Comments

  • Superdeterminism?
    IIRC, Spinoza points out in Ethica that attributions of chance (or "free will") are a result / symptom of inadequate knowledge of causes. Classical observations are limited with respect to quantum phenomena, no? Einstein contends that QT is incomplete – Rovelli, Smolin, Bohm et al concur (though, as it turns out, so is GR). "Superdeterminism" is merely a proposed speculative fix. The jury is still out (and may never come in). Btw, Spinoza's metaphysical understanding, I think, only pertains to the non-planck scale nature – physical laws – of Newton-Einstein.

    Stephen Nadler's A Book Forged in Hell
    Excellent book on Spinoza's first (minor) masterwork. :fire:
  • Please help me here....
    I just give priority to the poetic [private] mind over the intellectual or discursive [public] mind.Janus
    Why?
  • Our Minimal Epistemic Commitment (Fixing Descartes' Cogito)
    :fire:

    It is possible that the number of minds is finite and it is possible that every mind is mortal. It is possible that every mind except one dies. Therefore it is possible that only one mind exists.Michael
    As a categorical statement, the conclusion does not follow from the antecedent hypotheticals.

    Nothing about this scenario is incoherent, therefore the solipsist’s claim that only one mind exists is coherent.
    Circular fiat. :roll:

    The coherency of the conclusion doesn’t depend on any of the premises being (or having been) true.
    Without all of the premises being true, your argument is not a sound one, sir. And, as pointed out, even (your) reliance on logic – normative rationality – presupposes selves-other-than-yourself (i.e. discursive community), which shows that your apologia, like "the solipsist's claim" itself (as well as Descartes' "Cogito"), is a performative contradiction.
  • Aristotelian logic: why do “first principles” not need to be proven?
    Logic is grammar (Witty). If you haven't already, read the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus with Aristotle's "first principles" in mind. Not an easy read but not as tedious as Kant or as abstract as Gödel.
  • Please help me here....
    I never understood duality. Sorry Heraclitus.Agent Smith
    Apparently. (He probably wouldn't accept your apology.)
  • Deep Songs
    Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day
    Fritter and waste the hours in an offhand way
    Kicking around on a piece of ground in your hometown
    Waiting for someone or something to show you the way

    Tired of lying in the sunshine, staying home to watch the rain
    You are young and life is long, and there is time to kill today
    And then one day you find ten years have got behind you
    No one told you when to run, you missed the starting gun

    And you run, and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
    Racing around to come up behind you again
    The sun is the same in a relative way but you're older
    Shorter of breath and one day closer to death

    Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find the time
    Plans that either come to naught or half a page of scribbled lines
    Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way
    The time is gone, the song is over, thought I'd something more to say

    Home, home again
    I like to be here when I can
    And when I come home cold and tired
    It's good to warm my bones beside the fire

    Far away across the field
    The tolling of the iron bell
    Calls the faithful to their knees
    To hear the softly spoken magic spells

    "Time"
    Dark Side of the Moon, 1973
    Pink Floyd
  • Antinatalism Arguments

    Heroin ... because the grass on the other side of the abyss always seems greener ...
    Choose life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose a washing machine, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose a three-piece suit on hire purchase in a range of fucking fabrics. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing gameshows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pissing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked-up brats you spawned to replace yourselves. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin? — Renton, Trainspotting
    :yawn:

    OR

    One can choose (e.g.) Epicurus & Lucretius, Montaigne & Spinoza, Zapffe & Camus, Buber & Beckett, Clément Rosset & James Baldwin, Philippa Foot & Martha Nussbaum, Albert Murray & George Steiner ... :fire:

    I tend to view death as preferable to life
    — Darkneos

    ...perhaps [because] you are doing it wrong?
    Banno
    :lol: :up:
  • Antinatalism Arguments

    If I outlive every person / activity I love, only then will I long for death. Until then, sleeping well suffices. :death: :flower:
  • TPF Quote Cabinet
    A poet looks at the world as a man looks as a woman. It's not everyday that the world arranges itself into a poem. — Wallace Stevens
  • Please help me here....
    One finger cannot point at itself.creativesoul
    :point: :up:
  • Lemonics
    I'm only surprised that there are encyclopedia entries on mnemonics but not on "lemonics".Agent Smith
    :roll:

    The practical antithesis to "memory-tricks" (enhanced functioning) is lacking memory-tricks (unenhanced functioning) and not "amnesia-tricks" (enhanced dysfunctioning).
  • Please help me here....
    If all there is, is self, then there is no other, and hence no selfBanno
    :up:
  • Please help me here....
    :smirk: :up:

    This assumes he doesn't talk to himself.Tate
    Insofar as "self" is a binary concept: if there are not any others for the solipsist, then there isn't even a/the/"him" self to talk to.
  • Aristotelian logic: why do “first principles” not need to be proven?
    :up:

    [ ... ] If they are not need to be proven... their premises are universal affirmative? (According to Aristotle's syllogisms)javi2541997
    Undecidable (à la problem of the criterion). What matters is (Peirce, Wittgenstein et al might say) "Aristotle's first principles" work ... until they don't, just like other "first principles" in domains other than logic (vide S. Haack's foundherentism as critique and alternative to foundationalism of "first principles").
  • Is the mind divisible?
    1995, University of Minnesota.
  • Is the mind divisible?
    Yeah, you don't see.
  • Al-Haqq
    Both conjectures (like Al-Haqq) are unscientific, so preference here is merely a matter of taste.
  • Is the mind divisible?
    Dumb question. :sweat:
    A mind (i.e. minding) is what a sufficiently complex brain does. That's how I know (re: cog-sci master's degree). Read D. Kahneman. Ciao. :yawn:
  • Currently Reading
    August readings:

    The Origin of Phenomena, D. B. Kelley
    Defending the Axioms: On the Philosophical Foundations of Set Theory, Penelope Maddy
    Recognition or Disagreement: A Critical Encounter on the Politics of Freedom, Equality, and Identity, A. Honneth, J. Rancière & ed. Katia Genel

    still reading:

    • Byzantine and Renaissance Philosophy, vol. 6, Peter Adamson

    re-reading:

    Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective, Karl-Otto Apel
    From the Book to the Book: An Edmond Jabès Reader, Edmond Jabès
    The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death, eds. Michael Martin & Keith Augustine
  • Is the mind divisible?
    If the mind is divisible, show me the pieces its divided into!Agent Smith
    Cognitions, subcognitions and metacognitions.
  • Al-Haqq
    ...
    Another way ... is for the universe to be a hologram in the sense that every quantum event constituting the universe also encodes the entire information set (wavefunction?) of the universe. :nerd:
    To see a World in a Grain of Sand
    And a Heaven in a Wild Flower 
    Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand 
    And Eternity in an hour
    — Auguries of Innocence (1803)
  • Lemonics
    Wouldn't it be mind-blowingly awesome if we could, contra the mainstream view, fashion lemonics, methods of forgetting (instead of remembering).Agent Smith
    Not really. Dementia and Alzheimer's are commonplace among the elderly. Also, amnesia (retrograde or anterograde) due to acute brain injury. And there are commercial, pedagogical and intellectual modes of "forgetting" (re: agnotology ... vide Herman & Chomsky, vide Adorno, vide Orwell, et al) which are features, not bugs, of corporate mass communications in – social media of – the (neo)liberal republics of e.g. East Asia, North America & Western Europe.
  • Please help me here....
    I'll go with Wittgenstein's hinges and Searle's institutional facts.Banno
    :up:
  • Antinatalism Arguments
    What should I live for or how should I live?rossii
    In the last four-plus decades, what I have learned by daily study and from lived experience is this: work everyday towards easy sleep (ergo a good death) by not doing to anyone what you find harmful to yourself. All the rest follows.

    :death: :flower:
  • Future Belief - New Age vs Atheism (wrt Psychedelics, Quantum Theory, Reality, Karma, Consciousness)
    And the sociological-pedagogical evidence for the efficacy of these "practical tools" is what exactly?

    :up: I translate "faith" as making a fetish/idol of ...
  • Please help me here....
    Thinking is essentially public.Pie
    :fire:
  • Please help me here....
    Do you reject the notion of the philosophical zombie?Michael
    Of course. Besides, even in a linguistic community of p-zombies, there are 'other mindless ones'.
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    A private language can exist; however the private linguist, him/herself, may not understand it.Agent Smith
    Like babytalk or glossolalia?
  • Please help me here....
    All discursive "disagreements", my man, presuppose shared (public) practices (language games). Refute that statement with a counter-example. :smirk:
  • Please help me here....
    Wittgenstein opined but, as per credible sources, never argued!Agent Smith
    Not true. If you read Witty yourself, Smith, you will find various kinds of inquiries & suppositions which occasionally include (reductio) arguments against commonplace nonsense like e.g. the private language argument.
  • Future Belief - New Age vs Atheism (wrt Psychedelics, Quantum Theory, Reality, Karma, Consciousness)
    I'm of the opinion that magick should be taught in public schools.Bret Bernhoft
    Why?
  • Future Belief - New Age vs Atheism (wrt Psychedelics, Quantum Theory, Reality, Karma, Consciousness)
    Nothing about the spark of life is reflected in atheism.neonspectraltoast
    How do you know there is such a "spark"?