:ok: You stick with those MAGA-GOP talking points and I'll stick with my 22Sept24 prediction¹ that Harris-Walz will win the upcoming Roevember 5th presidential election. :victory: :party:Sorry 180 Proof. I’ll put money on it. — Mikie
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/05/harris-trump-lichtman-election-prediction.html [2]Harris will beat Trump, says election prediction legend Allan Lichtman² :victory: :cool: — 180 Proof
I (technically) have won this bet but lost the other one that Diaper Don wouldn't be the GOP nominee. The latter, however, no doubt contributed to the former. :up:Also, when you say it won’t be Joe Biden as the nominee — care to bet on that too?
— Mikie
Like taking candy from a baby. :yum: — 180 Proof
:up: :up:[Y]our arguments apply (at best) only to your concepts [ ... ] The discussion seems to be about an uncaused first cause, and that's an unbreakable oxymoron. As such you can only have it if you first grant it. But then you [@Hallucinogen] have proved exactly nothing. All this worked out millennia ago. If you're just working it out for yourself, some credit to you. But the argument has long been a dead letter. — tim wood
:Period. :100:Atheism is the rejection of theism. — DingoJones
Another trollish non sequitur ...However, if that is ↪180 Proof's definition of Deism ... — Gnomon
Speaking for myself, I respect every pro-Isreal Jew who openly, vigourously denounces and opposes the mass murdering, ethnic cleansing, apartheid policies of the US/Nato-backed Netanyahu regime.And is there a certain type of pro-Israel Jew that you do respect? — BitconnectCarlos
:clap: :sweat:[T]he plain bald fact of the matter is that if you [@Gnomon] do not know what it means, then your education is lacking. And not only just because you don't know what it means, but also because you don't seem to recognize that it's meaningful, or that you can easily look it up. It also means you're unfamiliar with books that commonly have comments in them in Latin, Greek, German and so forth. So while it does not say, "You're an idiot," you yourself have instead said, "I'm an idiot," and apparently proud to be. — tim wood
:100: :up:The only real solution here is equal rights for Palestinians, and for Israel to become a normal, modern state where multiple ethnicities can coexist. — Tzeentch
Instead of learning from his interlocuters here, who aren't exactly dumb, he [@BitconnectCarlos] chooses to drink right wing Israeli cool aid. — Benkei
So what? "Mathematical relationships" are mere abstractions (i.e. tautologies – truth, not "being") and not events, forces, facts or things.I could point out that eternal mathematical relationships (e.g., Pythagoras' theorem) don't change as everything else changes ... — Hallucinogen
Yes, rather you are a body (i.e. metacognitivrly self-aware, decaying flesh & bone; once an unviable foetus and not yet a rotting corpse) at the very least.I don't have a body. — Kurt Keefner
:clap: :fire:... 'person' is derived from 'persona' which were the masks worn by actors in Greek drama. It corresponds to 'ego', which is, we can say, the self's idea of itself, and refers to what we are consciously aware of as ourselves, who we ourselves think that we are. — Wayfarer
:100:I think "mind" is what the brain and body does ... — BC
It's both, and nothing I've writtrn here is inconsistant with that.Analytic philosophy is a toolkit and not a school of philosophy? — Leontiskos
Whatever else is meant by (ontologically) "necessary", this modality also implies unchangeable. The only way X is unchangeable in relation to every other changing Z (i.e. non-necessary Z) is that X itself is simultaneously X & not-X, or always in a state of all of its possible relations/modes; thus, self-contradictory.Also a "necessary being" is a contradiction in terms insofar as for it to be "necessary" means that "being" is unchangeable (i.e. both being and not-being simultaneously). — 180 Proof
– IFF "a necessary entity" is not itself a contradiction in terms, which it is as I've pointed out.The point is that denial of a necessary entity entails a contradiction. — Hallucinogen
DEAR GOD,
FREE PALESTINE
FREE ISRAEL
FROM THE PARTIES OF GOD. NOW!
Yes, that's entropy. :fire:Modernsociety is destroying itself. — Carlo Roosen
And a hand cannot grasp itself just like eyes cannot see themselves and a brain cannot perceive itself. Big whup. But thinking often works, that's all we need to know. "Non-thinking" – autopilot – is involuntary therefore easy, whereas thinking (i.e. learning, creating, reflecting) is voluntary and difficult. The contrast is reflectively instructive. Read Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow.Thinking cannot be understood by more thinking.
You have come to the right place, Carlo, for such delusions of grandeur to be ridiculed. :smirk:Yesterday I wrote that I not only have to build this SHAI to save the world, I also have to get philosophy back on track.
Listen to the discussion in the first youtube video I posted where Deutsch makes it clear he is a scientific realist (i.e. anti-antirealist ... anti-instrumentalist). The genesis of Hugh Everett's thesis is scientifically irrelevant and I lost interest immediately with Phillip Ball's idiotic / disingenuous first sentence "What the MWI really denies is the existence of facts at all." Again:I wonder what David Deutsche's(probably unconscious)metaphysical commitments are — Wayfarer
'bad philosophy' (anti-realism) —> bad physics —> bad philosophy (woo-woo) — 180 Proof
:sweat: Of course, ignored again by the willfully ignorant ...consider yourself ignored. — BitconnectCarlos
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-01-04/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/amid-israeli-destruction-in-gaza-a-new-crime-against-humanity-emerges-domicide/0000018c-d585-d751-ad8d-ffa5965e0000 [1]'Collective punishment' (e.g. domicide¹) and 'disproportionate retaliatory slaughter' of a several decades-long captive population for "October 7th" by (US client-state) Israel are, at least, ongoing war crimes. — 180 Proof
Oh you mean "anti-semites" like ...Anti-zionism is effectively anti-semitism. — BitconnectCarlos
https://inthesetimes.com/article/jewish-anti-zionism-israel-palestine-colonialism-annexation-apartheid :fire: :strong:(e.g.) R. Luxemburg, S. Freud, A. Einstein, E. Fromm, P. Levi, Marek Edelman, I. Asimov, H. Arendt, I.F. Stone, N. Chomsky, H. Siegman, M. Lerner, R. Falk, T. Judt et al — 180 Proof
Yeah, because the post-1967 State of Israel has not been "completely reliant" on US (& EU/Nato) military & economic funding and logistics as well as diplomatic cover (propaganda / disinformation) for a half century ... what a lying little shit you are.To oppose [COLONIZER-SETTLER-APARTHEID ETHNOSTATISM] is to oppose Jewish self-determination which, if realized, would render Jews, once again, completely reliant on foreign nations for security and strip them of their autonomy....
And once again, like Trump, your accusation is a confession, Gnomon. :eyes: :sweat:As you noted, he doesn't make rational arguments — Gnomon
Maybe in metaphyasics but not for modern fundamental physics (or mathematics re: real numbers)..A first cause is logically necessary — Philosophim
That's news to me. There are at leaat hundreds of threads wherein "fundamental reality" (i.e. ontology, metaphysics) is discussed. I even refer to the topic on my profile page. Use the site's search function to find those discussions and (maybe) contribute.People on the forum said it is not allowed to talk about fundamental reality... — Carlo Roosen