Because they didn't have analytics. I am not saying people couldn't think only that certain intellectual paradigms had not been reached (such as Evidence and Reason) in any common sense we understand them today. Science is younger than the Church for instance.
Our concepts of cause and effect are modern concepts. It is foolish to assume otherwise given that even in Newtons time people thought his ability to plot out the motion of a ball to be magic. — I like sushi
No they are not. Meaning they are not simple questions they only look simple to us who know better. I imagine you might ask in the same light why would someone not clean their hands before tending to someone else's wound ... because there was no germ theory. Again, another instance of something we see as 'obvious' yet did not arise until long after the rise of the modern sciences. — I like sushi
Evidence from psychological and cognitive science studies indicates this is not true. Language, including grammar and naming is a genetically inherited human capability. — T Clark
Why would they question things they did not understand.
This is certainly a modern analytic assumption that drives at the heart of why I found the idea fascinating — I like sushi
The development of the specific term God is middle eastern/western. There is no primary concept of God (or religion) in the East. — I like sushi
You're conflating "unexplainable events" with fanciful possibilities. — Relativist
We could only possibly look for such planets within a relatively short distance from us: a sphere centered from earth out to a fraction of the volume of the Milky Way. — Relativist
Detecting life outside the galaxy seems extremely far fetched. 1% probability of intelligence developing seems grossly optimistic. On earth, only 1 out of 8.7 Million species have a human level of intelligence. — Relativist
More pertinent: I see intelligence as just one (complex) trait that life can possibly develop out of an uncountably large number of possible traits. This implies an extremely low probability. — Relativist
he different terms for saying dick in Spanish. Pick your favourite. :grin: — javi2541997
Debido a qué no se puede responder con la misma palabra, yo sigo optando por ausente, que curiosamente no aparece en el grupo de sinónimos antes expresado. :smile: — javi2541997
It's logically possible, just like it's logically possible we could work magic, or summon demons, if we just had the right incantation. There's really not much difference, when we start considering possibilities that contradict science that is as well established as relativity. — Relativist
The best guess is that conditions need to be similar to earth's: goldilocks zone orbiting a star liquid water, heavy elements in sufficient abundance.
And that's just for life. We humans are the unlikely consequence of a series of environmental/evolutionary accidents- so the probability of life with similar intelligence seems quite low. — Relativist
Even if there may be life with such intelligence, it's not inevitable that it would be inclined toward science and technology - particularly the relevant technology that would make itself known, or travel - instead of making its lives richer in other ways, or self-destructing (like we might). — Relativist
At some point someone would talk about someone with an ability to do something better than anyone else and this concept over time - tied in with storytelling - could develop either a concept of a being powerful in several areas or, with more Eastern thought, a concept of a unifying energy.
It is more or less our seeming natural propensity to imagine beyond the limits of our immediate scope and experience that I am talking about and that this is an advantageous attribute if we wish to impress others. Given that weaving a complex and compelling story in prehistory would have similar effects to evidential facts today I think there is weight to this general lien of thinking. — I like sushi
Faster than light travel and jumping through hyperspace are fantasy. — Relativist
And much SF makes the silly assumption life is ubiquitous, and that it would tend to produce beings anything like us. — Relativist
Are they overly influenced by watching science fiction? — Relativist
Anyway, thoughts and ideas on this specific idea welcome. — I like sushi
If Trump wins and inexplicably prevents on "blood bath" he promises a 100% tariff, but they would still be cheap. — Fooloso4
There are always dangers in this universe. Wandering black holes, gamma ray bursts, solar flares, and of course, a possible nearby alien civilization more powerful than oneself. — RogueAI
My posts are predicated on the aliens you were talking about earlier: aliens who can communicate by fermions and neutrinos. If you're talking about aliens who aren't technologically advanced then obviously none of what I said applies. — RogueAI
Concepts of defense and self-preservation are going to be universal. — RogueAI
We must look for other explanations for the Fermi paradox, — Linkey
And probably, imo, "they" are not even – are no longer – "species" but instead spacefaring AI probes (operationally independent of their long ago left behind biological makers).. — 180 Proof
I think any space-faring species will be somewhat curious, and any species that has climbed on top of the evolutionary ladder is going to be somewhat concerned with self-preservation, so yes, they're going to want to know that their neighbors are up to and they're going to spend a fair amount of money to find out. — RogueAI
They won't send probes to another galaxy, but they would certainly investigate nearby planets with biosignatures. — RogueAI
If they can communicate by fermion or neutrino, it would be trivial to send probes to nearby planets with biosignatures and keep an eye on them. — RogueAI
They would still know of radio and remember their own days of listening to the skies with radio telescopes. It wouldn't take much to beam powerful radio signals to all the nearby habitable planets. — RogueAI
To the point: the dead are dead, and unless you can make the dead laugh, reparations to them is nonsense-talk. — tim wood
To the living, assistance to overcome the costs of the effects of prejudice. — tim wood
If not for the generous and more than generous gifts of the universe, where do you suppose you would be? — tim wood
Yes. Or maybe we have received their signals but our systems lack the sensitivity and/or bandwidth (maybe they use neutrinos rather than EM waves) to distinguish those signals from the cosmic background noise. — 180 Proof
But we are referring to the same universe you and I exist in. That's what I meant when I said, there's not much signals except the radioactivity because the universe is made of those elements. — L'éléphant
Their method of communication might be different. And yet, radioactivity is the universal language of the entire universe. — L'éléphant
There are 118 known elements in the universe, 92 found on Earth. Apparently, if there undiscovered elements, our scientists could predict what they are. — L'éléphant
If aliens exist, they don't have much freedom as to what radioactivity they could emit -- they don't have the smorgasbord of elements to combine into their supersignal — L'éléphant
It could peek into the distant past of 13.7 B years. — L'éléphant
The general form of the remedy as it occurs to me is to provide for each individual an opportunity to recover what was taken. And again in general terms, what was taken was opportunity itself. — tim wood
I recall pictures from 1957 in Little Rock, Arkansas, of soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division of the US Army escorting nine students into their high school. — tim wood
Reparations are usually about either a fine/punishment, or an attempt to restore the victim to some status quo ante. — tim wood
I make Mancunians responsible for the tomatina party, especially Sir2u. — javi2541997
If I had to choose a fruit representing philosophy, I would go for a coconut. — javi2541997
I confess to being just an utmost humble servant of our Almighty Master, Lord of both worlds, and Creator of this universe. — Tarskian
The solution is: no civil marriage, no cohabitation, no children, and preferably no sex (both in China and) in the West. That avoids serious legal problems for both men and women. That is why this lifestyle policy is clearly in everybody's best interest. — Tarskian
Close to half of the population will live through a harrowing court case, called "divorce". It is a byproduct of civil marriage. No civil marriage means no divorce court case.
But then again, I have also pointed out that you can avoid many of these problems by moving your private life outside the West. — Tarskian
I’m not looking for advice, but simply to say that, maybe, philosophy, does not work in real situations. Or, maybe it work too well? Is philosophy the real truth-teller? — Rob J Kennedy
Plants seem to desire sunlight when they move towards it. — praxis