means.

    The very idea of being self-critical of one’s OWN ideals seems a Western thing.
    In theory, maybe; but not in practice. Empires (via conquistadors, gunships, missionaries & systematic colonization), for example, are not "self-critical" emancipatory projects (pace Hegel, vide Aristotle).

    Journalist: What do you think of Western civilization?

    Mahatma Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.
    :fire:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    I'm claiming that Allied war crimes were morally equivalent to Axis war crimes insofar as they were both war crimes. Your special pleading is what's "absurd", sir. Inform yourself. :mask:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Does the committing of Allied war crimes entail a moral equivalence between the Allies and Axis?RogueAI
    Yes. What makes actions "war crimes" is that, to begin with they are not self-defensive, they are gratuitous, etc.
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Israel has a history of ethnic cleansing, apartheid and other human rights violations that skirt the lines of genocide. We see the intent put into practice on a large scale.Tzeentch
    :100:

    Did the Allies commit genocide [war crimes] against populations of Axis powers?RogueAI
    The Allies certainly committed their share of war crimes (e.g. Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki ...)
  • Antisemitism. What is the origin?
    I guess it's also lost on you that you're not making sense.
  • Antisemitism. What is the origin?
    In other words, more blaming the victim. :roll:
  • Antisemitism. What is the origin?
    And so, with respect to my previous post, what's your point about Philo Judaeus?
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    :up:

    What Coates tells us on the other hand is his personal experience, how he did feel when being in the occupied territories etc.ssu
    And the appended links to videos (which you've ignored) do not corroborate Coates' "personal experience" of "the occupied territories"? :chin:

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/850515
  • Antisemitism. What is the origin?
    IIRC, the Roman Empire, beginning(?) in the 1st century BCE and culminating in the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church and its 4th century CE canonical bible, had manufactured world-historical 'Jew-hatred'. This quintessentially European fetish comes down the millennia to us belated, hyper-Europeanized folk socio-culturally internalized as antisemitism – perhaps the most prevalent, viciously paranoiac conspiracy theory on the planet – for which Jews themselves are blamed even by so-called "philosophers" (here on display in many posts). Heil Effin' Heidegger! :shade:
  • What are you listening to right now?
    If I were to die, I'd rather people find a good finished master of my songs than a crummy old demo on a cassette. — George Harrison, 1979
    https://youtu.be/AW55J2zE3N4?si=21Us0av-Evnfqz_P (A-side single)
    Fucking rubbish. — George Harrison, 1995


    "Love Me Do" (2:23)*
    B-side single, 2023 remix
    The Beatles, 1962

    *original UK single, Ringo version
  • On the 4 Omni's and God.
    Let's suppose for a moment that God exists and is the fundamental truth of nature.Benj96
    Which "God"?

    How is "fundamental truth" distonguishable from truth itself (or not-fundamental truth)?
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    :up:

    On the post before my previous one I have linked two other posts containing three videos of other informed commentors further corroborating Ta-Nehisi Coates' observations (as well as my own throughout this long thread going back to 2021). Posting a video of three center-right / conservative Black Americans to 'counter' Mr Coates' interview, schop1, lacks substance and seems to me racially problematic. :brow:
  • Israel killing civilians in Gaza and the West Bank
    Well, you're entitled to your opinion ...
  • What Are You Watching Right Now?
    The making of the last(?) Beatles' recording...

    1Nov23

    If I were to die, I'd rather people find a good finished master of my songs than a crummy old demo on a cassette. — George Harrison, 1979 Rolling Stone Interview

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/850584

    2Nov23
  • Heading into darkness
    :smirk:
    i.e. mismanagement rationalized by misinformation ...
  • Heading into darkness
    What's the common denominator of all struggling democracies?Vera Mont
    IMHO, the common denominator is a structural lack of economic democracy (i.e. they are "democracies"-in-name-only).
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    Yes... but I guess it still leaves us with open questions about which metaphysical models we may be willing to engage with, or accept as worth our time.Tom Storm
    :up: :up:

    One must somehow choose a set of 'categorical axioms', so to speak, as non-Euclidean geometers have done in order to explore both possible and impossible versions of the world.

    So if poor old @Bob Ross had answered that there were only one cup, I'd have skewer'd him on the other horn of the dilemma, that since there was only one cup there is no difference between observed cups and cups-in-themselves.Banno
    *Boom!* :smirk:

    :up:
  • Poll: Evolution of consciousness by natural selection
    Once again, for all to see, you refuse to succinctly answer my direct questions of your "idiosyncratic" – problematic & confused – statements (re: their presuppositions and/or implications), so I'm compelled to no longer give you the benefit of the doubt that you're an intellectually honest participant on TPF and finally conclude, sir, that Socratically engaging with you is futile.
  • Heading into darkness
    "Allow" or "delay" what?

    What I meant was whether the financial elites would allow control to be handed over to benign "strong AGI".Janus
    Oh, that. I don't expect "financial elites" will "allow" it any more than junkies & drunks "allow" themselves to become addicts or chimps & tigers "allow" themselves to become well-fed captives in municipal zoos. We – cradle-to-grave dependents on 24/7 goods, services & infrastructures – already live inside the internet and there's always a mad-scramble race on to monetize 'ANI' (i.e. deep learning/neural-net systems and agents e.g. ChatGPT, OpenAI, face-recognition surveillance CCTV, Siri, etc) in any and every c/overt way possible. Mass culture has been 'amusing us to brain death' (i.e. cognitive obsolescence) for a century, which ubiquitious – no "off-switch!" – computerization has accelerated the last few decades ... and maybe the computational curve is going vertical – 'strong AGI' running the asylum – just in time to prevent us from bringing down global civilization on our own heads. Will such caretakers (zookeepers) be "benign"? I expect AGI to be no worse to us than our Haves have been to we Have-nots (or nature) for the last half-millennium.
  • Heading into darkness
    Could you rephrase what you're asking?
  • Heading into darkness
    Any more positive views of the world's future?Tim3003
    Given (3) accelerating global climate change, (2) persistent proliferation of WMDs and (1) the ascendancy of anti-democratic, reactionary populisms in high-income nations, the near-imminent prospect of 'strong AGI' (capable of automating the strategic infrastructures of global civilization in order to transform the current, unsustainable scarcity economy into a sustainable, post-scarcity circular economy) cannot be realized soon enough.
  • Poll: Evolution of consciousness by natural selection
    I take your questions seriously, and provide long detailed answers.Gnomon
    If that were so, then you would have given "detailed answers" instead of just more of your usual run-on gibberish. The fact is, Gnomon, you're intellectually allergic to direct questions put to your idiosyncratic confusions and never give "detailed answers" to them, such as
    C'mon, Gnomon, rectify this failing on your part by giving succinct, direct answers to my questions either in my previous post and/or in these old posts linked above (or show that the questions are invalid in someway/s).
  • An irony, perhaps, in the Leftist takes on Immigration and Palestine.
    ... they also hate white Europeans for wanting a more balanced approach to immigration ...flannel jesus
    Is that it? I thought we "hate" them for their nativist hatred of those "damn dirty darkies" (i.e. howling about "Eurarabia", etc).
  • What if the big bang singularity is not the "beginning" of existence?
    #2
    Consider this equation-free gloss on the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary proposal (alternative to BB cosmology) ...

    https://science.howstuffworks.com/dictionary/famous-scientists/physicists/stephen-hawking3.htm#:~:text=Hawking%20likened%20his%20no%2Dboundary,you%20reach%20the%20South%20Pole.

    In sum: modern cosmology accounts only for the development of the universe and, in its quantum gravity formulation, calls into question that it had a "beginning" (or that the BB was "the beginning of space and time"). Just as the Earth has no "edge", the universe might have had no beginning-point (i.e. "singularity") according to James Hartle, Stephen Hawking et al.
  • An irony, perhaps, in the Leftist takes on Immigration and Palestine.
    Refreshing honesty with which I can't help but agree, BC. The tragic legacy of centuries of Eurasia's "Great Game" is today's realpolitik world "governed", at best, by lifeboat ethics "regulated" by gunboat diplomacy. Climate change – ongoing legacy of Eurasian industrialization – is only accelerating these crises of economic migrations and war refugees. But how long, BC, can we national security neoliberal Haves keep out those teeming masses of global Have-nots? Apparently, without radically structural, 'progressive 'reforms' in the US, EU & the BRICS, in a couple of decades or sooner even many 'leftists' will be panicked enough to openly call for full militarization of national borders and the UNHRC be damned. :mask:

    As for the OP – As a lifelong leftist, I'm pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli; also, anti-Hamas and anti-Likud (& ethnic cleansing, land-thieving settlers).

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/847621
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    I won't ask a Kantian to get a cup out for tea. Heaven knows what might happen.Banno
    :smirk:
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    I would have thought that, where a metaphysics leads you to count two cups where there is otherwise but one, that alone would be grounds for doubt.Banno
    :up:
  • What if the big bang singularity is not the "beginning" of existence?
    #2
    Given that sound arguments cannot be raised on the following basis, does it ever make sense to 'speculatively interpret' (i.e. philosophically, or categorically, generalize from) falsified or untestable claims about the universe / nature? If so, sir, explain why you think so. Thanks.
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    See how metaphysics leads one astray?Banno
    Is it "metaphysics" or just the lazy habit of reifying abstractions?
  • Speculation: Eternalism and the Problem of Evil
    I think it clear we do not know what happens when we die. All the rest is story telling.Fooloso4
    :100:
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    A congenital problem with idealism is that, in denying that things exits outside the mind, it throws out the existence of other minds. Of course over the last few hundred years various arguments and excuses have accreted around Kant's thinking, but it seems difficult to see how we cannot be sure of the chair on which we sit, and yet we can be sure of the folk to whom we talk.Banno
    :100:
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    And those "other bodies" are just "experiences" (i.e. "representations") generated by "the I" (as per the OP), no?

    ... solipsism. Perhaps epistemic ...
    :roll:
  • Poll: Evolution of consciousness by natural selection
    I'm a Substance Monist.Gnomon
    Okay, again I ask
    ... what non-trivially distinguishes "physical events" from "metaphysical interactions"?180 Proof
    So you are a (non-Cartesian :roll:) substance dualist after all, Gnomon, as you distinguish between "act of creation" and "creation" (or "design" and "designed" ... "immaterial" and "material")
    Meta-physics is the design (form, purpose); physics is the product (shape, action). The act of creation brings an ideal design into actual existence. The design concept is the “formal” cause of the thing designed.Gnomon
    ... in effect, invoking Aristotle's (down-to-earth version of Platonic duality) 'teleological hylomorphism'. How latter-day Scholastic (i.e. :sparkle:-of-the-gaps) of you ...

    Does Immanentism allow for an eternal "Multiverse", or "Big Bounce" scenarios, [ ... ]?
    Of course. Why wouldn't it?
  • A Case for Transcendental Idealism
    Solipsism.
    — 180 Proof

    Why?
    Bob Ross
    It's the culmination of tautologous premises #1-5.