... transcendent ground does not precipitate infinite regress. — Dogbert

But, how do neurons & electrons create meaningful ideas? ... immaterial radio signals (mathematical waves ... immaterial stuff like metaphysical Minds & Cosmic signals ... the possibility that some cosmic intentional (teleological) Mind created ... all we know about the world is subjective ideas in a Mind. — Gnomon

justification for existence — Dogbert

What are male and female is science, but cultural associations with sex, aka gender, is a goldmine of philosophical discussion. — Philosophim

In modern days, "the interaction problem" is brought up as a hoax. — Metaphysician Undercover

Idealism is monistic ... — bert1

Therefore there is no reason to assume an interaction problem. — Metaphysician Undercover

... the validity of the intuition of Idealism — Pantagruel

You believe your behavior, being personal, operates freely [in] spite of deterministic events that control your life? — ucarr

I also hold that my experience of the world does not have need for most metanarratives; I am a fan of uncertainty. I am also a fan of minimalism and think that people overcook things and want certainty and dominion where knowledge is absent and where they have no expertise. — Tom Storm

By the inference of the interaction problem drawn from the intuitions of the material you mean? — Pantagruel

Since you argue for human determinism ... — ucarr

How do you explain deterministic atheism being valid whereas deterministic theism is invalid?

[T]o preclude cosmic consciousness, must embrace cosmic randomness. — ucarr

The culmination of the Cartesian ego cogito. — Pantagruel

Regarding magical_wishful_group thinking, why do you think there's a logical skein extending from you to a scale of consciousness larger than you? — ucarr

Spinoza's philosophy is both pantheistic and panpsychist ... — Gnomon

Do you deny that God consciousness is a component of human psychology? — ucarr

Do you have criteria establishing the falsifiability of ...?

If truth emerges from an identity correspondence - a=a[/u]

... theistic narratives as ... real human psychology?

The atheistic belief — Hanover

The best argument the atheist can mount against theism is claiming it’s irrational, which is true. — ucarr

Does the atheist, on principle, always shun the leap of faith?

This is the simulation of God’s uncontainable presence.

E.g., if I can only save a person from getting murdered by doing evil, then allowing the evil of that person getting murdered is morally permissible and, in this case, obligatory. — Bob Ross

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things. — Isaiah 45:7

There are varieties of moral realism which suppose that moral facts are much the same as physical facts, found lying about the place. — Banno

So perhaps my position could be described as dialogical naturalism: compassion as the empirical face of a metaphysical truth - the truth that relation precedes substance. — Truth Seeker

↪Gnomon
Thanks for the information. — Ciceronianus

In that sense, compassion isn’t an invented rule but an encountered reality - the felt structure of coexistence itself. When I harm another, I don’t merely break a social convention; I diminish the field of meaning that connects us. The “realness” of ethics lies in that experiential invariance: wherever sentient beings coexist, the possibilities of care and harm appear as objectively distinct modalities of relation. — Truth Seeker

[N]ature doesn't prescribe—it occurs. The term "Law (of Nature)" seems like a linguistic artifact. A more accurate expression would be "stable regularities of the physical world" or simply "physical invariants." — Astorre

Without compassion, the circle breaks into chaos. — Truth Seeker

So much of what we know and do is unstated and unconscious. For instance, we use language fluidly, and so clearly we all 'know' the rules of grammar, but when asked to explain them we are often at a loss. Words too: we 'know' what they mean, as we use them with ease, but we grope for definitions. The same goes for concepts, purposes, ideologies, worldviews.

And so goes the majority of our lives, acting without knowing why, doing without quite knowing what we do. This is the unexamined life. Philosophy remedies this: it can make the implicit explicit, the unconscious conscious.

As we bring the unconscious to light, more often then not, we realize that these implicit beliefs we've carried with us don't really make sense. Then we have the opportunity to replace the unconscious and irrational with the conscious and rational. This is growth, the transition to true adulthood that so many make all too late, or never at all. The conscious cultivation of a worldview which is consonant with the world, rather than an artifact of upbringing.

This is the purpose of philosophy. — hypericin

I'm not being contrarian. I'm being irritated because your OP is so vague and inconsistent and you [@Gnomon] present half-baked ideas without support and without a willingness to take responsibility for them. It's not philosophy at all, it's a book report. — T Clark

The two implementations, or messengers, deliver the same message of being; it's like a music CD [eternal, nonlocal] versus a live band [present, local]. — PoeticUniverse

[O]ntology opens the space for encounter; ethics [even more than "love" pace Iris Murdoch/Plato] keeps that space from closing into self-sufficiency [solipsism, egoism, narcissism]. — Truth Seeker

the ethical and the ontological are not two regions but two inflections of the same opening — Truth Seeker

Pantheism and panpsychism are entirely different things. — T Clark

So, are trans gender rights human rights? Some of them are. Some of them are not. — Philosophim

... a form of wishful thinking.

A "right" which isn't a legal right (i.e. enforceable and subject to protection under the law, the violation of which is compensable) is nothing more than ... — Ciceronianus

I agree that if there is something similar to pneuma it will be established [falsified] through science, not philosophy. — Ciceronianus

a Dan Brown novel — T Clark

a type of rationalization of ones own prejudices — DifferentiatingEgg

To be a lowly worm and ask a question of the divine is to understand the value and purpose of philosophy. — Philosophim

In Australian culture low status workers habitually question and sometimes harass the management and ruling classes. — Tom Storm

[Philosophy]'s about one thing, and one thing only: "Thinking in the face of the pressure not to."

The reality is that there is often immense pressure to not think about things. For many, thinking about common ideas that hold society together is dangerous. 

Never stop thinking and never stop questioning even basic assumptions and outlooks. — Philosophim