Well, your enamoured with that picture, despite the misgivings expressed. A theory that implies a conclusion as misguided as that just quoted doesn't have much merit....apples can only exist in the mind. — RussellA
In answer to the question posed in the OP, We Are Math?, the answer is yes, we are math. — RussellA
I’ve had a dozen occupations, both professional and incidental, yet I’m still just lil’ ol’ me. — Mww
It's tricky, but cool. — frank
Your properties change, yet you remain Mww. (…) Individuals need not have an essence. — Banno
It's basically part of our definition of him. — frank
Then I have absolutely nothing by which to judge myself — Mww
It's just clear that who you are is culturally and chemically mediated. Whether you are a lawyer or a gangster, that stuff depends on your environment. Was there lead in the water you drank as a child? Did you inherit schizophrenia? Were you sexually abused? Was your father a billionaire? Did you become a heroin addict?
You'll be a very different person in each of these cases, with very different emotions and cognitive functioning. This leads us to ask what the homunculus is supposed to be. — frank
"Mww" is a rigid designator. It picks out the same individual in every possible world. It picks out Mww in those possible worlds in which Mww lost his memory. — Banno
Hence we might say "Mww lost his memory", and not resort to "There was someone who was once Mww, but they lost their memory, and so are no longer Mww". — Banno
The homunculus is what allows oneself to adapt to such a wide range of environmental factors, like what you describe. — Metaphysician Undercover
Remember that possible world semantics is about analyzing particular statements. This starts with understanding what a speaker intends. — frank
Well, that's the point of using rigid designators.It looks like you're trying to pin down "Mww" to the same meaning in every statement. — frank
Sure. This does not preclude the making of statements in which a particular memory, or a particular evolution of memory is essential to the subject of the statement. — frank
We know that a rigid designator picks out the very same individual every possible world. — Banno
It looks like you're trying to pin down "Mww" to the same meaning in every statement.
— frank
Well, that's the point of using rigid designators. — Banno
In every possible world where that individual occurs. When we say Nixon might have lost the election, the only possible worlds we're looking at are the ones in which he ran. — frank
Oh dear. — frank
You still have properties. Judge yourself as you see fit. Those properties are just not essential. — Banno
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.